星蚀期北斗卫星轨道性能分析--SLR检核结果

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20150637

测绘学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 639-645.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20150637

星蚀期北斗卫星轨道性能分析--SLR检核结果

彭汉兵¹, 杨元喜², 王刚³, 何海波³

1. 信息工程大学地理空间信息学院, 河南郑州 450001;
2. 西安测绘研究所地理空间工程国家重点实验室, 陕西西安 710054;
3. 北京卫星导航中心, 北京 100094

收稿日期:2015-12-22 修回日期:2016-03-31 出版日期:2016-06-20 发布日期:2016-06-29
作者简介:彭汉兵(1991-),男,硕士生,研究方向为导航卫星精密定轨。E-mail:phb_xingzhewujiang@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41020144004A;41374019;41474015);国家863计划(2013AA122501)

Performance Analysis of BDS Satellite Orbits during Eclipse Periods: Results of Satellite Laser Ranging Validation

PENG Hanbing¹, YANG Yuanxi², WANG Gang³, HE Haibo³

1. Institute of Geographical Spatial Information, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Geo-information Engineering, Xi'an 710054, China;
3. Beijing Satellite Navigation Center, Beijing 100094, China

Received:2015-12-22 Revised:2016-03-31 Online:2016-06-20 Published:2016-06-29
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.41020144004A;41374019;41474015);The National High-tech Research and Development Program of China(863 Program)(No. 2013AA122501)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 星蚀期北斗卫星的轨道性能是北斗卫星导航系统性能分析的重要部分。了解北斗卫星导航系统星历中星蚀期轨道的精度,不仅可为系统服务性能评估提供支持,还有助于了解星蚀期精密定轨中相关模型可能存在的问题,进而为精密定轨函数模型改进提供参考。本文基于2014年1月至2015年7月的卫星激光测距资料,重点分析了星蚀期对北斗不同类型卫星轨道的影响,同时也对北斗广播星历和精密星历中整体轨道径向精度进行检核。结果表明:星蚀期内(尤其是偏航机动期间),IGSO/MEO卫星的广播星历和精密星历轨道均存在明显的精度下降;广播星历轨道径向误差达1.5~2.0 m,精密星历轨道径向误差超过10.0 cm。但仅从轨道径向残差序列中难以发现星蚀期对GEO卫星轨道是否有显著影响。非星蚀期间,IGSO/MEO卫星和GEO卫星的广播星历轨道径向精度分别优于0.5 m和0.9 m。IGSO/MEO卫星的精密星历轨道径向精度优于10.0 cm,GEO卫星的轨道径向精度约50.0 cm,且存在40.0 cm左右的系统性偏差。

关键词: 北斗卫星导航系统, 星蚀期, 轨道性能, 卫星激光测距, 偏航机动

Abstract: The performance of BeiDou satellite orbits during eclipse periods is an important part of the performance analysis of BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS). Accuracy evaluation of satellite orbits in ephemeris of BDS during eclipse periods can provide support for the service performance assessment. It also helps to find possible deficiencies in the orbit modeling during eclipse periods, which may further contribute to the improvements of functional models for precise orbit determination. The effects of eclipse periods on the orbits of the three types of satellites of BDS are analyzed with the satellite laser ranging (SLR) observations ranging from January 2014 to July 2015. At the same time, the orbit radial accuracy of BDS broadcast and precise ephemeris are validated. The results show that, obvious orbit accuracy decrease can be observed in both broadcast and precise ephemeris for IGSO/MEO satellites during eclipse periods (especially the yaw-maneuver periods). And orbit radial errors of IGSO/MEO satellites in broadcast ephemeris reach 1.5~2.0 m, and exceed 10.0 cm for that in precise ephemeris. Performance decrease of the GEO satellite orbit during eclipse arcs can hardly be revealed by the orbit radial residual series. During non-eclipse periods, radial accuracy of IGSO/MEO and GEO satellite orbits in broadcast ephemeris are better than 0.5 m and 0.9 m respectively. The radial accuracy of IGSO/MEO satellite orbits in precise ephemeris are better than 10.0 cm and that of the GEO satellite is about 50.0 cm with a systematic bias of 40.0 cm around.

Key words: BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), eclipse periods, orbit performance, satellite laser ranging (SLR), yaw-maneuver

中图分类号:

P228

彭汉兵, 杨元喜, 王刚, 何海波. 星蚀期北斗卫星轨道性能分析--SLR检核结果[J]. 测绘学报, 2016, 45(6): 639-645.

