利用ESAR极化数据的复杂地形区森林地上生物量估算

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20170120

测绘学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 1353-1362.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20170120

利用ESAR极化数据的复杂地形区森林地上生物量估算

张海波¹, 汪长城^1,2, 朱建军¹, 付海强¹

1. 中南大学地球科学与信息物理学院, 湖南长沙 410083;
2. 中南大学有色金属成矿预测教育部重点实验室, 湖南长沙 410083

收稿日期:2017-03-14 修回日期:2017-10-19 出版日期:2018-10-20 发布日期:2018-10-24
通讯作者: 汪长城 E-mail:wangchangcheng@csu.edu.cn
作者简介:张海波(1985-),男,博士生,研究方向为极化SAR生物量反演。E-mail:haibo_csu@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41531068；41371335；41671356）；湖南省自然科学基金（2016JJ2141）；欧空局数据合作计划（14655）；中南大学研究生自主探索创新项目（2017zzts179）第10期张海波，等：利用ESAR极化数据的复杂地形区森林地上生物量估算

Forest Above-ground Biomass Estimation for Rugged Terrain by Using ESAR Polarization Data

ZHANG Haibo¹, WANG Changcheng^1,2, ZHU Jianjun¹, FU Haiqiang¹

1. School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring(Central South University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410083, China

Received:2017-03-14 Revised:2017-10-19 Online:2018-10-20 Published:2018-10-24
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41531068;41371335;41671356);The National Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China (No. 2016JJ2141);PA-SB ESA EO Project Campaign(No. 14655);Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate of Central South University (No. 2017zzts179)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用机载E-SAR传感器获取的P-波段全极化SAR数据与实测林分样地数据，分析不同极化方式后向散射系数在地形起伏区与森林地上生物量（AGB）的响应关系，以改进的水云模型为基础，建立了融入地形因子的分析性模型。采用遗传算法确定模型的最优参数，并对模型在不同坡度情况下的可靠性、稳定性进行分析，同时通过与常用模型相对比，确定水云分析模型在复杂地形区估算AGB的优势。结果表明：在森林AGB处于较低值的情况下，后向散射系数（HH、HV、VV）变化趋势与AGB变化趋势保持一致，但随着AGB值的增大，这种一致性仅在HV极化方式下继续保持，因此相比之下，HV极化方式更适用于复杂地形区生物量的估算。地形对森林AGB的估算具有极大的影响，后向散射系数与AGB的相关性随着地形坡度的增加而减小。5种模型估算森林AGB的能力大小排序为：水云分析模型 > 二次模型 > 对数模型 > 指数模型 > 线性模型。地形起伏较小的地区估算稳定性排序为：水云分析模型 > 二次模型 > 对数模型 > 指数模型>线性模型。地形起伏较大的地区估算稳定性排序为。水云分析模型 > 二次模型 > 线性模型 > 指数模型 > 对数模型。利用水云分析模型对研究区AGB估算，其实测AGB与模型估算的生物量值决定系数为0.597，RMSE为30.876 t/hm²，拟合精度为77.40%。

