Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (7): 1170-1177.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2025.20250020

• Geodesy and Navigation • Previous Articles     Next Articles

GNSS pseudo trigonometric leveling method

Jianzhang LI1,2,3(), Haowen YAN1,2,3(), Weifang YANG1,2,3, Xiaoning SU1,2,3   

  1. 1.Faculty of Geomatics, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    2.National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Technologies and Applications for National Geographic State Monitoring, Lanzhou 730070, China
    3.Key Laboratory of Science and Technology in Surveying & Mapping, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2025-01-14 Revised:2025-06-26 Online:2025-08-18 Published:2025-08-18
  • Contact: Haowen YAN E-mail:lijianzhang@mail.lzjtu.cn;haowen2010@gmail.com
  • About author:LI Jianzhang (1974—), male, PhD, associate professor, majors in data processing of high speed railway control network. E-mail: lijianzhang@mail.lzjtu.cn
  • Supported by:
    The National Natural Science Foundation of China(42361073)

Abstract:

A GNSS pseudo trigonometric leveling method is proposed to address the issue of low accuracy in traditional total station trigonometric leveling. This method requires the deployment of a certain number of auxiliary points around the measurement station, the establishment of a zenith direction (opposite direction of vertical line) baseline vector using a precision level and GNSS receiver, and the replacement of the traditional total station line of sight with the GNSS baseline vector. The zenith distance of the target point is obtained through the vector dot product formula, and then the trigonometric leveling measurement value between two points is obtained. GNSS pseudo trigonometric leveling does not require two-point visibility and is not affected by atmospheric refraction, making it particularly suitable for long-distance elevation transmission across obstacles such as rivers, lakes, and valleys. A comparative experiment was conducted on a 3.8 km leveling route using precision leveling measurement and GNSS pseudo trigonometric leveling round-trip measurement. The experimental results showed that the difference between the two methods was less than the second-order leveling detection limit of 11.7 mm.

Key words: pseudo trigonometric leveling, GNSS static measurement, leveling, atmospheric vertical refraction

CLC Number: