BDS/Galileo四频精密单点定位模型性能分析与比较

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20200236

测绘学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (9): 1189-1201.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20200236

BDS/Galileo四频精密单点定位模型性能分析与比较

苏珂^1,2, 金双根^1,3

1. 中国科学院上海天文台, 上海 200030;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 南京信息工程大学遥感与测绘工程学院, 江苏南京 210044

收稿日期:2020-06-12 修回日期:2020-08-21 发布日期:2020-09-19
通讯作者: 金双根 E-mail:sgjin@shao.ac.cn
作者简介:苏珂(1994-),男,博士生,研究方向为GNSS导航定位与应用。E-mail:ksu@shao.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（NSFC-DFG）合作项目（41761134092）

Analysis and comparisons of the BDS/Galileo quad-frequency PPP models performances

SU Ke^1,2, JIN Shuanggen^1,3

1. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. School of Remote Sensing and Geomatics Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

Received:2020-06-12 Revised:2020-08-21 Published:2020-09-19
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-DFG) Project (No. 41761134092)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 北斗卫星导航系统和Galileo卫星系统都可以提供4个频率信号上的服务。本文通过与双频无电离层模型（DF）比较，评估分析了4种BDS/Galileo四频PPP模型性能，即四频无电离层双组合模型（QF1）、四频无电离层组合模型（QF2）、四频非差非组合模型（QF3）和附加电离层约束四频非差非组合模型（QF4），同时通过等价性原则理论上证明了QF1、QF2、QF3模型的等价性。此外，用1个月参考站的静态数据和1组动态数据分析了四频静态，仿动态和动态PPP性能。试验结果表明，BDS-3 B1C和B2a新频点伪距噪声要略大于B1I和B3I信号，Galileo卫星4个频率上的伪距噪声相差并不明显。对于静态和仿动态PPP模型，QF1、QF2和QF3模型定位性能基本上一致。通过附加外部电离层约束，四频PPP模型性能受到影响，BDS（BDS-2+BDS-3）静态QF4模型相比于QF1、QF2和QF3模型平均收敛时间分别减少了4.4%、4.4%和5.4%，Galileo静态Q4模型平均收敛时间相比于Q3模型增加了16.8 min。对于动态PPP，四频PPP模型相比于双频PPP性能得到提升显著，相比于QF1模型，BDS和Galileo单系统QF4模型三维定位精度分别提高了11.4%和31.4%。BDS/Galileo双系统PPP性能要优于单系统PPP。

关键词: 北斗卫星导航系统, Galileo, 精密单点定位, 等价性原则, 四频

Abstract: Chinese BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) and Galileo system can provide the services of quad-frequency observations. In this paper, we assess the BDS/Galileo quad-frequency precise point positioning (PPP) models, i.e., PPP model with two ionosphere-free combinations (QF1), PPP model with one ionosphere-free combination (QF2), undifferenced uncombined PPP model (QF3) and ionosphere-constrained undifferenced uncombined PPP model (QF4), by comparing the dual-frequency ionosphere-free PPP model (DF). The equivalence of the QF1, QF2 and QF3 models is theoretically demonstrated by the equivalence principle. The static and simulated kinematic PPP performances are evaluated and investigated with one-month period observations from the network stations and the kinematic PPP performances are verified with a kinematic experiment in the campus. The results show that the pseudorange noises of BDS-3 B1C and B2a signals are larger than the B1I and B3I signals and the pseudorange noises differences for the Galileo quad-frequency signals are not obvious. The performances of the QF1, QF2 and QF3 models are basically consistent for the static and simulated kinematic PPP. By adding the external ionospheric constraint, the quad-frequency PPP performances are affected. Compared to the QF1, QF2 and QF3 models, the mean convergence time of the static BDS (BDS-2+BDS-3) model are reduced by 4.4%, 4.4% and 5.4%, respectively. The mean convergence time of static Q4 model increases 16.8 minutes when compared to the QF3 model. Compared to the dual-frequency PPP, the quad-frequency kinematic PPP performances are obviously improved. The three-dimensional positioning accuracy of BDS and Galileo QF4 models are improved by 11.4% and 31.4%, respectively, when compared to the QF1 models. Furthermore, the BDS/Galileo kinematic PPP models perform better than the single-system solutions.

Key words: BDS, Galileo, precise point positioning, equivalence validation, quad-frequency

中图分类号:

P228

苏珂, 金双根. BDS/Galileo四频精密单点定位模型性能分析与比较[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(9): 1189-1201.