关键词: 极化SAR, 森林地上生物量, 地形, 局部入射角, 遗传算法

Abstract: The influence of the ground slope on radar backscatter has been proven to be greater for lower radar frequencies due to deeper canopy penetration. In order to solve this problem and obtain accurate estimation of forest above-ground biomass (AGB) in the region of rugged terrain, the analytic model integrating the topographic factors was presented based on the modified water-cloud model (WCM) and the relationship between different backscattering coefficients and the forest AGB using the airborne P-band full polarimetric SAR (PolSAR) data acquired by E-SAR. In this study, genetic algorithm (GA) was used to determine the optimal parameter values for the model, the terrain slope was divided into three grades (0~5°、5°~10°、≥ 10°). Then we analyzed the reliability and stability of the model under the condition of different slope. Meanwhile, in order to determine advantage of the water-cloud analysis model in evaluating AGB, we used common models include linear model、logarithm model、exponential model、quadratic model to comparison and analysis. Through the comparative analysis, we found that when the forest AGB at lower level, the variational trend of backscatter coefficients (HH、HV、VV) kept the same with the vatiational trend of AGB. With the increase of AGB values, this consistency in HV backscatter coefficient values to keep alone, therefore, HV polarization was the best to estimate biomass in the complex terrain region. The terrain has a great impact on estimating forest AGB, a phenomenon was that the correlation of backscatter coefficients and forest AGB decreased with the increase of ground slope. The capabilities of estimate biomass in the five models were different, from strong to weak was that water-cloud analysis model > quadratic model > logarithm model > exponential model > linear model. Meanwhile, through comparing the change of the determination coefficients (R²), these models were found that have different stabilities to estimate forest AGB in different slope levels. When the slope changed from 0~5° to 5°~10°, the stability from strong to weak was water-cloud analysis model > quadratic model > logarithm model > exponential model > linear model. With the slope from 5°~10° to ≥ 10°, this sequence became that water-cloud analysis model > exponential model > linear model > quadratic model > logarithm model. In addition, between 0~5° to ≥ 10°, this sequence was water-cloud analysis model > quadratic model > linear model > exponential model > logarithm model respectively. Although, there was different sequence in five models, the stability of the water-cloud analysis model was higher than other models. So, we tried to use water-cloud analysis model to estimate forest AGB for the study area. The result showed that the R² between the field AGB and estimated AGB was 0.597, the root mean squared error (RMSE) was 30.876 t/hm², the overall accuracy was 77.40%.

Key words: PolSAR, above-ground biomass(AGB), terrain, local incidence angle, genetic algorithm

中图分类号:

P237

张海波, 汪长城, 朱建军, 付海强. 利用ESAR极化数据的复杂地形区森林地上生物量估算[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(10): 1353-1362.

ZHANG Haibo, WANG Changcheng, ZHU Jianjun, FU Haiqiang. Forest Above-ground Biomass Estimation for Rugged Terrain by Using ESAR Polarization Data[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2018, 47(10): 1353-1362.

