GPS/BDS卫星姿态异常对PPP相位缠绕的影响及其改正模型

范曹明; 王胜利; 欧吉坤

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20160126

测绘学报 >

2016 , Vol. 45 >Issue 10: 1165 - 1170

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20160126

大地测量学与导航

GPS/BDS卫星姿态异常对PPP相位缠绕的影响及其改正模型

范曹明 ,
王胜利 ,
欧吉坤

展开

1. 山东科技大学测绘科学与工程学院, 山东青岛 266590;
2. 山东科技大学海洋工程研究院, 山东青岛 266590;
3. 中国科学院测量与地球物理研究所大地测量与地球动力学国家重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430077;
4. 中国科学院测量与地球物理研究所, 湖北武汉 430077

范曹明(1992-),男,硕士生,研究方向为GNSS数据处理。E-mail:cmfan_1992@foxmail.com

收稿日期: 2016-03-28

修回日期: 2016-07-27

网络出版日期: 2016-11-08

基金资助

国家自然科学基金（41574015）；大地测量与地球动力学国家重点实验室开放基金（SKLGED2015-3-1-E）；中国科学院精密导航定位与定时技术重点实验室开放基金（2014PNTT06）

收起

The Impact of Yaw Attitude of Eclipsing GPS/BDS Satellites on Phase Wind-up Solutions for PPP and Its Correction Model

FAN Caoming ,
WANG Shengli ,
OU Jikun

Expand

1. College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China;
2. Institute of Ocean Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Dynamic Geodesy, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China;
4. Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China

Received date: 2016-03-28

Revised date: 2016-07-27

Online published: 2016-11-08

Supported by

The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41574015);Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth's Dynamics (No.SKLGED 2015-3-1-E);Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Precision Navigation and Timing Technology,National Time Service Center CAS(No.2014PNTT06)

Fold

摘要

在精密单点定位中，相位缠绕是一项不可忽略的误差。相位缠绕的计算严格依赖于卫星姿态的确立，不同的卫星类型产生不同的异常。本文给出了卫星在正常情况下的姿态模型和在异常情况下的姿态改正模型。使用真实数据测试以验证本文所提出模型的正确性。观察滤波收敛后出现异常情况的卫星观测值的残差，结果表明：在异常时期残差最大可能超过20 cm，然而使用本文的改正模型，残差可降低到5 cm以下。使用不同分析中心的精密轨道和钟差产品，效果存在微小差异。Ⅱ/ⅡA卫星通过地影区域的时间最长可达1 h，此期间卫星姿态完全受航向角偏差（Ⅱ/ⅡA为+0.5°）控制，出了地影区域后30 min，姿态难以模型化，因此这30 min的观测数据不建议采用。

关键词： 精密单点定位; 相位缠绕; 卫星姿态模型

本文引用格式

范曹明 , 王胜利 , 欧吉坤 . GPS/BDS卫星姿态异常对PPP相位缠绕的影响及其改正模型[J]. 测绘学报, 2016 , 45(10) : 1165 -1170 . DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20160126

Abstract

Care of the phase wind-up correction should be reasonably taken in precise point positioning. In practice, correct computation of phase wind-up relies mainly upon the information about the satellite attitude, which should be modeled differently when satellites undergo eclipsing. Different GPS satellite types would be subject to different eclipsing periods. For instance, GPS ⅡR satellites can experience noon and midnight turn maneuvers, GPS ⅡF satellites suffer from noon maneuver and shadow crossing, and GPS Ⅱ/ⅡA satellites may further experience post-shadow recovery periods when compared to ⅡF ones. As for the BDS non-GEO satellites, one should take into account the attitude control switching between the nominal and the orbit-normal mode. This paper presents a model enabling the attitude to be correctly computed for both eclipsing as well as non-eclipsing satellites. Numerical tests using real data are then performed in order to verify our model presented. As far as the filtered residuals are concerned, it is found that, their maximum residual could exceed 20 cm during the eclipsing periods. This problem is fortunately solvable when use of our model has been made, since the residuals reduce to below 5 cm. It should be noted that, our numerical results may be slightly different when we use precise satellite orbit and clock products delivered by different Analysis Centers. Furthermore, the shadow crossing period takes typically up to 1 hour for GPS Ⅱ/ⅡA satellites, during which the yaw attitude is controlled entirely by the positive yaw bias (Ⅱ/ⅡA of0.5°). The Ⅱ/ⅡA post-shadow recovery periods, covering about 30 minutes, still cannot be fully modeled; the data collected within this period should thereby be excluded.

