地理信息数据分级评价的相对指数熵模型

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20190528

测绘学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (11): 1497-1505.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20190528

地理信息数据分级评价的相对指数熵模型

肖佳^1,2, 田沁^3,4, 何宗宜⁵

1. 华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院, 湖北武汉 430079;
2. 华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430079;
3. 深圳市数字城市工程研究中心, 广东深圳 518034;
4. 自然资源部城市国土资源监测与仿真重点实验室, 广东深圳 518034;
5. 武汉大学资源与环境科学学院, 湖北武汉 430079

收稿日期:2019-07-04 修回日期:2019-12-12 发布日期:2020-11-25
作者简介:肖佳(1987-),男,讲师,研究方向为地理空间语义、地图综合和深度学习。E-mail:jiaxiao@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费（CCNU30106190127）

Relative exponential entropy model on classification evaluation of geographic information data

XIAO Jia^1,2, TIAN Qin^3,4, HE Zongyi⁵

1. School of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis&Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China;
3. Shenzhen Research Center of Digital City Engineering, Shenzhen 518034, China;
4. Laboratory of Urban Land Resources Monitoring and Simulation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shenzhen 518034, China;
5. School of Resource and Environment Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received:2019-07-04 Revised:2019-12-12 Published:2020-11-25
Supported by:
The Self-determined Research Funds of CCNU from the Colleges' Basic Research and Operation of MOE (No. CCNU30106190127)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提出了一种基于相对指数熵的地理信息数据分级评价模型，构建级内相对指数熵与级间指数熵指标，分别量化分级数据级别内集聚水平和级别间的离散水平，并利用这两个指标构建了地理信息数据分级的相对指数熵评价指标。在Python中实现地理信息数据分级以及分级的相对指数熵计算。试验中，应用5种常用的分级方法对5种典型分布的6个数据集以及1个人口普查数据集进行分级，并分别计算分级结果的相对指数熵指标。试验结果表明，在面向不同分布的数据集时，相对指数熵指标能够很好地指示出最优分级方法，并且反映出不同分级方法的细小差异，对于地理信息数据分级的评价是有效的。

关键词: 相对指数熵, 地理信息数据分级, 分级评价模型, 人口普查数据

Abstract: In this paper, we propose an evaluation model of geographic information data classification based on relative exponential entropy. The internal relative exponential entropy of class and external exponential entropy among classes are designed to respectively quantify the agglomeration level of the data within each class and the discrete level among classes. With these two indexes, the relative exponential entropy of geographic information data classification is constructed. We implement the classification of the geographic information data and relative exponential entropy calculation of the classification in the Python platform, based on which the experiments are conducted. Six datasets of 5 classical distributions and a census dataset are classified with 5 frequently-used classification methods and the relative exponential entropies of the classifications are calculated. The experimental results demonstrate that when facing different distributed data the relative exponential entropy index could well indicate the optimal classification method. Meanwhile, the relative exponential entropy could reflect the tiny differences of different classification methods. The relative exponential entropy proves to be valid for the evaluation of geographic information data classification.

Key words: relative exponential entropy, geographic information data classification, classification evaluation model, census data

中图分类号:

P208

肖佳, 田沁, 何宗宜. 地理信息数据分级评价的相对指数熵模型[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(11): 1497-1505.

XIAO Jia, TIAN Qin, HE Zongyi. Relative exponential entropy model on classification evaluation of geographic information data[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2020, 49(11): 1497-1505.

参考文献

[1] 陆效中. 统计地图的分级表示法[M]. 北京:解放军出版社, 1989. LU Xiaozhong. Classification representation of statistic maps[M]. Beijing:The PLA Press, 1989.
[2] JENKS G F. Generalization in statistical mapping[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1963, 53(1):15-26.
[3] JIANG Bin. Head/Tail breaks:a new classification scheme for data with a heavy-tailed distribution[J]. The Professional Geographer, 2013, 65(3):482-494. DOI:10.1080/00330124.2012.700499.
[4] 江南, 白小双, 孙娟娟. 基于多属性决策的统计数据分级评价模型[J]. 测绘学报, 2007, 36(2):198-202. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1595.2007.02.015. JIANG Nan, BAI Xiaoshuang, SUN Juanjuan. Classification evaluation model of statistic data based on multiattribute decision-making[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2007, 36(2):198-202. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1595.2007.02.015.
[5] 孙亚梅, 王如云. 专题要素分级的新方法及其应用[J]. 测绘学报, 1994, 23(1):59-66. SUN Yamei, WANG Ruyun. A new grading method and its application in grading of thematic elements[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 1994, 23(1):59-66.
[6] 何宗宜. 地图数据处理模型的原理与方法[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2004. HE Zongyi. Elements and methods of model for cartographical data processing[M]. Wuhan:Wuhan University Press, 2004.
[7] ARMSTRONG M P, XIAO Ningchuan, BENNETT D A. Using genetic algorithms to create multicriteria class intervals for choropleth maps[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003, 93(3):595-623.
[8] 郭庆胜, 李留所, 贾玉明, 等. 顾及空间自相关的统计数据分级质量评价[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2006, 31(3):240-243, 251. GUO Qingsheng, LI Liusuo, JIA Yuming, et al. Quality evaluation of statistical data classification considering spatial autocorrelation[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2006, 31(3):240-243, 251.
[9] 姚宇婕, 陈毓芬. 引导型专题数据分级处理研究[J]. 测绘工程, 2012, 21(1):25-29. YAO Yujie, CHEN Yufen. Research on guiding thematic data classification[J]. Engineering of Surveying and Mapping, 2012, 21(1):25-29.
[10] CROMLEY R G, MROZINSKI R D. An evaluation of classification schemes based on the statistical versus the spatial structure properties of geographic distributions in choropleth mapping[C]//Proceedings of 1997 ACSM/ASPRS Annual Convention & Exposition. Seattle:American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 1997:76-85.
[11] BREWER C A, PICKLE L. Evaluation of methods for classifying epidemiological data on choropleth maps in series[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2002, 92(4):662-681.
[12] EICHER C L, BREWER C A. Dasymetric mapping and areal interpolation:implementation and evaluation[J]. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2001, 28(2):125-138.
[13] SUN Min, WONG D, KRONENFELD B. A heuristic multi-criteria classification approach incorporating data quality information for choropleth mapping[J]. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2017, 44(3):246-258.
[14] SUN Min, WONG D W, KRONENFELD B J. A classification method for choropleth maps incorporating data reliability information[J]. The Professional Geographer, 2015, 67(1):72-83.
[15] KOO H, CHUN Yongwan, GRIFFITH D A. Optimal map classification incorporating uncertainty information[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2017, 107(3):575-590.
[16] MU Wangshu, TONG Daoqin. Choropleth mapping with uncertainty:a maximum likelihood-based classification scheme[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2019, 109(5):1493-1510.
[17] CHUN Yongwan, KOO H, GRIFFITH D A. A comparison of optimal map classification methods incorporating uncertainty information[C]//BAILLY J S, GRIFFITH D, JOSSELIN D. Proceedings of Spatial Accuracy 2016. Avignon, France:International Spatial Accuracy Research Association, 2016:20-22.
[18] WEI Ran, GRUBESIC T H. An alternative classification scheme for uncertain attribute mapping[J]. The Professional Geographer, 2017, 69(4):604-615.
[19] 李志林, 刘启亮, 高培超. 地图信息论:从狭义到广义的发展回顾[J]. 测绘学报, 2016, 45(7):757-767. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20160235. LI Zhilin, LIU Qiliang, GAO Peichao. Entropy-based cartographic communication models:evolution from special to general cartographic information theory[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2016, 45(7):757-767. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20160235.
[20] SUKHOV V I. Information capacity of a map entropy[J]. Geodesy and Aerophotography, 1967, X(5):212-215.
[21] 王少一, 王昭, 杜清运. 顾及地图要素级别的几何信息量量测方法[J]. 测绘科学, 2007, 32(4):60-62. WANG Shaoyi, WANG Zhao, DU Qingyun. A measurement method of geometrical information considering multi-level map feature[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2007, 32(4):60-62.
[22] 邓敏, 樊子德, 刘慧敏. 层次信息量的线要素化简算法评价研究[J]. 测绘学报, 2013, 42(5):767-773, 781. DENG Min, FAN Zide, LIU Huimin. Performance evaluation of line simplification algorithms based on hierarchical information content[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2013, 42(5):767-773, 781.
[23] 艾廷华, 何亚坤, 杜欣. GIS数据尺度变换中的信息熵变化[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2015, 31(2):7-11. AI Tinghua, HE Yakun, DU Xin. Information entropy change in GIS data scale transformation[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2015, 31(2):7-11.
[24] BJØRKE J T. Exploration of information theoretic arguments for the limited amount of information in a map[J]. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2012, 39(2):88-97.
[25] SHANNON C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. The Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(4):623-656.
[26] PAL S K, PAL N R. Object-background classification using a new definition of entropy[C]//Proceedings of 1988 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Beijing:IEEE, 1988:773-776.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

510

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	35	0	0	475

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	503	7
比例	99%	1%

摘要

878

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	878

	来源	本网站

	次数	878
	比例	100%

地理信息数据分级评价的相对指数熵模型

Relative exponential entropy model on classification evaluation of geographic information data

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘经南, 罗亚荣, 郭迟, 高柯夫. PNT智能与智能PNT[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(6): 811-828.
[2]	韩李涛, 周丽娟, 龚城, 张爱国. 顾及步行习惯的室内导航网络及其生成算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(5): 729-738.
[3]	方金凤, 孟祥福. 基于LBSN和多图融合的兴趣点推荐[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(5): 739-749.
[4]	张睿卓. 基于多源数据的林区电力走廊安全风险评估方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(5): 784-784.
[5]	夏吉喆, 周颖, 李珍, 李帆, 乐阳, 程涛, 李清泉. 城市时空大数据驱动的新型冠状病毒传播风险评估——以粤港澳大湾区为例[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(6): 671-680.
[6]	朱庆, 冯斌, 李茂粟, 陈媚特, 徐肇文, 谢潇, 张叶廷, 刘铭崴, 黄志勤, 冯义从. 面向动态关联数据的高效稀疏图索引方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(6): 681-691.
[7]	陆川伟, 孙群, 陈冰, 温伯威, 赵云鹏, 徐立. 车辆轨迹数据的道路学习提取法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(6): 692-702.
[8]	尹烁, 闫小明, 晏雄锋. 基于特征边重构的建筑物化简方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(6): 703-710.
[9]	吴华意, 黄蕊, 游兰, 向隆刚. 出租车轨迹数据挖掘进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(11): 1341-1356.
[10]	郭庆胜, 刘洋, 李萌, 程晓茜, 何捷, 王慧慧, 魏智威. 基于网格模型的导航道路图渐进式化简方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(11): 1357-1368.
[11]	吴政, 武鹏达, 李成名. 对等网络下自适应层级的矢量数据时空索引构建方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(11): 1369-1379.
[12]	王培晓, 张恒才, 王海波, 吴升. ST-CFSFDP:快速搜索密度峰值的时空聚类算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(11): 1380-1390.
[13]	万子健, 李连营, 杨敏, 周校东. 车辆轨迹数据提取道路交叉口特征的决策树模型[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(11): 1391-1403.
[14]	胡光辉, 熊礼阳, 汤国安. DEM地表坡向变率的向量几何计算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(11): 1404-1414.
[15]	张旭, 郝向阳, 李建胜, 李朋月. 监控视频中动态目标与地理空间信息的融合与可视化方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(11): 1415-1423.