Comparison of the Cross-calibration Methods between Image-based and RTM-BRDF for GF-1 Images

  • LI Juan ,
  • FENG Lian ,
  • PANG Xiaoping
Expand
  • 1. Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Polar Science of Surveying and Mapping, National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, Wuhan 430079, China

Received date: 2016-06-28

  Revised date: 2017-06-13

  Online published: 2017-07-25

Supported by

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41671338;41401388)

Abstract

Four wide-field-of-view (WFV) instruments are on board the Gaofen-1 (or GF-1) satellite, providing a combined swath of ~800 km. Before appling to quantitative remote sensing, precision radiometric calibration is needed. Currently, there are two cross-calibration methods. One is the traditional cross-calibration method (image-based), the other is based on radiative transfer model and bidirectional reflectance distribution function(RTM-BRDF). In this study, the two methods were used to cross-calibrate the WFVs of GF-1, and the comparisons were made at the same time. The verification based on satellite data and in situ measurements have shown that, for the two approximately nadir imaging camera WFV2 and WFV3, Image-based method could get higher precision radiometric calibration coefficients, while for two non-nadir imaging cameras WFV1 and WFV4, high precision calibration coefficients would be obtained by the RTM-BRDF method. Finally, the calibration coefficients of GF-1 was derived by the combination of the two methods.

Cite this article

LI Juan , FENG Lian , PANG Xiaoping . Comparison of the Cross-calibration Methods between Image-based and RTM-BRDF for GF-1 Images[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2017 , 46(7) : 882 -890 . DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20160315

References

[1] 韩杰, 谢勇. GF-1卫星WFV影像间匀色方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2016, 45(12): 1423-1433. DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20160248. HAN Jie, XIE Yong. Image Dodging Algorithm for GF-1 Satellite WFV Imagery[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2016, 45(12): 1423-1433. DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20160248.
[2] CHANDER G, MARKHAM B. Revised LandSat-5 TM Radiometric Calibration Procedures and Postcalibration Dynamic Ranges[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(11): 2674-2677.
[3] CHANDER G, MARKHAM B L, HELDER D L. Summary of Current Radiometric Calibration Coefficients for LandSat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI Sensors[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113(5): 893-903.
[4] XIONG Xiaoxiong, BARNES W. An Overview of MODIS Radiometric Calibration and Characterization[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2006, 23(1): 69-79.
[5] GREGG W W, CASEY N W, O'REILLY J E, et al. An Empirical Approach to Ocean Color Data: Reducing Bias and the Need for Post-launch Radiometric Re-calibration[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113(8): 1598-1612.
[6] TEILLET P M, BARKER J L, MARKHAM B L, et al. Radiometric Cross-calibration of the LandSat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-5 TM Sensors Based on Tandem Data Sets[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001, 78(1-2): 39-54.
[7] FENG Lian, LI Juan, GONG Weishu, et al. Radiometric Cross-calibration of Gaofen-1 WFV Cameras Using LandSat-8 OLI Images: A Solution for Large View Angle Associated Problems[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 174: 56-68.
[8] PAHLEVAN N, LEE Z, WEI Jianwei, et al. On-orbit Radiometric Characterization of OLI (LandSat-8) for Applications in Aquatic Remote Sensing[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 154: 272-284.
[9] TEILLET P M, MARKHAM B L, IRISH R R. LandSat Cross-calibration Based on Near Simultaneous Imaging of Common Ground Targets[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006, 102(3-4): 264-270.
[10] LI J, FENG L, PANG X, et al. Radiometric Cross Calibration of Gaofen-1 WFV Cameras Using LandSat-8 OLI Images: A Simple Image-based Method[J]. Remote Sensing, 2016, 8(5): 411.
[11] VANHELLEMONT Q, RUDDICK K. Turbid Wakes Associated with Offshore Wind Turbines Observed with LandSat 8[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 145: 105-115.
[12] VERMOTE E F, TANRE D, DEUZE J L, et al. Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: An Overview[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997, 35(3): 675-686.
[13] VERMOTE E, JUSTICE C O, BREON F M. Towards a Generalized Approach for Correction of the BRDF Effect in MODIS Directional Reflectances[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2009, 47(3): 898-908.
[14] WANNER W, LI X, STRAHLER A H. On the Derivation of Kernels for Kernel-driven Models of Bidirectional Reflectance[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1995, 100(D10): 21077-21089.
[15] LI F, JUPP D L B, REDDY S, et al. An Evaluation of the Use of Atmospheric and BRDF Correction to Standardize LandSat Data[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2010, 3(3): 257-270.
[16] LI F, JUPP D L B, THANKAPPAN M, et al. A Physics-based Atmospheric and BRDF Correction for LandSat Data over Mountainous Terrain[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012, 124: 756-770.
[17] SCHAAF C, STRAHLER A, GAO Feng, et al. Global Albedo, BRDF and Nadir BRDF-adjusted Reflectance Products from MODIS[C]//Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Toronto: IEEE, 2002: 1188-1190.
[18] SCHAAF C B, GAO Feng, STRAHLER A H, et al. First Operational BRDF, Albedo Nadir Reflectance Products from MODIS[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 83(1-2): 135-148.
[19] GAO Caixia, ZHAO Yongguang, LI Chuanrong, et al. An Investigation of a Novel Cross-Calibration Method of FY-3C/VIRR against NPP/VⅡRS in the Dunhuang Test Site[J]. Remote Sensing, 2016, 8(2).
[20] HU Xiuqing, LIU Jingjing, SUN Ling, et al. Characterization of CRCS Dunhuang Test Site and Vicarious Calibration Utilization for Fengyun (FY) Series Sensors[J]. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2010, 36(5): 566-582.
Outlines

/