大地测量学与导航

航空矢量重力测量中光纤陀螺随机漂移误差实时补偿方法

  • 王峥 ,
  • 李建成
展开
  • 1. 武汉大学测绘学院, 湖北 武汉 430079;
    2. 武汉大学地球空间环境与大地测量教育部重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430079
王峥(1986-),女,博士生,研究方向为卫星大地测量、航空重力测量。E-mail:zhengwang@whu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2016-04-18

  修回日期: 2016-12-16

  网络出版日期: 2017-03-07

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41210006;41504016);国家973计划(2013CB733301);地球空间环境与大地测量教育部重点实验室测绘基础研究基金(14-02-01)

Research on the Real-time Compensation of the Fiber Optic Gyroscope Random Drift in Airborne Vector Gravimetry

  • WANG Zheng ,
  • LI Jiancheng
Expand
  • 1. School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, China

Received date: 2016-04-18

  Revised date: 2016-12-16

  Online published: 2017-03-07

Supported by

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41210006,41504016),The National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2013CB733301),Basic Research Foundation Program of Surveying by Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education (No. 14-02-01)

摘要

光纤陀螺随机漂移误差是影响航空矢量重力测量系统姿态解算精度的关键因素。建立模型并在输出中对其补偿是抑制该项误差的有效方法。针对传统ARMA模型只能对平稳随机漂移误差建模,且模型无法满足实时滤波需求的问题,本文引入适用于非平稳随机漂移误差的ARIMA模型,同时给出详细的建模过程,并提出采用实时平均算法消除原始采样序列中常值分量的思路,实现了随机漂移误差的实时Kalman滤波估计。基于本文所提出的模型和实时滤波算法,对光纤陀螺实测数据进行分析,结果表明处理后信号中随机漂移误差的方差减小了46.5%。Allan方差分析结果表明,滤波后角度随机游走系数和角速率随机游走系数分别降低了约50%和40%。本文的结果说明ARIMA模型能够准确描述陀螺的非平稳随机漂移误差。基于实时平均算法的Kalman滤波可实现随机漂移误差的在线估计,有望提高航空矢量重力测量系统的姿态解算精度。

本文引用格式

王峥 , 李建成 . 航空矢量重力测量中光纤陀螺随机漂移误差实时补偿方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2017 , 46(2) : 144 -150 . DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20160174

Abstract

Random drift error of fiber optic gyroscope is the crucial factor that influences the calculation accuracy of the attitude of airborne vector gravimetry. Modeling and compensating it can restrain this type of error significantly. Given the problem that traditional ARMA model can be only applied in the case of stable random drift, which cannot meet the need of real-time filtering, an ARIMA model (autoregressive integrated moving average) which is suitable for non-stable random drift is introduced along with the detailed procedure in this paper. The algorithm that can eliminate the constant component of original sampling sequence with real-time averaging method is also proposed as well as the real-time Kalman filtering estimation of the random drift. With the methods proposed above, the variance of random drift can be reduced by 46.5%. The analysis of Allan variance suggests that the coefficients of random drift for angle and angular speed have decreased about 50% and 40%, respectively. The results showed that non-stable random drift can be accurately characterized by ARIMA model and that online estimation of random drift can be realized by real-time average algorithm, indicating the potential to improve the calculation accuracy of the attitude of airborne vector gravimetry.

