不同Klobuchar模型参数的性能比较

doi:10.13485/j.cnki.11-2089.2014.0176

测绘学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 1151-1157.doi: 10.13485/j.cnki.11-2089.2014.0176

不同Klobuchar模型参数的性能比较

王斐¹,²,吴晓莉¹,³,周田¹,李宇翔¹

1. 北京卫星导航中心
2. 清华大学
3. 北京环球信息应用开发中心

收稿日期:2013-12-05 修回日期:2014-03-20 出版日期:2014-11-20 发布日期:2014-12-02
通讯作者: 王斐 E-mail:wakenforest@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学青年基金;国家高技术研究发展计划;第三届中国卫星导航学术年会青年优秀论文资助课题

Performance Comparison between Different Klobuchar Model Parameters

WANG Fei¹,²,⁴,WU Xiaoli¹,³,⁴,LI Yuxiang¹,⁴, ¹,⁴

1. Beijing Navigation Center
2. Tsinghua University
3.
4. Beijing navigation center

Received:2013-12-05 Revised:2014-03-20 Online:2014-11-20 Published:2014-12-02
Contact: WANG Fei E-mail:wakenforest@126.com
Supported by:
;National High Technology Research and Development Program of China

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对于GPS单频用户而言，电离层延迟是最重要的误差来源之一。GPS系统使用Klobuchar模型对电离层延迟进行改正，其改正数从370组常数中选取。目前全球分布的GPS测站可以获得高精度的全球电离层监测结果，GPS为什么不发播采用实测数据计算得到的Klobuchar模型参数呢？本文针对这一问题进行分析。首先对欧洲定轨中心CODE提供的全球电离层图GIM预报COPG电离层进行精度评估，然后根据COPG电离层进行Klobuchar模型参数拟合并利用IGS提供的事后高精度电离层图进行精度分析，最后将不同的电离层模型参数应用于单点定位以评估其对单频用户的影响。分析结果表明：受8参数的Klobuchar模型本身结构限制，采用全球实测数据计算的电离层模型参数与导航电文中发播的电离层模型精度相当，为55%左右。而仅采用地磁纬度45oS以北的数据拟合得到的模型参数，其电离层改正精度有明显提升，可达65%左右，但其对单频用户定位精度改善不明显。本文研究结果为我国全球电离层建模提供参考。

关键词: Klobuchar模型, GPS, 电离层延迟, 全球电离层图

Abstract:

To GPS single-frequency user, the ionospheric delay is one of the most important sources of errors. GPS uses Klobuchar model to correct the ionospheric delay whose corrections come from 370 groups of constants derived from empirical models and historical data. Currently stations distributed all over the world can provide ionosphere monitoring results with high precision, why GPS doesn’t broadcast Klobuchar model parameters calculated with observed data? This article focuses on this question. Firstly estimating the precision of predicted global ionosphere maps, COPG, provided by Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE). Secondly we fit the Klobuchar model parameters with COPG. Then we assess the parameters’ precision with global ionosphere maps provided by IGS. Finally we do single point positioning using different Klobuchar parameters to evaluate their influences on GPS single-frequency users. Results show that restricted by Klobuchar model with 8 parameters, precision of parameters fitted using global observed data is just equal with GPS broadcast parameters, both around 55%. On the other hand, precision of model parameters fitted using data on the north of geomagnetic latitude 45oS is much higher, which arrives about 65%, but it performs no better in positioning of single-frequency users. Results in this article provide reference to ionosphere modeling of our nation.

Key words: Klobuchar model, GPS, ionosphere delay, GIM

中图分类号:

P228.4

王斐吴晓莉周田李宇翔. 不同Klobuchar模型参数的性能比较[J]. 测绘学报, 2014, 43(11): 1151-1157.

WANG Fei WU Xiaoli LI Yuxiang. Performance Comparison between Different Klobuchar Model Parameters[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2014, 43(11): 1151-1157.

参考文献

[1]Hernández-Pajares M, Juan J.M. Sanz J. et al..The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998.[J].J Geod,, 2009, , 83(-):263-275 [2]余明，郭际明，过静珺.GPS电离层延迟Klobuchar模型与双频数据解算值的比较与分析.[J].测绘通报, 2004, 6(-):5-8 [3]RUAN Rengui, WU Xianbing, FENG Laiping, et al.Single-Frequency Precise Point Positioning with Simultaneous Ionospheric Delay Estimation[J].Acta Geodaetica et Gartographica Sinica, 2012, 41(4):490-495 [4]Jin, S.G.,Luo,OF.,Park,P. GPS observations of the ionospheric F2-layer behavior during the 20th November 2003 geomagnetic storm over South Korea[J].J Geod, 2008, 82(12):883-892 [5]Jin, S.G., Han, L., Cho, J. .Lower atmospheric anomalies following the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake observed by GPS measurements.[J].Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys, 2011, 73(-):810-814 [6]YUAN Yunbin, OU Jikun.A New Method on Ionospheric Delay Correction for Single Frequency GPS Users in WAAS[J].Acta Geodaetica et Gartographica Sinica, 2000, 29(S):96-102 [7]XIANG Shulan, HE Xiaowei, MOU Qifeng.Research of Ionospheric Delay from Klobuchar and IRI Model[J].Microcomputer Information, 2008, 1(6):200-202 [8]FAN Guoqing, WANG Wei, XI Xiaoning.Modeling of Ionosphere VTEC Using Generalized Regression Neural Network[J].Acta Geodaetica et Gartographica Sinica, 2010, 39(1):16-21 [9]YUAN Y, HUO X, OU J, et al.Refining the Klobuchar ionospheric coefficients based on GPS observations.[J].IEEE Transaction on Aerospace and Electronic System, 2008, AES-44(-):1498-1510 [10]LI Zhenghang, HUANG Jingsong, et al.GPS Surveying and Data Processing[M], Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2005. 52-58. (李征航，黄劲松等，GPS测量与数据处理，武汉大学出版社，2005. 52-58.) [11]LI Zhenghang, ZHANG Xiaohong, et al.New Techniques and Precise Data Processing Methods of Satellite Navigation and Positioning[M], Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2009. 58-63. (李征航，张小红，卫星导航定位新技术及高精度数据处理方法，武汉大学出版社，2009. 58-63.) [12]KLOUBUCHAR JA.Ionospheric Delay Algorithm for Single-frequency GPS Users[J].IEEE Transaction on Aerospace and Electronic System, 1988, AES-23(3):321-331 [13]ZHANG Hongping.Study on GPS based China Regional Ionosphere Monitoring and Ionosphere Delay Correction[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Science, 2006. 66-86. (章红平. 基于地基GPS的中国区域电离层监测与延迟改正研究[D]. 上海:中国科学院上海天文台, 2006. 66-86.) [14]HUANG Yidan, WANG Mingyuan, HAN Ling, et al.Improvements on Klobuchar Model Based on Chinese Ionospheric Data. Nineteenth Conference of Chinese Society of Space Research, Space Exploration Committee, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China, 2006:759-766. (黄逸丹，王明远，韩玲等. 基于中国电离层资料对Klobuchar模型的改进[C]. 中国空间科学学会空间探测专业委员会第十九次学术会议, 中国浙江宁波, 2006:759-766.) [15]WU Xiaoli, HU Xiaogong, WANG Gang,. Evaluation of Compass Ionospheric Model in GNSS Positioning.[J].Advance in Space Research, 2012, 51(6):959-968 [16]Jorgensen, P.S..An Assessment of Ionospheric Effects on the User.[J].NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1989, 36(2):--- [17]LIU Jingnan, YE Shirong.刘经南，叶世榕，非差相位精密单点定位技术探讨[J].武汉大学学报信息科学版, 2002, 27(3):234-240 [18]YI Zhonghai, CHEN Yongqi, ZHU Jianjun, DAI Wujiao, An Approach to Regional Real Time Precisse Point Positioning Based on IGS Ultra-rapid Orbit[J.易重海，陈永奇，朱建军，戴吾蛟，一种基于超快速星历的区域性实时精密单点定位方法[J].测绘学报, 2011, 4(2):226-231 [19]WU Xiaoli, PING Jingsong, LIU Li, XING Nan, Hardware Delay Solution of Regional Satellite Navigation System[J], Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University.吴晓莉，平劲松，刘利，邢楠，区域导航系统硬件延迟解算[J].武汉大学学报信息科学版, 2011, 36(10):1218-1221 [20]秘金钟，李玮，谷守周.精密单点定位用户自主式完备性监测算法[J].测绘学报, 2011, 40(S):63-67 [21]Elliott D.Kaplan, Christopher J.Hegarty. Understanding GPS Principles and Applications, Second Edition[M], Artech House, 2006. 224-239

不同Klobuchar模型参数的性能比较

Performance Comparison between Different Klobuchar Model Parameters

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨凯淳, 吕志平, 李林阳, 邝英才, 许炜, 郑茜. 附加历元间约束的滑动窗单频实时精密单点定位算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(5): 648-657.
[2]	李博峰, 秦园阳, 陈广鄂. 基于无几何电离层滤波模型的北斗三号系统相位周跳与中断修复方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(4): 501-510.
[3]	徐龙威, 吴忠望, 董绪荣. GLONASS频间码偏差实时估计方法及其在RTK定位中的应用[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(2): 169-181.
[4]	刘晗, 魏辉, 邹贤才. GRACE Follow-On卫星的星载GNSS相位测速法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(12): 1772-1779.
[5]	赵静, 占伟, 任金卫, 江在森, 顾铁, 刘杰, 牛安福, 苑争一. 汶川地震后龙门山断层中段愈合过程的GPS时间序列反演[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(1): 37-51.
[6]	周锋, 徐天河. GPS/BDS/Galileo三频精密单点定位模型及性能分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(1): 61-70.
[7]	祝会忠, 雷啸挺, 徐爱功, 李军, 高猛. 顾及GEO卫星约束的长距离BDS三频整周模糊度解算[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(9): 1222-1234.
[8]	梁月吉, 任超, 黄仪邦, 潘亚龙, 张志刚. 利用GPS-IR监测土壤湿度的多星线性回归反演模型[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(7): 833-842.
[9]	祝会忠, 李军, 蔚泽然, 张凯, 徐爱功. 长距离GPS/BDS参考站网多频载波相位整周模糊度解算方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(3): 300-311.
[10]	何振宇, 陈武, 杨扬. GPS天-地无源双基地雷达探测海面移动目标[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(12): 1523-1534.
[11]	陈正生, 张清华, 李林阳, 李雪瑞, 吕浩. 电离层延迟变化自模型化的载波相位平滑伪距算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(9): 1107-1118.
[12]	姚朝龙, 罗志才, 胡月明, 王长委, 张瑞, 李金明. 利用GPS垂向位移监测西南地区干旱事件[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(5): 547-554.
[13]	唐炉亮, 戴领, 任畅, 张霞. 现实与赛博空间数据相结合的城市活动事件时空建模[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(5): 618-629.
[14]	邬群勇, 吴祖飞, 张良盼. 出租车GPS轨迹集聚和精细化路网提取[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(4): 502-511.
[15]	唐炉亮, 阚子涵, 任畅, 张霞, 李清泉. 利用GPS轨迹的转向级交通拥堵精细分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(1): 75-85.