测绘学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 1165-1170.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20160126

• 大地测量学与导航 • 上一篇    下一篇

GPS/BDS卫星姿态异常对PPP相位缠绕的影响及其改正模型

范曹明1,3, 王胜利2,3, 欧吉坤3,4   

  1. 1. 山东科技大学测绘科学与工程学院, 山东 青岛 266590;
    2. 山东科技大学海洋工程研究院, 山东 青岛 266590;
    3. 中国科学院测量与地球物理研究所大地测量与地球动力学国家重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430077;
    4. 中国科学院测量与地球物理研究所, 湖北 武汉 430077
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-28 修回日期:2016-07-27 出版日期:2016-10-20 发布日期:2016-11-08
  • 通讯作者: 王胜利 E-mail:victory_wsl@126.com
  • 作者简介:范曹明(1992-),男,硕士生,研究方向为GNSS数据处理。E-mail:cmfan_1992@foxmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(41574015);大地测量与地球动力学国家重点实验室开放基金(SKLGED2015-3-1-E);中国科学院精密导航定位与定时技术重点实验室开放基金(2014PNTT06)

The Impact of Yaw Attitude of Eclipsing GPS/BDS Satellites on Phase Wind-up Solutions for PPP and Its Correction Model

FAN Caoming1,3, WANG Shengli2,3, OU Jikun3,4   

  1. 1. College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China;
    2. Institute of Ocean Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Dynamic Geodesy, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China;
    4. Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China
  • Received:2016-03-28 Revised:2016-07-27 Online:2016-10-20 Published:2016-11-08
  • Supported by:

    The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41574015);Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth's Dynamics (No.SKLGED 2015-3-1-E);Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Precision Navigation and Timing Technology,National Time Service Center CAS(No.2014PNTT06)

摘要:

在精密单点定位中,相位缠绕是一项不可忽略的误差。相位缠绕的计算严格依赖于卫星姿态的确立,不同的卫星类型产生不同的异常。本文给出了卫星在正常情况下的姿态模型和在异常情况下的姿态改正模型。使用真实数据测试以验证本文所提出模型的正确性。观察滤波收敛后出现异常情况的卫星观测值的残差,结果表明:在异常时期残差最大可能超过20 cm,然而使用本文的改正模型,残差可降低到5 cm以下。使用不同分析中心的精密轨道和钟差产品,效果存在微小差异。Ⅱ/ⅡA卫星通过地影区域的时间最长可达1 h,此期间卫星姿态完全受航向角偏差(Ⅱ/ⅡA为+0.5°)控制,出了地影区域后30 min,姿态难以模型化,因此这30 min的观测数据不建议采用。

关键词: 精密单点定位, 相位缠绕, 卫星姿态模型

Abstract:

Care of the phase wind-up correction should be reasonably taken in precise point positioning. In practice, correct computation of phase wind-up relies mainly upon the information about the satellite attitude, which should be modeled differently when satellites undergo eclipsing. Different GPS satellite types would be subject to different eclipsing periods. For instance, GPS ⅡR satellites can experience noon and midnight turn maneuvers, GPS ⅡF satellites suffer from noon maneuver and shadow crossing, and GPS Ⅱ/ⅡA satellites may further experience post-shadow recovery periods when compared to ⅡF ones. As for the BDS non-GEO satellites, one should take into account the attitude control switching between the nominal and the orbit-normal mode. This paper presents a model enabling the attitude to be correctly computed for both eclipsing as well as non-eclipsing satellites. Numerical tests using real data are then performed in order to verify our model presented. As far as the filtered residuals are concerned, it is found that, their maximum residual could exceed 20 cm during the eclipsing periods. This problem is fortunately solvable when use of our model has been made, since the residuals reduce to below 5 cm. It should be noted that, our numerical results may be slightly different when we use precise satellite orbit and clock products delivered by different Analysis Centers. Furthermore, the shadow crossing period takes typically up to 1 hour for GPS Ⅱ/ⅡA satellites, during which the yaw attitude is controlled entirely by the positive yaw bias (Ⅱ/ⅡA of0.5°). The Ⅱ/ⅡA post-shadow recovery periods, covering about 30 minutes, still cannot be fully modeled; the data collected within this period should thereby be excluded.

Key words: precise point positioning, phase wind-up, satellite attitude model

中图分类号: