Wi-Fi RTT/RSS fusion localization CRLB derivation and optimal access points layout design

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2024.20230220.

Abstract

Abstract:

The fine time measurement (FTM) protocol-based Wi-Fi RTT positioning is currently a research spotlight in the community. However, the performance evaluation methods of localization algorithms are relatively simplistic and lack theoretical basis. Furthermore, the impact of Wi-Fi access points (AP) layout on positioning accuracy has not been thoroughly studied. This paper focuses on smartphone-based Wi-Fi FTM as the research object. It derives the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) of the Wi-Fi RTT/RSS hybrid positioning method and clarifies the theoretical CRLB relationships of the single and hybrid positioning methods, which establishes a theoretical foundation for algorithm performance evaluation. The influence of Wi-Fi AP deployments on the localization accuracy of the RTT/RSS fusion positioning is studied, and an optimal access point layout approach for Wi-Fi RTT/RSS hybrid positioning is designed based on the enhanced genetic algorithm (EGA) and CRLB. Research shows that Wi-Fi RSS/RTT fusion localization is also an efficient FTM positioning method. The proposed EGA and CRLB-based optimal layout approach for Wi-Fi APs can quickly produce the optimal access point deployment strategy for the positioning area. The experimental results reveal that under the optimal layout of 7 Wi-Fi APs, the theoretical accuracy of Wi-Fi RSS, RTT, and RSS/RTT fusion positioning in the testing site of this manuscript is 0.92, 1.07 and 0.61 m, respectively. The research work provides theoretical support for evaluating the performance of Wi-Fi FTM positioning and offers practical strategies for deploying Wi-Fi APs effectively, thereby reducing positioning investment.

Key words: indoor positioning and navigation, Wi-Fi fine time measurement, smartphone-based positioning, Wi-Fi AP layout, Cramer-Rao lower bound, enhanced genetic algorithm

CLC Number:

P228

Meng SUN, Yunjia WANG, Qianxin WANG, Guoliang CHEN, Zengke LI. Wi-Fi RTT/RSS fusion localization CRLB derivation and optimal access points layout design[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2024, 53(10): 1993-2006.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: http://xb.chinasmp.com/EN/10.11947/j.AGCS.2024.20230220.

http://xb.chinasmp.com/EN/Y2024/V53/I10/1993

Figures/Tables 13

Tab.1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.2

Fig.6

Tab.3

Tab.4

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

References 29

[1]	YANG Yuanxi. Resilient PNT concept frame[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2019, 2(3):1-7.
[2]	陈锐志, 陈亮. 基于智能手机的室内定位技术的发展现状和挑战[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(10):1316-1326. DOI:. doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20170383
	CHEN Ruizhi, CHEN Liang. Indoor positioning with smartphones: the state-of-the-art and the challenges[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2017, 46(10):1316-1326. DOI:. doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20170383
[3]	陈锐志, 郭光毅, 叶锋, 等. 智能手机音频信号与MEMS传感器的紧耦合室内定位方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(2):143-152. DOI:. doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20200551
	CHEN Ruizhi, GUO Guangyi, YE Feng, et al. Tightly-coupled integration of acoustic signal and MEMS sensors on smartphones for indoor positioning[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2021, 50(2):143-152. DOI:. doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20200551
[4]	IEEE Standard Association. IEEE standard for information technology—telecommunications and information exchange between systems local and metropolitan area networks-specific requirements—Part 11: wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications[S]. [S.l.]: IEEE, 2016.
[5]	ANDROID Developers. Wi-Fi location: ranging with RTT[EB/OL]. [2024-02-08]. https://developer.android.com/develop/connectivity/wifi/wifi-rtt.
[6]	BANIN L, SCHATZBERG U, AMIZUR Y. WiFi FTM and map information fusion for accurate positioning[C]//Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation. Alcalá de Henares: IEEE, 2016.
[7]	BANIN L, BAR-SHALOM O, DVORECKI N, et al. Scalable Wi-Fi client self-positioning using cooperative FTM-sensors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2019, 68(10):3686-3698.
[8]	DVORECKI N, BAR-SHALOM O, BANIN L, et al. A machine learning approach for Wi-Fi RTT ranging[C]//Proceedings of 2019 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation. Reston: Institute of Navigation, 2019.
[9]	IBRAHIM M, LIU Hansi, JAWAHAR M, et al. Verification: accuracy evaluation of WiFi fine time measurements on an open platform[C]//Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. New Delhi: ACM Press, 2018.
[10]	IBRAHIM M, ROSTAMI A, YU Bo, et al. Wi-Go: accurate and scalable vehicle positioning using WiFi fine timing measurement[C]//Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. Toronto: ACM Press, 2020.
[11]	JIOKENG K, JAKLLARI G, TCHANA A, et al. When FTM discovered MUSIC: accurate WiFi-based ranging in the presence of multipath[C]//Proceedings of 2020 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. Toronto: IEEE, 2020: 1857-1866.
[12]	CHAN Haowei, LAI A I C, WU R B. Transfer learning of Wi-Fi FTM responder positioning with NLOS identification[C]//Proceedings of 2021 IEEE Topical Conference on Wireless Sensors and Sensor Networks. San Diego: IEEE, 2021: 23-26.
[13]	DONG Yinhuan, ARSLAN T, YANG Yunjie. Real-time NLOS/LOS identification for smartphone-based indoor positioning systems using WiFi RTT and RSS[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2022, 22(6):5199-5209.
[14]	YU Yue, CHEN Ruizhi, CHEN Liang, et al. A robust dead reckoning algorithm based on Wi-Fi FTM and multiple sensors[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(5):504.
[15]	GUO Guangyi, CHEN Ruizhi, YE Feng, et al. Indoor smartphone localization: a hybrid WiFi RTT-RSS ranging approach[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7:176767-176781.
[16]	GUO Guangyi, CHEN Ruizhi, YE Feng, et al. Arobust integration platform of Wi-Fi RTT, RSS signal, and MEMS-IMU for locating commercial smartphone indoors[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2022, 9(17):16322-16331.
[17]	YU Yue, CHEN Ruizhi, CHEN Liang, et al. Precise 3D indoor localization based on Wi-Fi FTM and built-in sensors[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2020, 7(12):11753-11765.
[18]	GUO Guangyi, CHEN Ruizhi, NIU Xiaoguang, et al. Factor graph framework for smartphone indoor localization: integrating data-driven PDR and Wi-Fi RTT/RSS ranging[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2023, 23(11):12346-12354.
[19]	SHAO Wenhua, LUO Haiyong, ZHAO Fang, et al. Accurate indoor positioning using temporal-spatial constraints based on Wi-Fi fine time measurements[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2020, 7(11):11006-11019.
[20]	阎硕. 基于Wi-Fi精细时间测量的测距定位算法研究[D]. 北京: 北京邮电大学, 2020.
	YAN Shuo. The research of Wi-Fi fine time measurement based indoor positioning[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2020.
[21]	邵文华. 室内移动位置感知关键技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京邮电大学, 2019.
	SHAO Wenhua. Research on key technologies of indoor mobile location awareness[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2019.
[22]	SI Minghao, WANG Yunjia, XU Shenglei, et al. A Wi-Fi FTM-based indoor positioning method with LOS/NLOS identification[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(3):956.
[23]	CAO Hongji, WANG Yunjia, BI Jingxue, et al. Indoor positioning method using WiFi RTT based on LOS identification and range calibration[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2020, 9(11):627.
[24]	SUN Meng, WANG Yunjia, XU Shenglei, et al. Indoor positioning tightly coupled Wi-Fi FTM ranging and PDR based on the extended Kalman filter for smartphones[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8:49671-49684.
[25]	ZHOU Baoding, WU Zhiqian, CHEN Zhipeng, et al. Wi-Fi RTT/encoder/INS-based robot indoor localization using smartphones[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2023, 72(5):6683-6694.
[26]	HUANG Lu, YU Baoguo, LI Hongsheng, et al. HPIPS: a high-precision indoor pedestrian positioning system fusing WiFi-RTT, MEMS, and map information[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(23):6795.
[27]	KAY S M. Fundamentals of statistical signal processing[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall PTR, 1993.
[28]	PLETS D, JOSEPH W, VANHECKE K, et al. Coverage prediction and optimization algorithms for indoor environments[J]. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2012, 2012(1):123.
[29]	SUN Meng, WANG Yunjia, XU Shenglei, et al. Indoor geomagnetic positioning using the enhanced genetic algorithm-based extreme learning machine[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2021, 70:1-11.

