Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica >

2015 , Vol. 44 >Issue 2: 142 - 149

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20130412

Analysis of Various Approaches for Gravity Field Recovery by Using the GOCE Satellite Orbits

  • SU Yong ,
  • FAN Dongming ,
  • YOU Wei
Expand
  • Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031 China

Received date: 2013-12-03

  Revised date: 2014-09-17

  Online published: 2015-02-14

Supported by

The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(Nos.SWJTU10ZT02;SWJTU12B12012);The Doctoral Innovation Funds of Southwest Jiaotong University;The Research Funds for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China(No.2012018412006)

Fold

Abstract

The energy conservation approach has been adopted to exploit GOCE orbit information in earlier GOCE time-wise and space-wise gravity field models which are two kinds of official ESA products, but the accuracy of long-wavelength gravity signal is low. Gravity field recovery with GOCE satellite data is an ill-posed problem and the precision of zonal coefficients is low due to the polar gaps, which needs be processed by regularization technique. This paper analyzes the accuracy of existing approaches for gravity field recovery in processing GOCE data and the selection of optimal regularization techniques and parameters. Several gravity field models were recovered based on GOCE precise orbits of 92-days from 2009-11-01 to 2010-01-31 with the energy conservation approach, short-arc integral approach and average acceleration approach. These approaches do not require any initial values of unknown parameters and reference gravity models. Besides, the Tikhonov regularization technique was applied to tackle the ill-posed problem. The results show that the highest accuracy of the model is recovered by the average acceleration approach, the lowest accuracy is the energy conservation approach, and the accuracy of short-arc integral approach is slightly worse than average acceleration approach. Therefore, such methods as the average acceleration approach or short-arc integral approach should be recommended to be applied when processing the GOCE orbit data. Gravity field models can effectively recovered by GOCE orbit data with the order and degree 120 when orbit and gradiometer data are combined to processes in the future. Kaula regularization and second-order Tikhonov (SOT) are superior to other regularization techniques in dealing with ill-posed problem of GOCE, and the corresponding optimal regularization parameters of both techniques are consistent. However, the effects of polar gaps could not be completely inhibited by regularization technique; it should be combined with other data, such as GRACE satellite data, to get the desired results.

Key words： GOCE satellite; gravity field model; energy conservation approach; short-arc integral approach; average acceleration approach; regularization technique

Cite this article

SU Yong , FAN Dongming , YOU Wei . Analysis of Various Approaches for Gravity Field Recovery by Using the GOCE Satellite Orbits[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2015 , 44(2) : 142 -149 . DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20130412