参考文献

[1] HOUGHTON R A. Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance[J]. Global Change Biology, 2005, 11(6):945-958.
[2] 解清华, 汪长城, 朱建军, 等. 顾及地形因素的S-RVOG模型和PD相干最优算法联合反演植被高度[J]. 测绘学报, 2015, 44(6):686-693, 701. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20130731. XIE Qinghua, WANG Changcheng, ZHU Jianjun, et al. Forest Height Inversion by Combining S-RVOG Model with Terrain Factor and PD Coherence Optimization[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2015, 44(6):686-693, 701. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20130731.
[3] 刘茜, 杨乐, 柳钦火, 等. 森林地上生物量遥感反演方法综述[J]. 遥感学报, 2015, 19(1):62-74. LIU Qian, YANG Le, LIU Qinhuo, et al. Review of Forest Above Ground Biomass Inversion Methods Based on Remote Sensing Technology[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2015, 19(1):62-74.
[4] 黄克标, 庞勇, 舒清态, 等. 基于ICESat GLAS的云南省森林地上生物量反演[J]. 遥感学报, 2013, 17(1):165-179. HUANG Kebiao, PANG Yong, SHU Qingtai, et al. Above Ground Forest Biomass Estimation Using ICESat GLAS in Yunnan, China[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2013, 17(1):165-179.
[5] GHASEMI N, SAHEBI M, MOHAMMADZADEH A. A Review on Biomass Estimation Methods Using Synthetic Aperture Radar Data[J]. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2011, 4(1):776-788.
[6] 冯宗炜, 陈楚莹, 张家武, 等. 湖南会同地区马尾松林生物量的测定[J]. 林业科学, 1982, 18(2):127-134. FENG Zongwei, CHEN Chuying, ZHANG Jiawu, et al. Determination of Biomass of Pinus Massoniana Stand in Huitong County, Hunan Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1982, 18(2):127-134.
[7] BACCINI A, GOETZ S J, WALKER W S, et al. Estimated Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Tropical Deforestation Improved by Carbon-density Maps[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2012, 2(3):182-185.
[8] BOUDREAU J, NELSON R F, MARGOLIS H A, et al. Regional Aboveground Forest Biomass Using Airborne and Spaceborne LiDAR in Québec[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112(10):3876-3890.
[9] KINDERMANN G E, MCCALLUM I, FRITZ S, et al. A Global Forest Growing Stock, Biomass and Carbon Map Based on FAO Statistics[J]. Silva Fennica, 2008, 42(3):387-396.
[10] 王新云, 郭艺歌, 何杰. 基于多源遥感数据的草地生物量估算方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(11):159-166. WANG Xingyun, GUO Yige, HE Jie. Estimation of Above-ground Biomass of Grassland Based on Multi-source Remote Sensing Data[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(11):159-166.
[11] SINHA S, JEGANATHAN C, SHARMA L K, et al. A Review of Radar Remote Sensing for Biomass Estimation[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2015, 12(5):1779-1792.
[12] ALAPPAT V O, JOSHI A K, KRISHNAMURTHY Y V N. Tropical Dry Deciduous Forest Stand Variable Estimation Using SAR Data[J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2011, 39(4):583-589.
[13] HAMDAN O, AZIZ H K, RAHMAN K A. Remotely Sensed L-band SAR Data for Tropical Forest Biomass Estimation[J]. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2011, 23(3):318-327.
[14] MINH D H T, TOAN T L, TEBALDINI S, et al. Assessment of the P-and L-band SAR Tomography for the Characterization of Tropical Forests[C]//Proceedings of 2015 IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Milan, Italy:IEEE, 2015, 15(2):2931-2934.
[15] SOJA M J, SANDBERG G, ULANDER L M H. Topographic Correction for Biomass Retrieval from P-band SAR Data in Boreal Forests[C]//Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Honolulu:IEEE, 2010, 15(5):4776-4779.
[16] SMALL D. Flattening Gamma:Radiometric Terrain Correction for SAR Imagery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(8):3081-3093.
[17] WEGMULLER U. Automated Terrain Corrected SAR Geocoding[C]//Proceedings of 1999 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Hamburg:IEEE, 1999(3):1712-1714.
[18] LOEW A, MAUSER W. Generation of Geometrically and Radiometrically Terrain Corrected SAR Image Products[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 106(3):337-349.
[19] FREY O, SANTORO M, WERNER C L, et al. DEM-based SAR Pixel-area Estimation for Enhanced Geocoding Refinement and Radiometric Normalization[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2013, 10(1):48-52.
[20] 冯琦, 陈尔学, 李增元, 等. 基于机载P-波段全极化SAR数据的复杂地形森林地上生物量估测方法[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(3):10-22. FENG Qi, CHEN Erxue, LI Zengyuan, et al. Forest Above-ground Biomass Estimation Method for Rugged Terrain Based on Airborne P-band PolSAR Data[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(3):10-22.
[21] KUGLER F, LEE S K, HAJNSEK I, et al. Forest Height Estimation by Means of Pol-InSAR Data Inversion:The Role of the Vertical Wave Number[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(10):5294-5311.
[22] SANDBERG G, ULANDER L M H, FRANSSON J E S, et al. L-band and P-band Backscatter Intensity for Biomass Retrieval in Hemiboreal Forest[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115(11):2874-2886.
[23] 黎夏, 叶嘉安, 王树功, 等. 红树林湿地植被生物量的雷达遥感估算[J]. 遥感学报, 2006, 10(3):388-396. LI Xia, YE Jiaan, WANG Shugong, et al. Estimating Mangrove Wetland Biomass Using Radar Remote Sensing[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006, 10(3):388-396.
[24] ASKNE J, DAMMERT P B G, ULANDER L M H, et al. C-band Repeat-pass Interferometric SAR Observations of the Forest[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997, 35(1):25-35.
[25] SANTORO M, ASKNE J, SMITH G, et al. Stem Volume Retrieval in Boreal Forests from ERS-1/2 Interferometry[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81(1):19-35.
[26] ASKNE J, SANTORO M. Multitemporal Repeat Pass SAR Interferometry of Boreal Forests[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005, 43(6):1219-1228.
[27] 张风雷. 遗传算法与最小二乘法在实验数据处理中的对比研究[J]. 大学物理, 2007, 26(6):32-34. ZHANG Fenglei. The Comparative Analysis Between the GA and the Method of Least Squares in Data Processing[J]. College Physics, 2007, 26(6):32-34.

利用ESAR极化数据的复杂地形区森林地上生物量估算

Forest Above-ground Biomass Estimation for Rugged Terrain by Using ESAR Polarization Data

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	彭认灿, 董箭, 贾帅东, 唐露露, 王芳. 数字水深模型建模技术研究进展与展望[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1575-1587.
[2]	孙中苗, 管斌, 翟振和, 欧阳明达. 海洋卫星测高及其反演全球海洋重力场和海底地形模型研究进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(6): 923-934.
[3]	单杰, 田祥希, 李爽, 李韧菲. 星载激光测高技术进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(6): 964-982.
[4]	李国元, 唐新明, 周晓青, 卢刚, 陈继溢, 黄庚华, 高小明, 刘诏, 欧阳斯达. 高分七号卫星激光测高仪无场几何定标法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(3): 401-412.
[5]	徐焕, 于锦海, 安邦, 万晓云. 利用垂直重力梯度异常反演海底地形的解析方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(1): 53-62.
[6]	范雕, 李姗姗, 欧阳永忠, 孟书宇, 陈成, 邢志斌, 张驰. 顾及海底地形非线性项的最小二乘配置反演方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(7): 953-971.
[7]	纪雪, 唐秋华, 陈义兰, 李杰, 丁德秋. 联合支持向量机和增强学习算法的多波束声学底质分类[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(7): 972-981.
[8]	刘远刚, 李少华, 蔡永香, 何贞铭, 马潇雅, 李鹏程, 郭庆胜, 何宗宜. 移位安全区约束下的建筑物群移位免疫遗传算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(6): 812-822.
[9]	胡敏章, 张胜军, 金涛勇, 文汉江, 褚永海, 姜卫平, 李建成. 新一代全球海底地形模型BAT_WHU2020[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(8): 939-954.
[10]	张志衡, 董箭, 彭认灿, 陆毅, 陈秋, 朱强. 基于滚动球变换的TIN_DDM地形形态划分及连续尺度表达[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(5): 644-655.
[11]	刘志豪, 赵荻能, 吴自银, 阳凡林, 王明伟, 周洁琼. 联合不确定度的多期水深剖面分析方法及应用[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(3): 386-395.
[12]	范雕, 李姗姗, 杨军军, 孟书宇, 邢志斌, 张驰, 冯进凯. 利用多元回归分析反演西南印度洋区域海底地形[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(2): 147-161.
[13]	黄炎, 王庆宾, 冯进凯, 邢志斌, 范雕, 谭勖立, 吕明昊. 局部地形改正快速计算的GPU并行的棱柱法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(11): 1430-1437.
[14]	解清华, 朱建军, 汪长城, 付海强, 张兵. 基于S-RVoG模型的PolInSAR森林高度非线性复数最小二乘反演算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(10): 1303-1310.
[15]	郭锴, 刘焱雄, 徐文学, 何秀凤, 张子引, 刘海涛. 机载激光测深波形分解中LM与EM参数优化方法比较[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(1): 117-131.