定位方法	NLoS/LoS识别	测距补偿	测试场景	定位精度
Wi-Fi FTM+地图^[6-7]	否	无	试验室办公环境(>1000 m²)	<2 m (90%)
Wi-Fi FTM+GPS+里程计^[10]	否	有/多径补偿	市区街道/住宅区/郊区环境	1.3 m/2.1 m/0.8 m
Wi-Fi FTM+RSS测距^[15]	否	有/钟差补偿	室内房间(16.7 m×12.14 m)	1.44 m
Wi-Fi FTM+RSS测距+PDR^[16]	否	有/RSS测距	建筑楼/办公室	0.58 m(50%)
Wi-Fi RSS测距+FTM+PDR^[17]	否	有/RSS测距	2层试验室环境(33 m×9 m)	<1.1 m(67.5%)
Wi-Fi RSS测距+FTM+PDR^[18]	无	有/RSS测距	室内办公环境(约126 m²)	0.39 m
时空约束的Wi-Fi FTM定位^[19]	无	无	办公室环境	<1 m (80%)
基于高斯模型的Wi-Fi FTM定位^[22]	是	无	试验室办公环境(20 m×8 m)	<1 m
基于高斯过程回归的Wi-Fi FTM定位^[23]	是	有/NLOS误差补偿	试验室办公环境(20 m×8 m)	<1 m
Wi-Fi FTM+PDR^[24]	是	有/测距误差补偿	试验室办公环境(20 m×8 m)	0.98 m
Wi-Fi FTM+Encoder+INS^[25]	否	无	LoS/NLoS环境	0.54 m/0.77 m
Wi-Fi FTM+地图+MEMS^[26]	是	无	2层试验室环境	<1 m (94%)

定位方法	最小值	最大值	平均值	75 th	90 th
RSS	0.16	3.42	1.16	1.56	2.06
RTT	0.47	3.08	1.35	1.76	2.11
RSS/RTT	0.10	2.12	0.74	0.93	1.20

AP数量	统计量	RSS/m	RTT/m	RSS/RTT/m
3	均值	2.05	2.32	1.20
	75 th	2.52	2.87	1.37
	90 th	3.61	3.78	2.03
4	均值	1.88	2.13	1.09
	75 th	2.42	2.80	1.25
	90 th	3.51	3.71	1.94
5	均值	1.78	1.97	1.00
	75 th	2.35	2.62	1.19
	90 th	3.46	3.55	1.78

定位方法	最小值	最大值	平均值	75 th	90 th
RSS	0.41	1.72	0.92	1.05	1.18
RTT	0.75	1.89	1.07	1.13	1.35
RSS/RTT	0.17	1.23	0.61	0.68	0.77