利用GNSS数据结合NeQuick模型优化磁暴期F2层临界频率参数估计

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20180260

测绘学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 14-23.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20180260

利用GNSS数据结合NeQuick模型优化磁暴期F2层临界频率参数估计

韩玲¹, 王解先¹, 陈艳玲², 柳景斌³, 李浩军¹

1. 同济大学测绘与地理信息学院, 上海 200092;
2. 中国科学院上海天文台, 上海 200030;
3. 武汉大学测绘遥感信息工程国家重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430079

收稿日期:2018-06-22 修回日期:2019-09-18 发布日期:2020-01-16
通讯作者: 王解先 E-mail:wangjiexian@tongji.edu.cn
作者简介:韩玲(1980-),女,博士生,研究方向为GNSS电离层建模、监测与应用。E-mail:1310892@tongji.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41674029；41174023）

Optimized estimation of foF2 using GNSS data ingestion to NeQuick model during magnetic storm

HAN Ling¹, WANG Jiexian¹, CHEN Yanling², LIU Jingbin³, LI Haojun¹

1. College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Shanghai 200030, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Information Engineering for Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received:2018-06-22 Revised:2019-09-18 Published:2020-01-16
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41674029;41174023)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： F2层临界频率foF2是高频通信的重要参数，目前获取F2层临界频率（foF2）最有效的手段是电离层测高仪，但磁暴期间电离层自身剧烈变化会造成测高仪foF2数据严重缺失。经验模型如NeQuick虽能给出foF2估计值，但磁暴期精度却不及磁静日水平。本文选取2015年12月19日至2015年12月22日磁暴期中国地壳运动监测网GNSS双频数据进行区域建模并估算出电子总含量（total electron content，TEC），利用实测区域TEC对NeQuick模型有效电离参数Az进行估计，得出NeQuick模型优化后TEC总含量和F2层临界频率foF2，并反演出磁暴期初相，主相及恢复相阶段变化过程。以中国地区台站实测数据作为参考对比，结果表明：GNSS数据优化后的NeQuick模型TEC精度大概提升了20%~40%，foF2的实时精度提升了10%~25%。GNSS优化后NeQuick模型能准确反演出电离层的由正相暴转为负相暴演化过程，而原始模型由于仅依赖于输入的太阳活动水平，只能反映出与磁静日水平相当的日变化趋势值。利用该方法可以有效提高磁暴期TEC和foF2的经验模型的计算精度，特别是弥补磁暴期foF2数据缺失的不足，可以作为磁暴期电离层垂直探测仪的有益补充或者有效参考。

关键词: NeQuick模型, 电离层, GNSS, 电子总含量, F2层临界频率, 磁暴

Abstract: The critical frequency of F2 is an important parameter for high frequency communications. Ionosonde measured foF2 is an effective way but it would be affected by geomagnetic storm which will even lead to the data missing. NeQuick model could estimate the TEC and foF2.But the accuracy would be degraded during geomagnetic storm. Using the dual frequency GNSS data from the CMONOC(Crustal Movement Observation Network of China)and applying the regional polynomial model, the accurate TEC could be retrieved. Based on the condition that the sum of the squared errors is the minimum, the effective ionized parameter Az could be estimated using the calculated TEC. Using the NeQuick model input by ionized parameter Az, the TEC and foF2 could be retrieved. Using the observations of five ionosonde stations located in different latitudes is in China, the result indicated that the TEC RMS improved 20%~40%, and the foF2 RMS improved 10%~25%. This method could improve the TEC and foF2 accuracy. It showed the benefit of low cost. So it could be considered as the alternative way to the ionosonde observations especially for the foF2 data missing period.

Key words: NeQuick model, ionosphere, GNSS, total electron content, foF2, geomagnetic storm

中图分类号:

P228

韩玲, 王解先, 陈艳玲, 柳景斌, 李浩军. 利用GNSS数据结合NeQuick模型优化磁暴期F2层临界频率参数估计[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(1): 14-23.

HAN Ling, WANG Jiexian, CHEN Yanling, LIU Jingbin, LI Haojun. Optimized estimation of foF2 using GNSS data ingestion to NeQuick model during magnetic storm[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2020, 49(1): 14-23.

参考文献

[1] 熊年禄, 唐存琛, 李行健. 电离层物理概论[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 1999:197-206. XIONG Nianlu, TANG Cunchen, LI Xingjian. The ionosphere physics probability[M]. Wuhan:Wuhan University Press, 1999:197-206.
[2] GULYAEVA T L. Empirical model of ionospheric storm effects on the F₂ layer peak height associated with changes of peak electron density[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Space Physics, 2012, 117(A2):A02302.
[3] WEN Debao, YUAN Yunbin, OU Jikun, et al. Ionospheric response to the geomagnetic storm on August 21, 2003 over China using GNSS-based tomographic technique[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(8):3212-3217.
[4] 孙文杰, 宁百齐, 赵必强, 等. 2015年3月磁暴期间中国中低纬地区电离层变化分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(1):1-10. SUN Wenjie, NING Baiqi, ZHAO Biqiang, et al. Analysis of ionospheric features in middle and low latitude region of China during the geomagnetic storm in March 2015[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60(1):1-10.
[5] 杨鼎, 方涵先, 杨升高, 等. 磁暴期间全球TEC扰动特性分析[J]. 空间科学学报, 2017, 37(5):524-530. YANG Ding, FANG Hanxian, YANG Shenggao, et al. Statistical study on the response of TEC to geomagnetic storms[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2017, 37(5):524-530.
[6] 张奇伟, 郭兼善, 章公亮, 等. 不同类型磁暴和中低纬电离层暴的关系[J]. 地球物理学报, 1995, 38(5):581-589. ZHANG Qiwei, GUO Jianshan, ZHANG Gongliang, et al. Mid-and low-latitude ionospheric responses to different type of magnetic storm[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 1995, 38(5):581-589.
[7] 万德焕, 黄江, 徐杰, 等. 中国低纬地区foF2实测数据缺失的分布特征研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(5):2071-2081. WAN Dehuan, HUANG Jiang, XU Jie, et al. A statistical analysis of occurrence characteristics of missed-foF2 observations over low-latitude region of China[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2015, 30(5):2071-2081.
[8] 王宁波, 袁运斌, 李子申, 等. 不同NeQuick电离层模型参数的应用精度分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(4):421-429. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20160400. WANG Ningbo, YUAN Yunbin, LI Zishen, et al. Performance analysis of different NeQuick ionospheric model parameters[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2017, 46(4):421-429. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20160400.
[9] SSESSANGA N, KIM Y H, KIM E, et al. Regional optimization of the IRI-2012 output (TEC, foF2) by using derived GPS-TEC[J]. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2015, 66(10):1599-1610.
[10] NAVA B, COÏSSON P, MIRÓ AMARANTE G, et al. A model assisted ionospheric electron density reconstruction method based on vertical TEC data ingestion[J]. Annals of Geophysics, 2005, 48(2):313-320.
[11] YU Xiao, SHE Chengli, LIU Dun, et al. A preliminary study of the NeQuick model over China using GPS TEC and ionosonde data[C]//Proceedings of ISAPE2012. Xi'an. China:IEEE, 2012:627-630.
[12] 袁运斌, 欧吉坤. GPS观测数据中的仪器偏差对确定电离层延迟的影响及处理方法[J]. 测绘学报, 1999, 28(2):110-114. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1595.1999.02.001. YUAN Yunbin, OU Jikun. The effects of instrumental bias in GPS observations on determining ionospheric delays and the methods of its calibration[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 1999, 28(2):110-114. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1595.1999.02.001.
[13] SCHAER S. Mapping and predicting the earth's ionosphere using the global positioning system[D]. Switzerland:Bern University.
[14] 章红平, 施闯, 唐卫明. 地基GPS区域电离层多项式模型与硬件延迟统一解算分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2008, 33(8):805-809. ZHANG Hongping, SHI Chuang, TANG Weiming. United solution to polynomial VTEC modeling and DCB analysis using ground-based GPS observations[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2008, 33(8):805-809.
[15] ITU. Recommendation ITU-R P.1239-2. ITU-R reference ionospheric characteristics[R]. Geneva:ITU, 2009.
[16] European Commission. Ionospheric correction algorithm for Galileo single frequency users[R].[S.l.]:European Commission, 2015.

利用GNSS数据结合NeQuick模型优化磁暴期F2层临界频率参数估计

Optimized estimation of foF2 using GNSS data ingestion to NeQuick model during magnetic storm

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张克非, 李浩博, 王晓明, 朱丹彤, 何琦敏, 李龙江, 胡安东, 郑南山, 李怀展. 地基GNSS大气水汽探测遥感研究进展和展望[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1172-1191.
[2]	党亚民, 杨强, 王伟, 梁玉可. 基于块体模型的青藏高原及邻区地壳三维构造形变分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1192-1205.
[3]	袁运斌, 侯鹏宇, 张宝成. GNSS非差非组合数据处理与PPP-RTK高精度定位[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1225-1238.
[4]	金双根, 汪奇生, 史奇奇. 单频到五频多系统GNSS精密单点定位参数估计与应用[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1239-1248.
[5]	李星星, 张伟, 袁勇强, 张柯柯, 吴家齐, 娄嘉庆, 李婕, 郑鸿杰. GNSS卫星精密定轨综述:现状、挑战与机遇[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1271-1293.
[6]	孙中苗, 管斌, 翟振和, 欧阳明达. 海洋卫星测高及其反演全球海洋重力场和海底地形模型研究进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(6): 923-934.
[7]	姚宜斌, 赵庆志. GNSS对流层水汽监测研究进展与展望[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(6): 935-952.
[8]	杨凯淳, 吕志平, 李林阳, 邝英才, 许炜, 郑茜. 附加历元间约束的滑动窗单频实时精密单点定位算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(5): 648-657.
[9]	李博峰, 秦园阳, 陈广鄂. 基于无几何电离层滤波模型的北斗三号系统相位周跳与中断修复方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(4): 501-510.
[10]	邓志国, 王君刚, 葛茂荣. GBM快速轨道产品及非差模糊度固定对其精度的改进[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(4): 544-555.
[11]	汤俊, 高鑫, 李垠健, 钟正宇. 2018年8月磁暴期间北斗GEO卫星电离层TEC时空变化分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(3): 317-326.
[12]	赵庆志, 杜正, 姚顽强, 姚宜斌. GNSS约束的MERSI/FY-3A PWV校准方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(2): 159-168.
[13]	王洁, 王娜子, 徐天河, 高凡, 贺匀峤. 组合GNSS观测值反演海面高度[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(2): 201-211.
[14]	何秀凤, 詹伟, 施宏凯. 顾及边界信号及垂直约束的GNSS水汽层析方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(7): 853-862.
[15]	邵凯, 张厚喆, 秦显平, 黄志勇, 易彬, 谷德峰. 分布式InSAR编队卫星精密绝对和相对轨道确定[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(5): 580-588.