SU Ke, JIN Shuanggen. Analysis and comparisons of the BDS/Galileo quad-frequency PPP models performances[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2020, 49(9): 1189-1201.

参考文献

[1] JIN Shuanggen, SU Ke. Co-seismic displacement and waveforms of the 2018 Alaska earthquake from high-rate GPS PPP velocity estimation[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2019, 93(9):1559-1569.
[2] ZAVOROTNY V U, GLEASON S, CARDELLACH E, et al. Tutorial on remote sensing using GNSS bistatic radar of opportunity[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2014, 2(4):8-45.
[3] PÍRIZ R, GARCÍA Á M, TOBÍAS G, et al. GNSS interoperability:offset between reference time scales and timing biases[J]. Metrologia, 2008, 45(6):S87.
[4] LI X X, LI X, YUAN Y, et al. Multi-GNSS phase delay estimation and PPP ambiguity resolution:GPS, BDS, GLONASS, Galileo[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2018,92(6):579-608.
[5] YANG Y, MAO Y, SUN B. Basic performance and future developments of BeiDou global navigation satellite system[J]. Satellite Navigation, 2020, 1(1):1-8.
[6] 陈秋丽, 杨慧, 陈忠贵, 等. 北斗卫星太阳光压解析模型建立及应用[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(2):169-175. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2019.20180097. CHEN Qiuli, YANG Hui, CHEN Zhonggui, et al. Solar radiation pressure modeling and application of BDS satellite[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2019, 48(2):169-175. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2019.20180097.
[7] DIESSONGO T H, SCHVLER T, JUNKER S. Precise position determination using a Galileo E5 single-frequency receiver[J]. GPS Solutions, 2014, 18(1):73-83.
[8] ZUMBERGE J F, HEFLIN M B, JEFFERSON D C, et al. Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 1997, 102(B3):5005-5017.
[9] GUO Fei, ZHANG Xiaohong, WANG Jinling, et al. Modeling and assessment of triple-frequency BDS precise point positioning[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2016, 90(11):1223-1235.
[10] LOU Yidong, ZHENG Fu, GU Shengfeng, et al. Multi-GNSS precise point positioning with raw single-frequency and dual-frequency measurement models[J]. GPS Solutions, 2016, 20(4):849-862.
[11] ZHANG Zhiteng, LI Bofeng, NIE Liangwei, et al. Initial assessment of BeiDou-3 global navigation satellite system:signal quality, RTK and PPP[J]. GPS Solutions, 2019, 23(4):111.
[12] JIAO Guoqiang, SONG Shuli, GE Yulong, et al. Assessment of BeiDou-3 and multi-GNSS precise point positioning performance[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(11):2496.
[13] JIN Shuanggen, SU Ke. PPP models and performances from single- to quad-frequency BDS observations[J]. Satellite Navigation, 2020, 1(1):16.
[14] ZHANG Pengfei, TU Rui, GAO Yuping, et al. Performance of Galileo precise time and frequency transfer models using quad-frequency carrier phase observations[J]. GPS Solutions, 2020, 24(2):40.
[15] LEICK A, RAPOPORT L, TATARNIKOV D. GPS satellite surveying[M]. 4th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
[16] CLOSAS P, FERNÁNDEZ-PRADES C, FERNÁNDEZ-RUBIO J A. Maximum likelihood estimation of position in GNSS[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2007, 14(5):359-362.
[17] 李博峰, 葛海波, 沈云中. 无电离层组合、Uofc和非组合精密单点定位观测模型比较[J]. 测绘学报, 2015, 44(7):734-740. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20140161. LI Bofeng, GE Haibo, SHEN Yunzhong. Comparison of ionosphere-free, Uofc and uncombined PPP observation models[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2015, 44(7):734-740. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2015.20140161.
[18] XU Guochang, XU Yan. GPS:theory, algorithms and applications[M]. 3rd ed. Berlin:Springer, 2016.
[19] SU Ke, JIN Shuanggen, GE Yulong. Rapid displacement determination with a stand-alone multi-GNSS receiver:GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS, and Galileo[J]. GPS Solutions, 2019, 23(2):54.
[20] SU Ke, JIN Shuanggen. Triple-frequency carrier phase precise time and frequency transfer models for BDS-3[J]. GPS Solutions, 2019, 23(3):86.
[21] SU Ke, JIN Shuanggen, HOQUE M M. Evaluation of ionospheric delay effects on multi-GNSS positioning performance[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(2):171.
[22] WANG Chen, ZHAO Qile, GUO Jing, et al. The contribution of intersatellite links to BDS-3 orbit determination:Model refinement and comparisons[J]. Navigation, 2019, 66(1):71-82.
[23] LI Z, WANG N, WANG L, et al. Regional ionospheric TEC modeling based on a two-layer spherical harmonic approximation for real-time single-frequency PPP[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2019, 93(9):1659-1671.
[24] LIU T, YUAN Y, ZHANG B, et al. Multi-GNSS precise point positioning (MGPPP) using raw observations[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2017, 91(3):253-268.
[25] WU J T, WU S C, HAJJ G A, et al. Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase[C]//Proceedings of Astrodynamics 1991 the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Conference. San Diego, CA:Univelt, Inc., 1992:1647-1660.
[26] SU Ke, JIN Shuanggen. Improvement of multi-GNSS precise point positioning performances with real meteorological data[J]. The Journal of Navigation, 2018, 71(6):1363-1380.
[27] LANDSKRON D, BÖHM J. VMF3/GPT3:refined discrete and empirical troposphere mapping functions[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2018, 92(4):349-360.
[28] FAN Haopeng, SUN Zhongmiao, ZHANG Liping, et al. A two-step estimation method of troposphere delay with consideration of mapping function errors[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2020, 3(1):76-84. DOI:10.11947/j.JGGS.2020.0108.
[29] HAUSCHILD A, MONTENBRUCK O, SLEEWAEGEN J M, et al. Characterization of compass M-1 signals[J]. GPS Solutions, 2012, 16(1):117-126.

