大地测量学与导航

单站多参数GLONASS码频间偏差估计及其对组合精密单点定位的影响

  • 刘志强 ,
  • 王解先 ,
  • 段兵兵
展开
  • 1. 河海大学 地球科学与工程学院, 江苏 南京 210098;
    2. 同济大学 测绘与地理信息学院, 上海 200092
刘志强(1981—),男,博士生,研究方向为卫星大地测量理论及应用。E-mail:zqliuer@hotmail.com

收稿日期: 2014-01-02

  修回日期: 2014-07-01

  网络出版日期: 2015-02-14

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41174023;41174002);江苏省自然科学基金青年项目(BK20130831)

Estimation of GLONASS Code Inter-frequency Biases with Multiple Parameters Based on a Single Station and Its Impact on Combined Precise Point Positioning

  • LIU Zhiqiang ,
  • WANG Jiexian ,
  • DUAN Bingbing
Expand
  • 1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;
    2. College of Surveying and Geo-infomatics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received date: 2014-01-02

  Revised date: 2014-07-01

  Online published: 2015-02-14

Supported by

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41174023;41174002);the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20130831)

摘要

在分析传统GPS/GLONASS组合PPP数学模型中忽略GLONASS码IFB不足的基础上, 提出一种基于“多参数”的组合PPP与码IFB估计算法。将“频间偏差”与“系统时差”参数进行合并, 通过引入多个独立的“时频偏差”参数对组合PPP中的GLONASS码IFB进行函数模型补偿, 同时可实现基于单个测站观测数据的码IFB精确估计。对配备6种GNSS品牌接收机的30个IGS站实测数据进行GLONASS码IFB估计与分析。结果表明:各品牌接收机不同频率通道的GLONASS码IFB可达数米, 且表现出与频率的明显相关性, 但难以通过简单函数建模为其提供精确的先验改正值;相同品牌接收机的GLONASS码IFB整体上具有相似的特性, 而在个别测站会表现出异常特征;即使接收机类型、固件版本及天线类型完全相同的测站, GLONASS码IFB值也可能存在显著差异。新算法能实现对GLONASS码IFB的有效补偿, 明显加快组合PPP的收敛速度。虽然引入多个附加参数会导致函数模型自由度减小, 但对定位精度的影响有限, 与传统“单参数”法进行组合PPP的定位精度相当。

本文引用格式

刘志强 , 王解先 , 段兵兵 . 单站多参数GLONASS码频间偏差估计及其对组合精密单点定位的影响[J]. 测绘学报, 2015 , 44(2) : 150 -159 . DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20130800

Abstract

The disadvantages of ignoring GLONASS receiver code inter-frequency biases(IFBs) in GPS/GLONASS combined precise point positioning (PPP) are analysed in this contribution. A new algorithm of combined PPP and code IFBs estimation based on "multiple parameters" is proposed where inter-system bias parameter is merged with code IFB. Multiple independent inter-system and inter-frequency bias (ISFB) parameters are introduced to the observation equations which could compensate the GLONASS code IFBs in the function model. In the meantime, the GLONASS code IFBs can be estimated precisely based on a single station. GPS/GLONASS observation data from 30 IGS sites which involves 6 different GNSS receiver manufacturers is processed with the proposed algorithm. The results show that the GLONASS code IFBs could be several meters and a significant correlation exists between code IFB and signal frequency. It seems to be difficult to provide a priori code IFB precisely with simple function model. GLONASS code IFBs with the same receiver manufacturer mostly show similar characteristics, however, abnormal behaviors are also found in some receivers. It is worth to note that GLONASS code IFBs could be quite different with two receivers even if their receiver types, firmware versions and antenna types are all the same. The PPP results demonstrate that the new algorithm can significantly accelerate the convergence of combined PPP by compensating the GLONASS code IFBs efficiently. The combined PPP accuracy of "multiple parameters" method is comparable with that of traditional "single parameter" method and almost unaffected by freedom reduction of the function model.

参考文献

[1] ROSSBACH U. Positioning and Navigation Using Russian Satellite System GLONASS[D]. Munich: University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich, 2001.
[2] WANNINGER L, WALLSTAB-FREITAG S. Combined Processing of GPS, GLONASS, and SBAS Code Phase and Carrier Phase Measurements[C]//Proceedings of ION on GNSS 2007. Fort Worth: ION, 2007: 866-875.
[3] WANNINGER L. Carrier-phase Inter-frequency Biases of GLONASS Receivers[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2012, 86(2): 139-148.
[4] ZIONIEV A E, VEITSEL A V, DOLGIN D A. Renovated GLONASS: Improved Performances of GNSS Receivers[C]//Proceedings of ION on GNSS 2009. Savannah: ION, 2009: 3271-3277.
[5] AL-SHAERY A, ZHANG S, RIZOS, C. An Enhanced Calibration Method of GLONASS Inter-channel Bias for GNSS RTK[J]. GPS Solutions, 2013, 17(2): 165-173.
[6] YAMADA H, TAKASU T, KUBO N, et al. Evaluation and Calibration of Receiver Inter-channel Biases for RTK-GPS/GLONASS[C]//Proceedings of ION on GNSS 2010. Portland: ION, 2010: 1580-1587.
[7] CAI Changsheng. Theory and Method of Combined GPS/GLONASS Precise Point Positioning[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2008. (蔡昌盛. GPS/GLONASS组合精密单点定位理论与方法研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2008.)
[8] ZHANG Xiaohong, GUO Fei, Li Xingxing, et al. Study on Precise Point Positioning Based on Combined GPS and GLONASS[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2010, 35(1): 9-12. (张小红, 郭斐, 李星星, 等. GPS/GLONASS组合精密单点定位研究[J]. 武汉大学学报: 信息科学版, 2010, 35(1): 9-12.)
[9] MENG Xiangguang, GUO Jiming. GPS-GLONASS and Their Combined Precise Point Positioning[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2010, 35(12): 1409-1413. (孟祥广, 郭际明. GPS/GLONASS及其组合精密单点定位研究[J]. 武汉大学学报: 信息科学版, 2010, 35(12): 1409-1413.)
[10] CAI C S, GAO Y. Modeling and Assessment of Combined GPS/GLONASS Precise Point Positioning[J]. GPS Solutions, 2013, 17(2): 223-236.
[11] SHI C, YI W T, SONG W W, et al. GLONASS Pseudorange Inter-channel Biases and Their Effects on Combined GPS/GLONASS Precise Point Positioning[J]. GPS Solutions, 2013, 17(4): 439-451.
[12] GE M, GENT G, ROTHACHER M, et al. Resolution of GPS Carrier-phase Ambiguities in Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with Daily Observations[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2008, 82(7): 389-399.
[13] LAURICHESSE D, MERCIER F, BERTHIAS J P, et al. Integer Ambiguity Resolution on Undifferenced GPS Phase Measurements and Its Application to PPP and Satellite Precise Orbit Determination[J]. Navigation, 2009, 56(2): 135-149.
[14] COLLINS P, BISNATH S, LAHAYE F, et al. Undifferenced GPS Ambiguity Resolution Using the Decoupled Clock Model and Ambiguity Datum Fixing[J]. Navigation, 2010, 57(2): 123-135.
[15] ZHANG Baocheng, OU Jikun. On the Different Strategies for Integer Ambiguity Resolution in Precise Point Positioning[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2011, 40(6): 710-716. (张宝成, 欧吉坤. 论精密单点定位整周模糊度解算的不同策略[J]. 测绘学报, 2011, 40(6): 710-716.)
[16] REUSSNER N, WANNINGER L. GLONASS Inter-frequency Biases and Their Effects on RTK and PPP Carrier-phase Ambiguity Resolution[C]//Proceedings of ION on GNSS 2011. Portland: ION, 2011: 712-716.
[17] REUSSNER N, WANNINGER L. GLONASS Inter-frequency Code Biases and PPP Carrier-phase Ambiguity Resolution[C]//Proceedings of IGS Workshop 2012. Olsztyn: [s.n.], 2012.
[18] SCHAER S, GURTNER W, FELTENS J. IONEX: The Ionosphere Map Exchange Format Version 1[C]//Proceedings of the IGS AC Workshop. Darmstadt:[s.n.], 1998.
[19] GENG Changjiang, ZHANG Hongping, ZHAI Chuanrun. Real Time Estimation of DCB Using Kalman Filters[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009, 34(11): 1309-1311. (耿长江, 章红平, 翟传润. 应用Kalman 滤波实时求解硬件延迟[J]. 武汉大学学报: 信息科学版, 2009, 34(11): 1309-1311. )
[20] TEUNISSEN P J G. The GPS Phase-adjusted Pseudorange[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on High Precision Navigation. Stuttgart: Dummlers Verlag, 1991: 115-125.
[21] ZHANG Baocheng, OU Jikun, YUAN Yunbin, et al. Precise Point Positioning Algorithm Based on Original Dual-frequency GPS Code and Carrier-phase Observations and Its Application[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2010, 39(5): 478-483. (张宝成, 欧吉坤, 袁运斌, 等. 基于GPS双频原始观测值的精密单点定位算法及应用[J]. 测绘学报, 2010, 39(5): 478-483.)
文章导航

/