PENG Hanbing, YANG Yuanxi, WANG Gang, HE Haibo. Performance Analysis of BDS Satellite Orbits during Eclipse Periods: Results of Satellite Laser Ranging Validation[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2016, 45(6): 639-645.

参考文献

[1] 杨元喜, 李金龙, 王爱兵, 等. 北斗区域卫星导航系统基本导航定位性能初步评估[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2014, 44(1):72-81. YANG Yuanxi, LI Jinlong, WANG Aibing, et al. Preliminary Assessment of the Navigation and Positioning Performance of BeiDou Regional Navigation Satellite System[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2014, 57(1):144-152.
[2] MONTENBRUCK O,STEIGENBERGER P,KHACHIKYAN R, et al. IGS-MGEX:Preparing the Ground for Multi-constellation GNSS Science[J]. Inside GNSS, 2014, 9(1):42-49.
[3] BAR-SEVER Y E. A New Model for GPS Yaw Attitude[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 1996, 70(11):714-723.
[4] DAI Xiaolei,GE Maorong,LOU Yidong,et al. Estimating the Yaw-attitude of BDS IGSO and MEO Satellites[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2015, 89(10):1005-1018.
[5] 郭靖. 姿态、光压和函数模型对导航卫星精密定轨影响的研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学, 2014. GUO Jing. The Impacts of Attitude, Solar Radiation and Function Model on Precise Orbit Determination for GNSS Satellites[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2014.
[6] GUO Jing, ZHAO Qile, GENG Tao, et al. Precise Orbit Determination for COMPASS IGSO Satellites during Yaw Maneuvers[C]//Proceedings of China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC). Berlin:Springer, 2013:41-53.
[7] MONTENBRUCK O, SCHMID R, MERCIER F, et al. GNSS Satellite Geometry and Attitude Models[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2015, 56(6):1015-1029.
[8] KOUBA J. A Simplified Yaw-attitude Model for Eclipsing GPS Satellites[J]. GPS Solutions, 2009, 13(1):1-12.
[9] DILSSNER F, SPRINGER T, GIENGER G, et al. The GLONASS-M Satellite Yaw-attitude Model[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2011, 47(1):160-171.
[10] 杨元喜, 景一帆, 曾安敏. 自适应参数估计与内外部精度的关系[J]. 测绘学报, 2014, 43(5):441-445. DOI:10.13485/j.cnki.11-2089.2014.0077. YANG Yuanxi, JING Yifan, ZENG Anmin. Adaptive Parameter Estimation and Inner and External Precision[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2014, 43(5):441-445. DOI:10.13485/j.cnki.11-2089.2014.0077.
[11] 秦显平, 杨元喜, 焦文海, 等. 利用SLR和伪距资料确定导航卫星钟差[J]. 测绘学报, 2004, 33(3):205-209. QIN Xianping, YANG Yuanxi, JIAO Wenhai, et al. Determination of Navigation Satellite Clock Bias Using SLR and Pseudorange Data[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2004, 33(3):205-209.
[12] 秦显平, 杨元喜, 王刚, 等. SLR资料精密测定GLONASS卫星轨道[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2003, 28(4):440-443. QIN Xianping, YANG Yuanxi, WANG Gang, et al. GLONASS Orbit Determination by Using SLR Data[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2003, 28(4):440-443.
[13] PAVLIS E C, BEARD R L. The Laser Retroreflector Experiment on GPS-35 and 36[M]//BEUTLER G, MELBOURNEW G, HEING W, et al. GPS Trends in Precise Terrestrial, Airborne, and Spaceborne Applications. Berlin:Springer, 1996:154-158.
[14] APPLEBY G, OTSUBO T. Comparison of SLR Measurements and Orbits with GLONASS and GPS Microwave Orbits[C]//Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Laser Ranging.Matera:NASA, 2000:13-17.
[15] SOS'NICA K, THALLER D, DACH R, et al. Satellite Laser Ranging to GPS and GLONASS[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2015, 89(7):725-743.
[16] URSCHL C, GURTNER W, HUGENTOBLER U, et al. Validation of GNSS Orbits Using SLR Observations[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2005, 36(3):412-417.
[17] MONTENBRUCK O,STEIGENBERGER P,KIRCHNER G. GNSS Satellite Orbit Validation Using Satellite Laser Ranging[C]//Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Laser Ranging.Fujiyoshida:NASA,2013.
[18] MONTENBRUCK O, STEIGENBERGER P. The BeiDou Navigation Message[J]. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 2013, 12(1):1-12.
[19] MONTENBRUCK O,STEIGENBERGER P,HAUSCHILD A. Broadcast versus Precise Ephemerides:A Multi-GNSS Perspective[J]. GPS Solutions, 2015, 19(2):321-333.
[20] STEIGENBERGER P, HUGENTOBLER U, HAUSCHILD A, et al. Orbit and Clock Analysis of Compass GEO and IGSO Satellites[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2013, 87(6):515-525.
[21] LOU Yidong, LIU Yang,SHI Chuang, et al. Precise Orbit Determination of BeiDou Constellation Based on BETS and MGEX Network[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4:4692.
[22] ZHAO Qile, GUO Jing, LI Min, et al. Initial Results of Precise Orbit and Clock Determination for COMPASS Navigation Satellite System[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2013, 87(5):475-486.
[23] LOU Yidong, LIU Yang, SHI Chuang, et al. Precise Orbit Determination of BeiDou Constellation:Method Comparison[J]. GPS Solutions, 2016, 20(2):259-268.
[24] PEARLMAN M R, DEGNAN J J, BOSWORTH J M. The International Laser Ranging Service[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2002, 30(2):135-143.
[25] DENG Zhiguo, GE Maorong, UHLEMANN M, et al. Precise Orbit Determination of BeiDou Satellites at GFZ[C]//EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Vienna:EGU, 2014.

