Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica >

2016 , Vol. 45 >Issue 11: 1308 - 1317

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20160372

Filtering of Point Clouds Using Fusion of Three Types of Primitives Including Points, Objects and Key Points

  • LIN Xiangguo ,
  • ZHANG Jixian ,
  • NING Xiaogang ,
  • DUAN Minyan ,
  • ZANG Yi
Expand
  • Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100830, China

Received date: 2016-07-29

  Revised date: 2016-10-01

  Online published: 2016-12-03

Supported by

The National Natural Science Foundations of China (No.41371405); The Foundation for Remote Sensing Young Talents by the National Remote Sensing Center of China; The Basic Research Fund of the Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping(No.777161103)

Fold

Abstract

Primitive, being the basic processing unit, is one of the key factors to determine the accuracy and efficiency of point cloud filtering. Triangular irregular network (TIN) progressive densification (TPD) and object-based TIN progressive densification (OTPD) are two existing filtering methods, but single primitive is employed by them. A multiple-primitives-based TIN progressive densification (MPTPD) filtering method is proposed. It is composed of three key stages, including point cloud segmentation, extraction of key points of objects, the key-points-based judging of the objects. Specifically, point, object and the key points are the primitive of the above three stages respectively. Four testing datasets, including two airborne LiDAR and two photogrammetric point clouds, are used to verify the overall performances of the above three filtering methods. Experimental results suggest that the proposed MPTPD has the best overall performance. In the viewpoint of accuracy, MPTPD and OTPD have the similar accuracy. Moreover, compared with the TPD, MPTPD is able to reduce omission errors and total errors by 22.07% and 8.44% respectively. In the viewpoint of efficiency, under most of the cases, TPD is the highest, MPTPD is the second, and OTPD is the slowest. Moreover, the total time cost of MPTPD is only 57.93% of the one of OTPD.

Key words： filtering; LiDAR point cloud; photogrammetric point cloud; objects; triangular irregular network

Cite this article

LIN Xiangguo , ZHANG Jixian , NING Xiaogang , DUAN Minyan , ZANG Yi . Filtering of Point Clouds Using Fusion of Three Types of Primitives Including Points, Objects and Key Points[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2016 , 45(11) : 1308 -1317 . DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20160372

References

[1] 黄先锋, 李卉, 王潇, 等. 机载LiDAR数据滤波方法评述[J]. 测绘学报, 2009, 38(5): 466-469. HUANG Xianfeng, LI Hui, WANG Xiao, et al. Filter Algorithms of Airborne LiDAR Data: Review and Prospects[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2009, 38(5): 466-469.
[2] 王竞雪, 朱庆, 王伟玺. 多匹配基元集成的多视影像密集匹配方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2013, 42(5): 691-698. WANG Jingxue, ZHU Qing, WANG Weixi. A Dense Matching Algorithm of Multi-view Image Based on the Integrated Multiple Matching Primitives[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2013, 42(5): 691-698.
[3] 张小红. 机载激光雷达测量技术理论与方法[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2007. ZHANG Xiaohong. Theories, Methods of Airborne LiDAR Technique[M]. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2007.
[4] SITHOLE G,VOSSELMAN G.Experimental Comparison of Filter Algorithms for Bare-earth Extraction from Airborne Laser Scanning Point Clouds[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2004, 59(1-2): 85-101.
[5] MENG Xuelian, CURRIT N, ZHAO Kaiguang. Ground Filtering Algorithms for Airborne LiDAR Data: A Review of Critical Issues[J]. Remote Sensing, 2010, 2(3): 833-860.
[6] AXELSSON P E. DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models[J]. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2000, 33: 110-117.
[7] 隋立春, 张熠斌, 张硕, 等. 基于渐进三角网的机载LiDAR点云数据滤波[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2011, 36(10): 1159-1163. SUI Lichun, ZHANG Yibin, ZHANG Shuo, et al. Filtering of Airborne LiDAR Point Cloud Data Based on Progressive TIN[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2011, 36(10): 1159-1163.
[8] BRIESE C, PFEIFER N, DORNINGER P. Applications of the Robust Interpolation for DTM Determination[J]. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2002, 34: 55-61.
[9] SITHOLE G. Filtering of Laser Altimetry Data Using a Slope Adaptive Filter[J]. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2001, 34: 203-210.
[10] ZHANG Keqi, CHEN Shuching, WHITMAN D, et al. A Progressive Morphological Filter for Removing Nonground Measurements from Airborne LiDAR Data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(4): 872-882.
[11] TÓVÁRI D, PFEIFER N. Segmentation Based Robust Interpolation-A New Approach to Laser Data Filtering[J]. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2005, 36: 79-84.
[12] ZHANG Jixian, LIN Xiangguo. Filtering Airborne LiDAR Data By Embedding Smoothness-constrained Segmentation in Progressive TIN Densification[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2013, 81: 44-59.
[13] 唐菲菲, 刘经南, 张小红, 等. 基于体素的森林地区机载LiDAR数据DTM提取[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(1): 55-59. TANG Feifei, LIU Jingnan, ZHANG Xiaohong, et al. A Voxel-based Filtering Algorithm for DTM Data Extraction in Forest Areas[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(1): 55-59.
[14] 郑辑涛, 张涛. 基于可变半径圆环和B样条拟合的机载LiDAR点云滤波[J]. 测绘学报, 2015, 44(12): 1359-1366. DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20140514. ZHENG Jitao, ZHANG Tao.Filtering of Airborne LiDAR Point Cloud Based on Variable Radius Circle and B-spline Fitting[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2015, 44(12): 1359-1366. DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20140514.
[15] FILIN S, PFEIFER N. Segmentation of Airborne Laser Scanning Data Using A Slope Adaptive Neighborhood[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2006, 60(2): 71-80.
[16] LOHMANN P. Segmentation and Filtering of Laser Scanner Digital Surface Models[J]. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2002, 34(Pt 3): 311-315.
[17] CHEN Z, XU B, GAO B. An Image-segmentation-based Urban DTM Generation Method Using Airborne LiDAR Data[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing, 2016, 9(1): 496-506.
[18] SITHOLE G, VOSSELMAN G. Filtering of Airborne Laser Scanner Data based on Segmented Point Clouds[J]. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2005, 36: 66-71.
[19] SHEN J,LIU J P,LIN X G,et al.Object-based Classification of Airborne Light Detection and Ranging Point Clouds in Human Settlements[J]. Sensor Letters, 2012, 10(1-2): 221-229.
[20] YAN Menglong,BLASCHKE T,LIU Yu,et al.An Object-based Analysis Filtering Algorithm for Airborne Laser Scanning[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2012, 33(22): 7099-7116.
[21] LIN Xiangguo, ZHANG Jixian. Segmentation-based Filtering of Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds By Progressive Densification of Terrain Segments[J]. Remote Sensing, 2014, 6(2): 1294-1326.
[22] XU S, VOSSELMAN G, ELBERINK O S. Multiple-Entity Based Classification of Airborne Laser Scanning Data in Urban Areas[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2014, 88: 1-15.
[23] RABBANI T. Automatic Reconstruction of Industrial Installations Using Point Clouds and Images[D]. Delft, the Netherlands:Netherlands Commission of Geodesy, 2006.
[24] ARYA S, MOUNT D M, NETANYAHU N S, et al. An Optimal Algorithm for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Searching Fixed Dimensions[J]. Journal of the ACM, 1998, 45(6): 891-923.
[25] 官云兰, 程效军, 施贵刚. 一种稳健的点云数据平面拟合方法[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 36(7): 981-984. GUAN Yunlan, CHENG Xiaojun, SHI Guigang. A Robust Method for Fitting a Plane to Point Clouds[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2008, 36(7): 981-984.
[26] EDELSBRUNNER H, KIRKPATRICK D, SEIDEL R. On the Shape of A Set of Points in the Plane[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1983, 29(4): 551-559.
[27] 亢晓琛, 刘纪平, 林祥国. 多核处理器的机载激光雷达点云并行三角网渐进加密滤波方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2013, 42(3): 331-336. KANG Xiaochen, LIU Jiping, LIN Xiangguo. Parallel Filter of Progressive TIN Densification for Airborne LiDAR Point Cloud Using Multi-core CPU[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2013, 42(3): 331-336.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