大地测量学与导航

水汽层析代数重构算法

  • 何林 ,
  • 柳林涛 ,
  • 苏晓庆 ,
  • 许超钤 ,
  • 段鹏硕
展开
  • 1. 贵州电力设计研究院, 贵州 贵阳 550000;
    2. 中国科学院测量与地球物理研究所, 湖北 武汉 430077;
    3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    4. 武汉大学测绘学院, 湖北 武汉 430079
何林(1989-), 男, 硕士, 研究方向为GPS数据处理和GNSS气象学. E-mail: hunter5288@163.com

收稿日期: 2013-12-30

  修回日期: 2014-03-31

  网络出版日期: 2015-01-22

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41074050;41021003)

Algebraic Reconstruction Algorithm of Vapor Tomography

  • HE Lin ,
  • LIU Lintao ,
  • SU Xiaoqing ,
  • XU Chaoqian ,
  • DUAN Pengshuo
Expand
  • 1. Guizhou Electric Power Design Institute, Guiyang 550000, China;
    2. Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China;
    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    4. School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received date: 2013-12-30

  Revised date: 2014-03-31

  Online published: 2015-01-22

Supported by

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41074050 41021003)

摘要

讨论了代数重构算法在水汽层析应用中的各种问题,包括约束条件的构造、层析初值的选择、松弛因子的计算、终止条件的确定等,给出了计算最优松弛因子的黄金分割搜索法和确定终止条件的NCP规则,对比分析了Kaczmarz、Randkaczmarz、Symkaczmarz、SART、Landweber、Cimmino、CAV、DROP等8种常见的代数重构算法,并以香港SatRef的观测数据进行了试验.试验结果表明,以上8种代数重构技术都能够满足水汽层析的要求;迭代终止条件比松弛因子更为重要;采用文中计算最优松弛因子的黄金分割搜索法和NCP迭代终止条件,CAV算法结果最优,其次为Cimmino算法.

本文引用格式

何林 , 柳林涛 , 苏晓庆 , 许超钤 , 段鹏硕 . 水汽层析代数重构算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2015 , 44(1) : 32 -38 . DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20130308

Abstract

While applying algebraic reconstruction algorithm in vapor tomography, problems have to be solved with respect to constructing the constraint condition, selecting the initial value, calculating optimal relaxation factor and deciding the iteration termination condition. Golden section search method and NCP termination rule are given to solve the latter two problems, respectively. Eight algebraic reconstruction algorithms, including Kaczmarz, Randkaczmarz, Symkaczmarz, SART, Landweber, Cimmino, CAV and DROP algorithm, are comparatively analyzed and tested by the data from SatRef station in Hong Kong. The results show that all the eight algorithms can satisfy the requirements of vapor tomography and the iteration termination condition is more important than the relaxation condition. While the golden section method and NCP method are used, the CAV algorithm performs best, and then the Cimmino algorithm.

参考文献

[1] BEVIS M, BUSINGER S, HERRING T, et al. GPS Meteorology: Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Water Vapor Using the Global Positioning System[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1992, 97(D14): 15787-15801.
[2] DING Jincai. GPS Meteorology and Its Applications[M]. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 2009: 148-161. (丁金才. GPS气象学及其应用[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2009: 148-161.)
[3] FLORES A, RUFFINIG G, RIUS A. 4D Tropospheric Tomography Using GPS Slant Wet Delays[J]. Annales Geophysicae, 2000, 18: 223-224.
[4] YU Shengjie, LIU Lintao, LIANG Xinghui. Influence Analysis of Conditions on GPS Water Vapor Tomography[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2010, 39(5): 491-496. (于胜杰,柳林涛,梁星辉. 约束条件对GPS水汽层析解算的影响分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2010, 39(5): 491-496.)
[5] BENDER M, DICK G, GE M R, et al. Development of a GNSS Water Vapour Tomography System Using Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2011, 47(10): 1704-1720.
[6] WANG Wei, WANG Jiexian. Ground-based GPS Water Vapor Tomography Based on Algebraic Reconstruction Technique[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2011, 31(11): 3149- 3151. (王维,王解先. 基于代数重构技术的对流层水汽层析[J]. 计算机应用, 2011, 31(11): 3149-3151.)
[7] ROHM W. The Ground GNSS Tomography: Unconstrained Approach[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2013, 51(9):501-513.
[8] WEN D B, LIU S Z, TANG P Y. Tomographic Reconstruction of Ionospheric Electron Density Based on Constrained Algebraic Reconstruction Technique[J]. GPS Solution, 2012, 14(4): 375-380.
[9] TROLLER M, GEIGER A, BROCKMANN E, et al. Tomographic Determination of the Spatial Distribution of Water Vapor Using GPS Observations[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2006, 37: 2211-2217.
[10] ROHM W, BOSY J. The Verification of GNSS Tropospheric Tomography Model in a Mountainous Area[J] Advances in Space Research, 2008,47: 1721-1730.
[11] NOTARPIETRO R, CUCCA M, GABELLA M, et al. Tomographic Reconstruction of Wet and Total Refractivity Fields from GNSS Receiver Networks[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2011, 47(1): 898-912.
[12] GRADINARSKY L P, JARLEMARK P. Ground Based GPS Tomography of Water Vapor: Analysis of Simulated and Real Data[J]. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 2004, 82(18): 551-560.
[13] HIRAHARA K. Local GPS Tropospheric Tomography[J]. Earth Planets and Space, 2000, 52: 935-939.
[14] TROLLER M, GEIGER A, BROCKMANN E, et al. Tomographic Determination of the Spatial Distribution of Water Vapour Using GPS Observations[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2006, 37: 2211-2217.
[15] DENG Z, BENDER M, DICK G, et al. Retrieving Tropospheric Delays from GPS Networks Densified with Single Frequency Receivers[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2009, 36(19): 802-806.
[16] HOBIGER T, KONDO T, KOYAMA Y. Constrained Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique(C-SART): A New and Simple Algorithm Applied to Ionospheric Tomography[J]. Earth Planets Space, 2008, 60: 727-735.
[17] MING Y. Convergence Analysis of SART: Optimization and Statistics[J]. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 2013, 90(1): 30-47.
[18] HANSEN P C, SAXILD-HANSE M. AIR Tools: A MATLAB Package of Algebraic Iterative Reconstruction Methods[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2012, 236(8): 2167-2178.
[19] HANSEN P C, KILMER M E, KJELDSEN R H. Exploiting Residual Information in the Parameter Choice for Discrete Ill-posed Problems[J]. BIT Numerical Mathematics, 2006, 46: 41-59.
[20] RUST B W, O'LEARY D P. Residual Periodograms for Choosing Regularization Parameters for Ill-posed Problems[J]. Inverse Problems, 2008, 24(3): 34005-34034.
文章导航

/