参考文献

[1] 蔡劭琨. 航空重力矢量及误差分离方法研究[D]. 长沙:国防科学技术大学, 2014. CAI Shaokun. The Research about Airborne Vector Gravimeter and Methods of Errors Separation[D]. Changsha:National University of Defense Technology, 2014.
[2] FORSBERG R, OLESEN A V. Airborne Gravity Field Determination[M]//XU Guochang. Sciences of Geodesy-I. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2010:83-104.
[3] LI X. Examination of Two Major Approximations Used in the Scalar Airborne Gravimetric System-A Case Study Based on the LCR System[J]. Journal of Geodetic Science, 2013, 3(1):32-39.
[4] GLEASON D M. Gravity Vector Estimation from Integrated GPS/Strapdown IMU Data[J]. Navigation, 1992, 39(2):237-253.
[5] JEKELI C. Airborne Vector Gravimetry Using Precise, Position-aided Inertial Measurement Units[J]. Bulletin Géodésique, 1994, 69(1):1-11.
[6] DEURLOO R A,MARTIN J, BASTOS M L, et al. Comparison of the Performance of Two Types of Inertial Systems for Strapdown Airborne Gravimetry[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/ION Position Location and Navigation Symposium. 2012.
[7] AYRES-SAMPAIO D, DEURLOO R, BOS M, et al. A Comparison Between Three IMUs for Strapdown Airborne Gravimetry[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2015, 36(4):571-586.
[8] 毛奔, 林玉荣. 惯性器件测试与建模[M]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学出版社, 2008. MAO Ben, LIN Yurong. Testing and Modelling of Inertial Device[M]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University Press, 2008.
[9] 严恭敏, 李四海, 秦永元. 惯性仪器测试与数据分析[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2012. YAN Gongmin, LI Sihai, QIN Yongyuan. Testing and Data Analysis of Inertial Instruments[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2012.
[10] ORAVETZ A S, SANDBERG H J. Stationary and Nonstationary Characteristics of Gyro Drift Rate[J]. AIAA Journal, 1970, 8(10):1766-1772.
[11] CHEN Xiyuan. Modeling Random Gyro Drift by Time Series Neural Networks and by Traditional Method[C]//Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Neural Networks and Signal Processing. Nanjing, China:IEEE, 2003, 1:810-813.
[12] 吴富梅, 杨元喜. 基于高阶AR模型的陀螺随机漂移模型[J]. 测绘学报, 2007, 36(4):389-394. WU Fumei, YANG Yuanxi. Gyroscope Random Drift Model Based on the Higher-order AR Model[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2007, 36(4):389-394.
[13] 白俊卿, 张科, 卫育新. 光纤陀螺随机漂移建模与分析[J]. 中国惯性技术学报, 2012, 20(5):621-624. BAI Junqing, ZHANG Ke, WEI Yuxin. Modeling and Analysis of Fiber Optic Gyroscope Random Drifts[J]. Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 2012, 20(5):621-624.
[14] 王立冬, 张春熹. 高精度光纤陀螺信号的在线建模与滤波[J]. 光电工程, 2007, 34(1):1-3, 58. WANG Lidong, ZHANG Chunxi. On-line Modeling and Filter of High-precise FOG Signal[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2007, 34(1):1-3, 58.
[15] 李家垒, 许化龙, 何婧. 光纤陀螺随机漂移的实时滤波方法研究[J]. 宇航学报, 2010, 31(12):2717-2721. LI Jialei, XU Hualong, HE Jing. Real-time Filtering Methods of Random Drift of Fiber Optic Gyroscope[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2010, 31(12):2717-2721.
[16] BOX G E P,JENKINS G M.Time Series Analysis:Forecasting and Control[M]. San Francisco:Holden-day Press, 1970.
[17] 杨叔子, 吴雅, 轩建平. 时间序列分析的工程应用[M]. 2版. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社, 2007. YANG Shuzi, WU Ya, XUAN Jianping. Time Series Analysis in Engineering Application[M]. 2nd ed. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, 2007.
[18] GOODWIN G C,PAYNE R L.Dynamic System Identification:Experiment Design and Data Analysis[M]. New York:Academic Press, 1977.
[19] AKAIKE H. Fitting Autoregressive Models for Prediction[J]. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 1969, 21(1):243-247.
[20] AKAIKE H. A Bayesian Extension of the Minimum AIC Procedure of Autoregressive Model Fitting[J]. Biometrika, 1979, 66(2):237-242.
[21] ANSLEY G F. An Algorithm for the Exact Likelihood of a Mixed Autoregressive-moving Average Process[J]. Biometrika, 1979, 66(1):59-65.
[22] KALMAN R E. A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems[J]. Journal of Basic Engineering, 1960, 82(1):35-45.
[23] TSIEN H S. Engineering Cybernetics[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1954.
[24] CANON M D, CULLUM C D JR, POLAK E. Theory of Optimal Control and Mathematical Programming[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1970.
[25] IEEE Std. 952-1997 IEEE Standard Specification Format Guide and Test Procedure for Single-axis Interferometric Fiber Optic Gyros[S].[S.l.]:IEEE, 1998.
文章导航

/