
测绘学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (9): 1612-1629.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2026.20260129
收稿日期:2026-04-07
修回日期:2026-09-16
出版日期:2026-10-28
发布日期:2026-10-28
作者简介:贾淑涵(1995—),女,博士,讲师,研究方向为遥感影像信息识别与提取。 E-mail:jiashlzh@163.com
基金资助:
Shuhan Jia(
), Yuxiang Feng, Quanhua Zhao, Yu Li
Received:2026-04-07
Revised:2026-09-16
Online:2026-10-28
Published:2026-10-28
About author:Jia Shuhan (1995—), female, PhD, lecturer, majors in remote sensing image information recognition and extraction. E-mail: jiashlzh@163.com
Supported by:摘要:
耕地作为粮食安全的核心保障,其精准提取对优化土地资源配置、农业可持续发展具有重要意义。对象上下文网络(OCNet)虽具备一定的影像上下文信息捕捉能力,但该网络面对山地丘陵地区耕地零散破碎、尺度差异大和空间分布不均等特征仍存在提取能力薄弱以及语义聚合局限于单尺度的问题。针对上述问题,本文提出了多尺度特征增强的OCNet(MSFE-OCNet)算法。为了增强模型对不同尺度耕地的识别能力,该算法将局部细节的空洞空间金字塔池化模块(ASPP)和全局语义的多分支OC模块组建为MSFE模块,其中ASPP模块采用(12,24,36)空洞率组合,多分支OC模块采用(1,2,4)感受野组合。在训练阶段引入加权交叉熵-Dice联合损失函数,解决小样本类别训练不充分的问题。为验证算法性能,本文以南昌市、景德镇市和鹰潭市为研究区进行耕地提取并设计一系列对比试验与消融试验。在南昌市、景德镇市和鹰潭市3个典型山地丘陵研究区中,MSFE-OCNet算法的各项精度指标均优于U-Net、GTNet、SAM和DeepLabV3+等对比算法。MSFE-OCNet算法的OA、Kappa系数和MCA在南昌市分别为92.87%、90.50%和91.33%,在景德镇市分别为93.69%、91.56%和92.15%,在鹰潭市分别为93.71%、91.59%和92.22%。针对耕地类别,MSFE-OCNet算法耕地的IoU和F1值在南昌市分别为90.03%和94.76%,在景德镇市分别为92.73%和96.23%,在鹰潭市分别为92.05%和95.86%。试验结果表明,MSFE-OCNet算法有效提升了山地丘陵地区细碎耕地的识别完整性与分类准确性。
中图分类号:
贾淑涵, 冯宇翔, 赵泉华, 李玉. 基于MSFE-OCNet算法的山地丘陵地区耕地提取[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(9): 1612-1629.
Shuhan Jia, Yuxiang Feng, Quanhua Zhao, Yu Li. Cultivated land extraction in mountainous and hilly areas based on MSFE-OCNet algorithm[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2026, 55(9): 1612-1629.
表2
对比试验结果精度评价"
| 研究区 | 算法 | OA | Kappa | MCA | 耕地IoU | 耕地F1值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 南昌市 | MSFE-OCNet | 92.87 | 90.50 | 91.33 | 90.03 | 94.76 |
| U-Net | 91.32 | 88.46 | 89.98 | 86.92 | 93.00 | |
| GTNet | 89.27 | 85.71 | 86.86 | 87.72 | 93.46 | |
| SAM | 89.10 | 85.48 | 87.22 | 84.44 | 91.56 | |
| DeepLabV3+ | 88.29 | 84.38 | 86.17 | 82.88 | 90.64 | |
| 景德镇市 | MSFE-OCNet | 93.69 | 91.56 | 92.15 | 92.73 | 96.23 |
| U-Net | 91.81 | 89.05 | 90.27 | 88.78 | 94.05 | |
| GTNet | 89.60 | 86.10 | 87.30 | 87.93 | 93.58 | |
| SAM | 89.56 | 86.01 | 87.44 | 86.18 | 92.58 | |
| DeepLabV3+ | 88.64 | 84.80 | 86.82 | 83.08 | 90.76 | |
| 鹰潭市 | MSFE-OCNet | 93.71 | 91.59 | 92.22 | 92.05 | 95.86 |
| U-Net | 91.64 | 88.84 | 90.55 | 87.14 | 93.13 | |
| GTNet | 90.08 | 86.75 | 87.78 | 88.89 | 94.12 | |
| SAM | 89.71 | 86.24 | 87.68 | 85.88 | 92.40 | |
| DeepLabV3+ | 88.95 | 85.21 | 86.92 | 84.02 | 91.32 |
表3
南昌市对比试验各算法不同类别PA和UA明细"
| 类别 | MSFE-OCNet | U-Net | GTNet | SAM | DeepLabV3+ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA | UA | PA | UA | PA | UA | PA | UA | PA | UA | |
| 耕地 | 95.41 | 94.11 | 93.05 | 92.95 | 94.00 | 92.92 | 92.35 | 90.79 | 91.64 | 89.66 |
