大地测量学与导航

Moho面扰动重力梯度信息的提取

  • 叶周润 ,
  • 柳林涛 ,
  • 梁星辉
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    2. 中国科学院测量与地球物理研究所大地测量与地球动力学国家重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430077;
    3. 地理信息工程国家重点实验室, 陕西 西安 710054
叶周润(1984—),男,博士生,研究方向为重力梯度。E-mail: yezhourun329@hotmail.com

收稿日期: 2014-01-16

  修回日期: 2015-03-15

  网络出版日期: 2015-07-28

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41304023);国家重大科学仪器设备开发专项(2011YQ120045); 地理信息工程国家重点实验室开放基金(SKLGIE2013-M-1-2); 武汉大学地球空间环境与大地测量教育部重点实验室测绘基础研究基金(13-01-02)

The Signal Extraction of Gravity Gradient Disturbance on Moho

  • YE Zhourun ,
  • LIU Lintao ,
  • LIANG Xinghui
Expand
  • 1. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth's Dynamics, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, CAS, Wuhan 430077, China;
    3. State Key Laboratory of National Geographic Information Engineering, Xi'an 710054, China

Received date: 2014-01-16

  Revised date: 2015-03-15

  Online published: 2015-07-28

Supported by

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41304023);National Special Fund Project of Major Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development(No. 2011YQ120045);Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Geographic Information and Engineering(No. SKLGIE2013-M-1-2);Basic Geodetic Research Foundation of Education Ministry's Key Laboratory on Geospace Environment and Geodesy of Wuhan University(No. 13-01-02)

摘要

在运用重力和重力梯度资料反演Moho面时,关键步骤之一即是从原始测量信号精确提取只包含该层面单一密度信息的扰动(异常)值。本文主要工作有:①为减小GEMMA Moho团队的点质量模型计算误差而采用正演精度更高的空间域Tesseroid单元体和频谱域球谐分析与综合方法,并对这两种方法进行了结果对比;②如何合理利用地壳先验模型资料。本文中最后提供了基于GOCO03S模型可以用于后续Moho面反演的重力梯度主对角线分量的全球扰动值,并对所有试验数据进行了讨论和分析。

关键词: GOCE; Moho; 重力梯度提取

本文引用格式

叶周润 , 柳林涛 , 梁星辉 . Moho面扰动重力梯度信息的提取[J]. 测绘学报, 2015 , 44(6) : 609 -615 . DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20140015

Abstract

Using gravity / gravity gradient data for Moho inversion, one of the key steps is how to extract the Moho information data precisely from raw measurements. Here we mainly discussed:①In order to eliminate the error of point mass model used by GEMMA Moho research team, we choose Tesseroid in space domain and harmonic analysis and synthesis method in frequency domain; ②The reasonable use of priori crustal model. Based on GOCO03S model, we provide the gravity gradient disturbing results of three main components which are for Moho inversion. Finally, all experiment results are discussed and analyzed in this paper.

参考文献

[1] LUO Zhicai. The Theory and Method for the Determination of Earth Gravity Field from Satellite Gravity Gradient Data[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping, 1996. (罗志才. 利用卫星重力梯度数据确定地球重力场的理论和方法[D]. 武汉: 武汉测绘科技大学, 1996.)
[2] HIRT C, KUHN M, FEATHERSTONE W E, et al. Topographic/Isostatic Evaluation of New-generation GOCE Gravity Field Models[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978-2012), 2012, 117(B5), DOI: 10.1029/2011JB008878.
[3] EBBING J, BOUMAN J, FUCHS M, et al. Sensitivity of GOCE Gravity Gradients to Crustal Thickness and Density Variations: Case Study for the Northeast Atlantic Region[M]// MARTI U. Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2014: 291-298.
[4] EVERTON P B. Ouso dos Dados da Missāo GOCE Para a Caracterizaçāo ea Investigaçāo das Implicaçoes na Estrutura de Densidade das Bacias Sedimentares do Amazonas e Solimoes, Brasil[D]. Sāo Paulo: Universidade de Sāo Paulo, 2012.
[5] ÁLVAREZ O, GIMENEZ M, BRAITENBERG C, et al. GOCE Satellite Derived Gravity and Gravity Gradient Corrected for Topographic Effect in the South Central Andes Region[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2012, 190(2): 941-959.
[6] REGUZZONI M, SAMPIETRO D. Moho Estimation Using GOCE Data: A Numerical Simulation[M]// KENYON S, PACINO M C, MARTI U. Geodesy for Planet Earth. Berlin: Springer, 2012: 205-214.
[7] YANG Ting, FU Rongshan, HUANG Jinshui. On the Inversion of Effective Elastic Thickness of the Lithosphere with Moho Relief and Topography Data[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(11): 3671-3680. (杨亭, 傅容珊, 黄金水. 利用 Moho 面起伏及地表地形数据反演岩石圈有效弹性厚度的莫霍地形导纳法 (MDDF)[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(11): 3671-3680.)
[8] KE Xiaoping, WANG Yong, XU Houze. Moho Depths Inversion of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau with Variable Density Model[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2006, 31(4): 289-292. (柯小平, 王勇, 许厚泽. 用变密度模型反演青藏高原的莫霍面深度[J]. 武汉大学学报: 信息科学版, 2006, 31(4): 289-292.)
[9] XING Lelin, SUN Wenke, LI Hui, et al. Present-day Crust Thickness Increasing Beneath the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau by Using Geodetic Data at Lhasa Station[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2011, 40(1): 41-44. (邢乐林, 孙文科, 李辉, 等. 用拉萨点大地测量资料检测青藏高原地壳的增厚[J]. 测绘学报, 2011, 40(1): 41-44.)
[10] ZHANG Chijun, REN Kang. The Undulation between Core and Mantle of Earth from Disturbing Potential[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 1994, 37(1): 115-119. (张赤军, 任康. 由扰动位确定核幔起伏[J]. 地球物理学报, 1994, 37(1): 115-119.)
[11] FANG Jian. Global Crustal and Lithospheric Thickness Inversed by Using Satellite Gravity Data[J]. Crustal Deformation and Earthquake, 1999, 19(1): 26-31. (方剑. 利用卫星重力资料反演地壳及岩石圈厚度[J]. 地壳形变与地震, 1999, 19(1): 26-31.)
[12] SHIN Y H, XU H Z, BRAITENBERG C, et al. Moho Undulations beneath Tibet from GRACE-integrated Gravity Data[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2007, 170(3): 971-985.
[13] HU Minzhang, LI Jiancheng, XING Lelin. Global Bathymetry Model Predicted from Vertical Gravity Gradient Anomalies[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2014, 43(6): 558-574. (胡敏章, 李建成, 邢乐林. 由垂直重力梯度异常反演全球海底地形模型[J]. 测绘学报, 2014, 43(6): 558-574.)
[14] LIANG Q, CHEN C, LI Y G. 3D Inversion of Gravity Data in Spherical Coordinates with Application to the GRAIL Data[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 2014, 119(6): 1359-1373.
[15] TENZER R, BAGHERBANDI M. Reformulation of the Vening Meinesz-Moritz Inverse Problem of Isostasy for Isostatic Gravity Disturbances[J]. International Journal of Geosciences, 2012, 3(5A): 918-929.
[16] WANG Hansheng, CHENXue, YANGHongzhi. An Iterative Method for Inversion of Deep Large-scale Single Density Interface by Using Gravity Anomaly Data[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 1993, 36(5): 643-650. (汪汉胜, 陈雪, 杨洪之. 深部大尺度单一密度界面重力异常迭代反演[J]. 地球物理学报, 1993, 36(5): 643-650.)
[17] SJÖBERG L E. Solving Vening Meinesz-Moritz Inverse Problem in Isostasy[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2009, 179(3): 1527-1536.
[18] SJÖBERG L E. On the Isostatic Gravity Anomaly and Disturbance and Their Applications to Vening Meinesz-Moritz Gravimetric Inverse Problem[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2013, 193(3): 1277-1282.
[19] GROMBEIN T, SEITZ K, HECK B. Untersuchungen zur Effizienten Berechnung Topographischer Effekte auf den Gradiententensor am Fallbeispiel der Satellitengradiometriemission GOCE[M]. [S.l.]: KIT Scientific Publishing, 2010.
[20] WILD F, HECK B. Topographic and Isostatic Reductions for Use in Satellite Gravity Gradiometry[C]// XU P L, LIU J N, DERMANIS A. VI Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Theoretical and Computational Geodesy. Berlin: Springer, 2008: 49-55.
[21] NOVÁK P, GRAFAREND E W. The Effect of Topographical and Atmospheric Masses on Spaceborne Gravimetric and Radiometric Data[J]. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2006, 50(4): 549-582.
[22] TENZER R, HAMAYUN K, VAJDA P. Global Maps of the CRUST 2.0 Crustal Components Stripped Gravity Disturbances[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978-2012), 2009, 114(B5), DOI: 10. 1029/2008 JB006016.
[23] TENZER R, HAMAYUN, NOVÁK P, et al. Global Crust-Mantle Density Contrast Estimated from EGM2008, DTM2008, CRUST2. 0, and ICE-5G[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2012, 169(9): 1663-1678.
[24] LASKE G, MASTERS G, MA Z T, et al. Update on CRUST1.0-A 1-degree Global Model of Earth’s Crust[C]// Proceedings of EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Vienna, Austria: [s.n.], 2013: 15-26.
[25] BAGHERBANDI M, SJBERG L E. Non-isostatic Effects on Crustal Thickness: A Study Using CRUST2.0 in Fennoscandia[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2012, 200-201(1): 37-44.
[26] REGUZZONI M, SAMPIETRO D. Moho Estimation Using GOCE Data: A Numerical Simulation[M]// KENYON S, PACINO M C, MARTI U. Geodesy for Planet Earth. Berlin: Springer, 2012: 205-214.
[27] AMANTE C, EAKINS B W. ETOPO1 1 Arc-minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis[R]. National Geophysical Data Center. Washington D C: NOAA, 2009.
[28] ZHU L Z. Gradient Modelling with Gravity and DEM[D]. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University, 2007.
[29] TSOULIS D. A Comparison between the Airy/Heiskanen and the Pratt/Hayford Isostatic Models for the Computation of Potential Harmonic Coefficients[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2001, 74(9): 637-643.
[30] MAYER-GVRR T, The GOCO Consortium: The New Combined Satellite only Model GOCO03s[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2012,87(9): 843-867.
文章导航

/