Key words： precise point positioning; phase wind-up; satellite attitude model

参考文献

[1] LICHTEN S M, BORDER J S. Strategies for High-precision Global Positioning System Orbit Determination[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 1987, 92(B12):12751-12762.
[2] XU Guochang. GPS:Theory, Algorithms and Applications[M]. 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2007:82-85.
[3] WU J T, WU S C, HAJJ G A, et al. Effects of Antenna Orientation on GPS Carrier Phase[J]. Manuscripta Geodetica, 1993, 18(2):91-91.
[4] ZHANG Baocheng, OU Jikun, YUAN Yunbin, et al. Yaw Attitude of Eclipsing GPS Satellites and Its Impact on Solutions from Precise Point Positioning[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(32):3687-3693.
[5] KOUBA J. A Simplified Yaw-attitude Model for Eclipsing GPS Satellites[J]. GPS Solutions, 2009, 13(1):1-12.
[6] DILSSNER F, SPRINGER T, ENDERLE W. GPS ⅡF Yaw Attitude Control during Eclipse Season[C]//AGU Fall Meeting. San Francisco:American Geophysical Union, 2011:9.
[7] KOUBA J. A Note on the December 2013 Version of the Eclips.f Subroutine[EB/OL]. (2013-12-23). http://acc.igs.org/orbits/eclipsDec2013note.pdf.
[8] BAR-SEVER Y E. A New Model for GPS Yaw Attitude[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 1996, 70(11):714-723.
[9] DILSSNER F. GPS ⅡF-1 Satellite Antenna Phase Center and Attitude Modeling[J]. Inside GNSS, 2010, 5(6):59-64.
[10] GUO Jing, ZHAO Qile. Analysis of Precise Orbit Determination for BeiDou Satellites during Yaw Maneuvers[C]//China Satellite Navigation Conference 2014. Nanjing:CSNC, 2014.
[11] LOU Yidong, LIU Yang, SHI Chuang, et al. Precise Orbit Determination of BeiDou Constellation Based on BETS and MGEX Network[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4:4692.
[12] DAI Xiaolei, GE Maorong, LOU Yidong, et al. Estimating the Yaw-attitude of BDS IGSO and MEO Satellites[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2015, 89(10):1005-1018.
[13] 李敏, 施闯, 赵齐乐, 等. 多模全球导航卫星系统融合精密定轨[J]. 测绘学报, 2011, 40(S0):26-30. LI Min, SHI Chuang, ZHAO Qile, et al. Multi-GNSS Precision Orbit Determination[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2011, 40(S0):26-30.
[14] 毛悦, 宋小勇, 王维, 等. IGSO姿态控制模式切换期间定轨策略研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2014, 39(11):1352-1356. MAO Yue, SONG Xiaoyong, WANG Wei, et al. IGSO Satellite Orbit Determining Strategy Analysis with the Yaw-steering and Orbit-normal Attitude Control Mode Switching[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(11):1352-1356.
[15] WANG Wei, CHEN Gucang, GUO Shuren, et al. A study on the Beidou IGSO/MEO Satellite Orbit Determination and Prediction of the Different Yaw Control Mode[C]//Proceedings of China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2013. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2013:31-40.
[16] 李博峰, 葛海波, 沈云中. 无电离层组合、Uofc和非组合精密单点定位观测模型比较[J]. 测绘学报, 2015, 44(7):734-740. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20140161. LI Bofeng, GE Haibo, SHEN Yunzhong. Comparison of Ionosphere-free, Uofc and Uncombined PPP Observation Models[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2015, 44(7):734-740. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20140161.
[17] 张宝成. GNSS非差非组合精密单点定位的理论方法与应用研究[D]. 武汉:中国科学院测量与地球物理研究所, 2012.ZHANG Baocheng.Study on the Theoretical Methodology and Applications of Precise Point Positioning Using Un-differenced and Uncombined GNSS Data[D].Wuhan:Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences,2012.
[18] 刘冬,张清华.基于高斯过程的精密卫星钟差加密[J].测绘学报,2011,40(S):59-62. LIU Dong,ZHANG Qinghua.Densification of Precise Satellite Clock Errors Based on Gaussian Processes[J].Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica,2011,40(S):59-62.
[19] DOW J M,NEILAN R E,GENDT G.The International GPS Service:Celebrating the 10th Anniversary and Looking to the Next Decade[J].Advances in Space Research,2005,36(3):320-326.
[20] 欧吉坤.一种三步抗差方案的设计[J].测绘学报,1996,25(3):173-179. OU Jikun.Design of a New Scheme of Robust Estimation by Three Steps[J].Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica,1996,25(3):173-179.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献