| 果园 | 86.96 | 88.26 | 85.64 | 86.83 | 81.76 | 81.67 | 82.50 | 84.28 | 81.23 | 82.53 |
| 林地 | 92.67 | 92.85 | 91.94 | 90.89 | 87.37 | 87.90 | 88.20 | 88.83 | 87.92 | 87.86 |
| 建筑 | 90.38 | 91.82 | 89.45 | 89.06 | 84.63 | 84.71 | 84.83 | 85.23 | 83.45 | 85.83 |
| 道路 | 88.39 | 88.93 | 86.82 | 86.79 | 82.39 | 82.76 | 83.20 | 84.10 | 81.51 | 83.35 |
| 水体 | 94.17 | 95.49 | 92.99 | 94.83 | 91.01 | 93.39 | 92.22 | 93.70 | 91.26 | 94.03 |
表4
景德镇市对比试验各算法不同类别PA和UA明细"
| 类别 | MSFE-OCNet | U-Net | GTNet | SAM | DeepLabV3+ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA | UA | PA | UA | PA | UA | PA | UA | PA | UA | |
| 耕地 | 96.74 | 95.72 | 94.38 | 93.73 | 94.07 | 93.09 | 93.79 | 91.40 | 91.68 | 89.86 |
| 果园 | 87.99 | 88.60 | 85.57 | 87.15 | 82.20 | 82.66 | 82.57 | 84.44 | 82.16 | 83.59 |
| 林地 | 92.78 | 93.16 | 91.84 | 91.14 | 88.28 | 88.30 | 88.06 | 89.73 | 88.29 | 89.12 |
| 建筑 | 91.44 | 91.55 | 89.38 | 89.49 | 84.69 | 85.22 | 84.85 | 85.98 | 84.80 | 86.34 |
| 道路 | 89.41 | 89.68 | 87.37 | 87.40 | 82.80 | 83.56 | 83.10 | 84.80 | 82.08 | 83.24 |
| 水体 | 94.54 | 96.76 | 93.10 | 95.67 | 91.76 | 94.10 | 92.28 | 93.22 | 91.92 | 93.21 |
表5
鹰潭市对比试验各算法不同类别PA和UA明细"
| 类别 | MSFE-OCNet | U-Net | GTNet | SAM | DeepLabV3+ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA | UA | PA | UA | PA | UA | PA | UA | PA | UA | |
| 耕地 | 96.69 | 95.05 | 93.62 | 92.64 | 94.87 | 93.38 | 93.44 | 91.39 | 92.44 | 90.22 |
| 果园 | 88.49 | 89.61 | 86.95 | 87.05 | 83.00 | 83.17 | 83.07 | 84.63 | 82.08 | 84.18 |
| 林地 | 92.75 | 93.28 | 91.22 | 91.79 | 88.14 | 89.12 | 89.09 | 90.18 | 88.44 | 88.90 |
| 建筑 | 90.97 | 92.35 | 89.99 | 90.00 | 84.80 | 85.56 | 84.40 | 85.87 | 84.41 | 86.91 |
| 道路 | 89.59 | 90.06 | 88.04 | 88.14 | 83.35 | 84.15 | 83.96 | 84.95 | 82.15 | 83.31 |
| 水体 | 94.85 | 97.08 | 93.49 | 95.86 | 92.50 | 94.32 | 92.10 | 93.52 | 92.01 | 93.97 |
表8
不同OC分支数量、尺度配比与主流注意力机制消融精度对比"
| 算法/注意力模块设置 | OA | Kappa系数 | MCA | 耕地IoU | 耕地F1值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OC(1) | 82.24 | 81.75 | 78.36 | 77.18 | 87.12 |
| OC(1,2) | 83.43 | 83.21 | 79.54 | 78.25 | 87.80 |
| OC(1,2,3) | 89.05 | 88.14 | 83.72 | 82.43 | 90.37 |
| OC(1,2,4) | 92.87 | 90.50 | 91.33 | 90.03 | 94.76 |
| OC(1,2,5) | 91.06 | 89.73 | 85.21 | 83.86 | 91.22 |
| OC(1,2,4,8) | 84.21 | 83.54 | 79.86 | 78.52 | 87.97 |
| OC(2,4,8) | 86.47 | 85.62 | 81.47 | 80.15 | 88.98 |
| CBAM注意力 | 81.14 | 80.62 | 77.24 | 76.04 | 86.39 |
| SE注意力 | 82.12 | 81.63 | 78.15 | 77.03 | 87.02 |
| [1] | Wang Mengyu, Yan Zhiyuan, Feng Yingchao, et al. Multi-task learning of semantic segmentation and height estimation for multi-modal remote sensing images[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2023, 6(4): 27-39. |
| [2] |
吴田军, 李曼嘉, 骆剑承, 等. 耦合空间分布模式的复杂山区地块作物遥感分类方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2025, 54(7): 1215-1229. DOI: .
doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2025.20240440 |
|