星蚀期北斗卫星轨道性能分析--SLR检核结果

Performance Analysis of BDS Satellite Orbits during Eclipse Periods: Results of Satellite Laser Ranging Validation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈俊平, 张益泽, 于超, 丁君生. 北斗卫星导航系统精密定位报告算法与性能评估[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(4): 511-521.
[2]	唐成盼, 宿晨庚, 胡小工, 高为广, 刘利, 卢鋆, 陈颖, 刘成, 王威, 周善石. 北斗卫星伪距偏差标定及对用户定位精度影响[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(9): 1131-1138.
[3]	苏珂, 金双根. BDS/Galileo四频精密单点定位模型性能分析与比较[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(9): 1189-1201.
[4]	李毓照, 闫浩文, 王世杰, 杨维芳. BDS三频信号最优组合的模糊聚类分析法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(8): 974-982.
[5]	刘经南, 郭文飞, 郭迟, 高柯夫, 崔竞松. 智能时代泛在测绘的再思考[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(4): 403-414.
[6]	魏子卿, 吴富梅, 刘光明. 北斗坐标系[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(7): 805-809.
[7]	陈俊平, 王阿昊, 张益泽, 周建华, 王兵浩, 王解先. 北斗广域差分分米级定位的分区切换算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(7): 822-830.
[8]	邵璠, 王小亚, 何冰, 张晶. 模糊聚类定权法对SLR定轨精度的影响[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(10): 1236-1243.
[9]	陈金平, 曹月玲, 郭睿, 李晓杰, 孟鑫. 北斗试验卫星空间信号精度参数SISA计算方法及性能验证[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(S0): 1-8.
[10]	郭睿, 周建华, 胡小工, 李晓杰, 刘利, 周善石, 吴杉. 北斗IGSO卫星姿态零偏航状态下精密定轨[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(S0): 18-27.
[11]	孔垚, 张小贞, 孙保琪, 刘枫. SLR数据对北斗卫星精密定轨的作用分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(S0): 86-92.
[12]	常志巧, 胡小工, 陈刘成, 李晓杰, 祖安然, 唐成盼, 黄华. 北斗高精度长弧历书模型设计[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(3): 298-307.
[13]	房亚男, 辛景民, 曾光, 王家松, 李杰. 模糊度固定的北斗卫星多系统融合精密轨道确定[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(3): 341-347.
[14]	王阅兵, 甘卫军, 陈为涛, 连尉平, 游新兆. 北斗导航系统精密单点定位在地壳运动监测中的应用分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(1): 48-56.
[15]	曾添, 隋立芬, 贾小林, 计国锋, 张清华. 风云3C增强北斗定轨试验结果与分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(7): 824-833.