References

[1] European Space Age. GOCE Mission Requirements Document[EB/OL].[2013-05-17].http://earth.esa.int/web/guest/documeut-library.
[2] HWANG C. Gravity Recovery Using COSMIC GPS Data: Application of Orbital Perturbation Theory [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2001, 75(3): 117-136.
[3] ZHU S, REIGBER C, KÖNIG R. Integrated Adjustment of CHAMP, GRACE, and GPS Data [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2004, 78(2): 103-108.
[4] MAYER-GÜRR T, ILK K H, EICKER A, et al. ITG-CHAMP01: A CHAMP Gravity Field Model from Short Kinematic Arcs over a One-year Observation Period [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2005, 78(8): 462-480.
[5] YI W Y. The Earth's Gravity Field from GOCE [D]. München: Technische Universitt München, 2011.
[6] YOU W, FAN D M, HUANG Q, Analysis of Short-arc Integral Approach to Recover the Earth's Gravitational Field [J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(11): 2745-2752.(游为, 范东明, 黄强. 卫星重力反演的短弧长积分法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(11): 2745-2752.)
[7] REUBELT T, AUSTEN G, GRAFAREND E W. Space Gravity Spectroscopy-determination of the Earth' s Gravitational Field by Means of Newton Interpolated LEO Ephemeris Case Studies on Dynamic (CHAMP Rapid Science Orbit) and Kinematic Orbits[J]. Advances in Geosciences, 2003, 1: 127-135.
[8] SHEN Y Z. Study of Recovering Gravitational Potential Model from the Ephemerides of CHAMP [D]. Wuhan: Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2000.(沈云中. 应用CHAMP卫星星历精化地球重力场模型的研究[D]. 武汉: 中国科学院测量与地球物理研究所, 2000.)
[9] DITMAR P, VAN DER SLUIJS A A E. A Technique for Modeling the Earth's Gravity Field on the Basis of Satellite Accelerations [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2004, 78(2): 12-33.
[10] DITMAR P, LIU X. Dependence of the Earth's Gravity Model Derived from Satellite Accelerations on a Priori Information [J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 2007, 43(2): 189-199.
[11] HAN S C, JEKELI C, SHUM C K. Efficient Gravity Field Recovery Using in Situ Disturbing Potential Observables from CHAMP [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2002, 29(16): 1789-1793.
[12] VISSER P, SNEEUW N, GERLACH C. Energy Integral Method for Gravity Field Determination from Satellite Orbit Coordinates [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2003, 77(3): 207-216.
[13] BEUTLER G, JÄGGI A, MERVART L, et al. The Celestial Mechanics Approach: Theoretical Foundations [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2010, 84(10): 605-624.
[14] BEULTER G, JÄGGI A, MERVART L, et al. The Celestial Mechanics Approach: Application to Data of the GRACE Mission [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2010, 84(11): 661-681.
[15] ILK K H, LÖCHER A, MAYER-GÜRR T. Do We Need New Gravity Field Recovery Techniques for the New Gravity Field Satellites? [C]//VI Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Theoretical and Computational Geodesy. Berlin: Springer, 2008: 3-9.
[16] MAYER-GüRR T, FEUCHTINGER M, KUSCHE J. A Comparison of Various Procedures for Global Gravity Field Recovery from CHAMP Orbits [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2005: 151-156.
[17] REUBELT T, SNEEUW N, GRAFAREND E W. Comparison of Kinematic Orbit Analysis Methods for Gravity Field Recovery [C]//VII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. Berlin: Springer, 2012: 259-265.
[18] MIGLIACCIO F, REGUZZONI M, SANSO F, et al. GOCE Data Analysis: The Space-wise Approach and the First Space-wise Gravity Field Model[C]//Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium.Copenhagen:[s.n.], 2010.
[19] PAIL R, BRUINSMA S, MIGLIACCIO F, et al. First GOCE Gravity Field Models Derived by Three Different Approaches [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2011, 85(11): 819-843.
[20] YI W Y. An Alternative Computation of a Gravity Field Model from GOCE [J]. Advances in space research, 2012, 50(3): 371-384.
[21] ZHONG Bo, LUO Zhicai, LI Jiancheng, et al. Spectral Combination Method for Recovering the Earth's Gravity Field from High-low SST and SGG Data[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2012, 41(5): 735-742.(钟波, 罗志才, 李建成, 等. 联合高低卫-卫跟踪和卫星重力梯度数据恢复地球重力场的谱组合法[J]. 测绘学报, 2012, 41(5): 735-742. )
[22] BAUR O, REUBELT T, WEIGELT M, et al. GOCE Orbit Analysis: Long-wavelength Gravity Field Determination Using the Acceleration Approach [J]. Advances in Space Research, 2012, 50(3): 385-396.
[23] EGG-C. GOCE High Level Processing Facility:GOCE Level 2 Product Data Hand-book[EB/OL].[2012-12-25].www.iapg.bgutum.de/Projects/GOCE_HPF.
[24] KUSCHE J, KLEES R. Regularization of Gravity Field Estimation from Satellite Gravity Gradients [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2002, 76(6): 359-368.
[25] DITMAR P, KUSCHE J, KLEES R. Computation of Spherical Harmonic Coefficients from Gravity Gradiometry Data to be Acquired by the GOCE Satellite: Regularization Issues [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2003, 77(7): 465-477.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