Wu Tianjun, Li Manjia, Luo Jiancheng, et al. Remote sensing classification method of crops in complex mountainous parcels coupled with spatial distribution patterns[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2025, 54(7): 1215-1229. DOI: .
doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2025.20240440 |
|
| [3] | Ma Xianguang, Tang Bohui, He Feng, et al. Extraction and prediction of spatiotemporal pattern characteristics of farmland non-grain conversion in Yunnan province based on multi-source data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2025, 17(19): 3295. |
| [4] | Xu Weicheng, Lan Yubin, Li Yuanhong, et al. Classification method of cultivated land based on UAV visible light remote sensing[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2019, 12(3): 103-109. |
| [5] | Wu Jiayong, Ding Xue, Wang Jinliang, et al. MAMNet: lightweight multi-attention collaborative network for fine-grained cropland extraction from Gaofen-2 remote sensing imagery[J]. Agriculture, 2025, 15(11): 1152. |
| [6] | 李倩楠, 张杜娟, 潘耀忠, 等. MPSPNet和UNet网络下山东省高分辨耕地遥感提取[J]. 遥感学报, 2023, 27(2): 471-491. |
| Li Qiannan, Zhang Dujuan, Pan Yaozhong, et al. High-resolution cropland extraction in Shandong province using MPSPNet and UNet network[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2023, 27(2): 471-491. | |
| [7] | Liu Han, Wang Yu, Sang Lingling, et al. Evaluation of spatiotemporal changes in cropland quantity and quality with multi-source remote sensing[J]. Land, 2023, 12(9): 1764. |
| [8] | Tao Kunjian, Li He, Huang Chong, et al. Extraction of cropland based on multi-source remote sensing and an improved version of the deep learning-based segment anything model (SAM)[J]. Agronomy, 2025, 15(5): 1139. |
| [9] |
刘巍, 吴志峰, 骆剑承, 等. 深度学习支持下的丘陵山区耕地高分辨率遥感信息分区分层提取方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(1): 105-116. DOI: .
doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20190448 |
|
Liu Wei, Wu Zhifeng, Luo Jiancheng, et al. A divided and stratified extraction method of high-resolution remote sensing information for cropland in hilly and mountainous areas based on deep learning[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2021, 50(1): 105-116. DOI: .
doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20190448 |
|
| [10] | Zhang Dujuan, Zhu Xiufang, Pan Yaozhong, et al. Comparative analysis of deep learning and traditional methods for high-resolution cropland extraction with different training data characteristics[J]. Land, 2025, 14(10): 2038. |
| [11] | Xie Meilin, Liu Gang, He Jing, et al. Fine extraction of cultivated land parcels in Chengdu Plain area based on CDUSU-net network model of Gaofen-2 imagery[J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2025, 53(6): 1785-1798. |
| [12] |
陈启浩, 李广潮, 曹文静, 等. 综合时序光学和SAR数据的南方多云雨地区耕地种植强度提取[J]. 测绘学报, 2024, 53(12): 2361-2374. DOI: .
doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2024.20230497 |
|
Chen Qihao, Li Guangchao, Cao Wenjing, et al. Cropland intensity extraction combined using optical and SAR time-series in cloudy and rainy areas of Southern China[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2024, 53(12): 2361-2374. DOI: .
doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2024.20230497 |
|
| [13] | Liu Shukuan, Cao Shi, Lu Xia, et al. Lightweight deep learning model, ConvNeXt-U: an improved U-Net network for extracting cropland in complex landscapes from Gaofen-2 images[J]. Sensors, 2025, 25(1): 261. |
| [14] | Huang Zhongxin, Jing Haitao, Liu Yueming, et al. Segment anything model combined with multi-scale segmentation for extracting complex cultivated land parcels in high-resolution remote sensing images[J]. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16(18): 3489. |
| [15] | Zhang Dujuan, Li Yiping, Shen Yucai, et al. A dual-branch framework integrating the segment anything model and semantic-aware network for high-resolution cropland extraction[J]. Remote Sensing, 2025, 17(20): 3424. |
| [16] | Fang Zheng, Gong Yuhang, Zhu Heli, et al. A refined SMR-DeepLabV3+ model for cultivated land extraction from cross-view imagery using an attention mechanism[J]. Discover Sustainability, 2025, 6(1): 583. |
| [17] | Lu Yihang, Li Lin, Dong Wen, et al. A method for cropland layer extraction in complex scenes integrating edge features and semantic segmentation[J]. Agriculture, 2024, 14(9): 1553. |
| [18] | 段理, 王石英. 川中丘陵地区撂荒地的遥感提取方法研究[J]. 智能城市, 2023, 9(12): 35-38. |
| Duan Li, Wang Shiying. Research on remote sensing extraction methods for abandoned land in hilly areas of central Sichuan[J]. Intelligent City, 2023, 9(12): 35-38. | |
| [19] | 胡金梅, 董张玉, 杨学志. 一种面向对象的高分辨率遥感影像信息提取方法[J]. 地理空间信息, 2021, 19(9): 10-13, 18. |
| Hu Jinmei, Dong Zhangyu, Yang Xuezhi. Object-oriented high-resolution remote sensing image information extraction method[J]. Geospatial Information, 2021, 19(9): 10-13, 18. | |
| [20] | Chen Yanxi, Xiao Xingzhu, Zhang Yongle, et al. A novel deep learning model for extracting arable land from high-resolution remote sensing images in hilly areas: a case study in the Sichuan Basin of Southwest China[J]. Geocarto International, 2024, 39: 2400493. |
| [21] | Zhang Xinchang, Shi Qian, Sun Ying, et al. The review of land use/land cover mapping AI methodology and application in the era of remote sensing big data[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2024, 7(3): 1-23. |
| [22] | Liu Yunyu, Yuan Jinpeng. ERSNet: Lightweight attention-guided network for remote sensing scene image classification[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2025, 8(1): 30-46. |
| [23] | 王仁儒. 基于多源遥感与深度学习的山地耕地地块提取与分类研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2025. |
| Wang Renru. Research on extraction and classification of mountain cultivated land plots based on multi-source remote sensing and deep learning[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou Normal University, 2025. | |
| [24] | 郭宇航, 黄玉春. 基于Gabor卷积和拓扑连接的耕地地块提取网络[J]. 测绘地理信息, 2025, 50(6): 133-138. |
| Guo Yuhang, Huang Yuchun. Farmland plot extraction network based on Gabor convolution and topological connection[J]. Journal of Geomatics, 2025, 50(6): 133-138. | |
| [25] | 于洋, 李哲凡, 谢淑娟, 等. 基于面向对象法与U-Net模型的广东省云浮市云城区耕地后备资源遥感提取[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2026, 47(1): 42-51. |
| Yu Yang, Li Zhefan, Xie Shujuan, et al. Remote sensing extraction of cultivated land reserve resources in Yuncheng district, Yunfu city, Guangdong province based on object-oriented method and U-Net model[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2026, 47(1): 42-51. | |
| [26] | 侯新刚, 王勤令, 伟锋. 基于多尺度注意力视觉Mamba U-Net的耕地遥感分割方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2026, 57(4): 279-286. |
| Hou Xingang, Wang Qinling, Wei Feng. Remote sensing segmentation of cultivated land based on multi-scale attention vision Mamba U-Net[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2026, 57(4): 279-286. | |
| [27] | Dong Yong, Wang Hongyan, Zhang Yuan, et al. Accurate parcel extraction combined with multi-resolution remote sensing images based on SAM[J]. Agriculture, 2025, 15(9): 976. |
| [28] | Weng Yijie, Li Zongmei, Tang Guofeng, et al. OCNet-based water body extraction from remote sensing images[J]. Water, 2023, 15(20): 3557. |
| [29] |
彭代锋, 刘雪莲, 鲁梦飞, 等. 基于多尺度跨模态特征融合的异源遥感影像洪水变化检测[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(2): 328-343. DOI: .
doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2026.20250331 |
|
Peng Daifeng, Liu Xuelian, Lu Mengfei, et al. Heterogeneous remote sensing image flood change detection based on multi-scale crossmodal feature fusion[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2026, 55(2): 328-343. DOI: .
doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2026.20250331 |
| [1] | 蔺小虎, 闫涛, 杨必胜, 陈驰, 高毅楠, 王相. 面向复杂地下空间的开放词汇语义增强3DGS-SLAM方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(9): 1582-1598. |
| [2] | 熊新, 靳国旺, 李佳豪, 叶豪, 杨乐. 天绘二号双基成像几何的有理函数模型研究[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(9): 1599-1611. |
| [3] | 刘思涵, 邵世维, 逯跃锋, 丁子淇, 牟春霖, 豆孝磊, 吕成哲, 贾志蕊, 焦振洁. 基于可变形自注意力和密度不变关键点检测的异源建筑物点云配准方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(9): 1630-1640. |
| [4] | 冯宝坤. 基于星机地LiDAR数据的多尺度森林地上生物量反演研究[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(9): 1706-1706. |
| [5] | 唐腾峰, 刘人源, 刘畅, 赵彦刚, 潘丹, 叶沅鑫. 模态重构与特征扰动学习相结合的多模态图像匹配方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(8): 1343-1356. |
| [6] | 王建梅, 段瑜, 张绍明, 李炘妍. 融合视觉大模型与图神经网络的举证照片土地利用分类方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(8): 1400-1413. |
| [7] | 陈西江, 曾敏坤, 宣伟, 邹进贵, 花向红. 多尺度超体素特征聚合网络的三维点云语义分割[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(8): 1414-1424. |
| [8] | 孙咏琪, 戴晨光, 张振超, 秦进春, 宿钰. 融合相对深度的高分辨率光学卫星遥感影像跨域语义分割框架[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(8): 1425-1438. |
| [9] | 朱涵, 戴晨光, 张振超, 刘宣广, 卢金浩. 基于几何结构优化和熵注意力机制的点云变化检测方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(8): 1439-1451. |
| [10] | 赵翔宇, 张春菊, 裴一帆, 李晨曦, 张俊, 徐薇, 兰春, 吕临峰, 梁宏博. SCA-SAM:基于尺度上下文注意力与SAM高效迁移的遥感影像语义分割方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(8): 1452-1464. |
| [11] | 贾诗超. 青藏工程走廊多年冻土地表形变与活动层厚度的主动微波遥感监测[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(8): 1513-1513. |
| [12] | 贺一波. 利用三维点云数据提取矿区地表损害信息的算法研究[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(8): 1516-1516. |
| [13] | 包馨. 豫东平原农作物物候与土壤水分SAR遥感监测及动态演化分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(8): 1520-1520. |
| [14] | 龚俊, 罗建军, 柯胜男, 黎施彬, 陈蔚聪, 秦乐, 汤圣君. 一种自适应剪枝的室内场景三维高斯SLAM实时高保真建模方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(7): 1266-1277. |
| [15] | 谭清华, 齐恒, 施泓羽, 唐炉亮, 阚子涵, 杨红, 孙乐乐, 刘亚非, 顾正雄. 城市场景多源低空风险量化与航路生成[J]. 测绘学报, 2026, 55(7): 1306-1320. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||