BDS/Galileo四频精密单点定位模型性能分析与比较

Analysis and comparisons of the BDS/Galileo quad-frequency PPP models performances

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	施闯, 辜声峰, 楼益栋, 郑福, 宋伟, 张东, 毛飞宇. 广域实时精密定位与时间服务系统[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1206-1214.
[2]	金双根, 汪奇生, 史奇奇. 单频到五频多系统GNSS精密单点定位参数估计与应用[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1239-1248.
[3]	杨凯淳, 吕志平, 李林阳, 邝英才, 许炜, 郑茜. 附加历元间约束的滑动窗单频实时精密单点定位算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(5): 648-657.
[4]	李博峰, 秦园阳, 陈广鄂. 基于无几何电离层滤波模型的北斗三号系统相位周跳与中断修复方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(4): 501-510.
[5]	陈俊平, 张益泽, 于超, 丁君生. 北斗卫星导航系统精密定位报告算法与性能评估[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(4): 511-521.
[6]	蔡洪亮, 孟轶男, 耿长江, 高为广, 张天桥, 李罡, 邵搏, 辛洁, 卢红洋, 毛悦, 袁海波, 刘成, 胡小工, 楼益栋. 北斗三号全球导航卫星系统服务性能评估:定位导航授时、星基增强、精密单点定位、短报文通信与国际搜救[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(4): 427-435.
[7]	房亚男, 朱俊, 李杰, 王冲, 王家松, 张少愚. 北斗混合星座分层约束下的精密定轨方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(4): 466-474.
[8]	张兵兵, 牛继强, 王正涛, 徐丰, 田坤俊. Swarm系列卫星非差运动学厘米级精密定轨[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(1): 27-36.
[9]	周锋, 徐天河. GPS/BDS/Galileo三频精密单点定位模型及性能分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(1): 61-70.
[10]	张小红, 胡家欢, 任晓东. PPP/PPP-RTK新进展与北斗/GNSS PPP定位性能比较[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(9): 1084-1100.
[11]	李星星, 黄健德, 袁勇强, 李婕, 刘城伯, 朱艺婷. Galileo三频非组合精密定轨模型及精度评估[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(9): 1120-1130.
[12]	唐成盼, 宿晨庚, 胡小工, 高为广, 刘利, 卢鋆, 陈颖, 刘成, 王威, 周善石. 北斗卫星伪距偏差标定及对用户定位精度影响[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(9): 1131-1138.
[13]	李毓照, 闫浩文, 王世杰, 杨维芳. BDS三频信号最优组合的模糊聚类分析法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(8): 974-982.
[14]	杜祯强, 柴洪洲, 向民志, 尹潇, 刘春鹤. 3种PPP模型的统一模糊度固定方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(7): 824-832.
[15]	刘经南, 郭文飞, 郭迟, 高柯夫, 崔竞松. 智能时代泛在测绘的再思考[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(4): 403-414.