验潮站和深海压力仪用于卫星高度计性能评估的可行性分析

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2019.20170655

测绘学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 161-168.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2019.20170655

验潮站和深海压力仪用于卫星高度计性能评估的可行性分析

管斌^1,2,3, 孙中苗^1,3, 刘晓刚^1,3, 翟振和^1,3

1. 地理信息工程国家重点实验室, 陕西西安 710054;
2. 信息工程大学地理空间信息学院, 河南郑州 450052;
3. 西安测绘研究所, 陕西西安 710054

收稿日期:2017-11-27 修回日期:2018-09-06 出版日期:2019-02-20 发布日期:2019-03-02
作者简介:管斌(1988-),男,博士,助理研究员,研究方向为卫星测高和空间地球物理测量。E-mail:pershingb@gmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41774018；41674082）；地理信息工程国家重点实验室自主研究课题（SKLGIE2018-ZZ-4）

Feasibility analysis of performance validation for satellite altimeters using tide gauge and deep-ocean bottom pressure recorder

GUAN Bin^1,2,3, SUN Zhongmiao^1,3, LIU Xiaogang^1,3, ZHAI Zhenhe^1,3

1. State Key Laboratory of Geo-information Engineering, Xi'an 710054, China;
2. Institute of Geography Spatial Information, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450052, China;
3. Xi'an Research Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Xi'an 710054, China

Received:2017-11-27 Revised:2018-09-06 Online:2019-02-20 Published:2019-03-02
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41774018;41674082);The Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Geo-information Engineering (No. SKLGIE2018-ZZ-4)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在传统卫星高度计定标途径之外，探索了远海孤岛验潮站和深海压力仪分别用于卫星高度计性能评估的可行性。采用Harvest石油平台验潮站、1890000号验潮站和21419号深海压力仪，计算了Jason-3测量海面高偏差以及Jason-2、Jason-3海面高之间的相对偏差。由3种设备得到的Jason-3海面高偏差序列的标准差分别为3.98、2.87、8.61 cm，Jason-2、Jason-3海面高之间的相对偏差（Jason-3-Jason-2）分别为-3.62±2.17、-2.58±1.97、-2.60±1.30 cm，与国外定标站计算结果相比较，结果表明：Jason-3海面高相比于Jason-2海面高低约3.0 cm；选用的深海压力仪适合用于Jason-2、Jason-3之间海面高相对偏差的计算，但不适用于单颗卫星的定标或性能评估；远海孤岛验潮站适用于两者。

关键词: 卫星测高, 高度计定标, 验潮站, 海啸深海评估与预警, 相对偏差, 压力仪

Abstract:

Independent of traditional approach of satellite altimeter calibration, the feasibility of altimeter validation using tide gauge located on solitary island at open sea (TGSI) and deep-ocean bottom pressure recorder (BPR) separately is initially studied. Bias of Jason-3 sea surface height (SSH) and relative SSH bias (△bias) between Jason-2 and Jason-3 is calculated using the data of tide gauge on Harvest oil platform, tide gauge No.1890000 and BPR No.21419. The standard deviations of calculated SSH bias sequence are 3.98 cm, 2.87 cm and 8.61 cm respectively, and △bias (Jason-3-Jason-2) is -3.62±2.17 cm, -2.58±1.97 cm and -2.60±1.30 cm respectively. Comparing to the results reported by foreign calibration sites, the results show that Jason-3 SSH is 3.0 cm lower than that of Jason-2. The selected BPR is appropriate to the calculation of relative SSH bias between Jason-2 and Jason-3, but it is not suitable for calibration or validation of single satellite. TGSI is appropriate to both.

Key words: satellite altimetry, altimeter calibration, tide gauge, deep-ocean assessment and reporting of Tsunamis, relative bias, pressure recorder

中图分类号:

P228

管斌, 孙中苗, 刘晓刚, 翟振和. 验潮站和深海压力仪用于卫星高度计性能评估的可行性分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(2): 161-168.

GUAN Bin, SUN Zhongmiao, LIU Xiaogang, ZHAI Zhenhe. Feasibility analysis of performance validation for satellite altimeters using tide gauge and deep-ocean bottom pressure recorder[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2019, 48(2): 161-168.

参考文献

[1] HAINES B J, DONG D, BORN G H, et al. The Harvest experiment:monitoring Jason-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon from a California offshore platform[J]. Marine geodesy, 2003, 26(3-4):239-259.
[2] HAINES B J, DESAI S D, BORN G H. The Harvest experiment:calibration of the climate data record from TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1 and the ocean surface topography mission[J]. Marine geodesy, 2010, 33(S1):91-113.
[3] CHRISTENSEN E J, HAINES B J, KEIHM S J, et al. Calibration of TOPEX/Poseidon at platform Harvest[J]. Journal of geophysical research, 1994, 99(C12):24465-24485.
[4] BONNEFOND P, EXERTIER P, LAURAIN O, et al. Absolute calibration of Jason-1 and Jason-2 altimeters in corsica during the formation flight phase[J]. Marine geodesy, 2010, 33(S1):80-90.
[5] BONNEFOND P, EXERTIER P, LAURAIN O, et al. SARAL/AltiKa absolute calibration from the multi-mission corsica facilities[J]. Marine geodesy, 2015, 38(S1):171-192.
[6] BONNEFOND P, EXERTIER P, LAURAIN O, et al. Absolute calibration of Jason-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon altimeters in Corsica[J]. Marine geodesy, 2003, 26(3-4):261-284.
[7] WATSON C, WHITE N, COLEMAN R, et al. TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1:absolute calibration in Bass Strait, Australia[J]. Marine geodesy, 2004, 27(1-2):107-131.
[8] WATSON C, WHITE N, CHURCH J, et al. Absolute calibration in Bass Strait, Australia:TOPEX, Jason-1 and OSTM/Jason-2[J]. Marine geodesy, 2011, 34(3-4):242-260.
[9] WATSON C, COLEMAN R, WHITE N, et al. Absolute calibration of TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason-1 using GPS buoys in Bass Strait, Australia special issue:Jason-1 calibration/validation[J]. Marine geodesy, 2003, 26(3-4):285-304.
[10] BONNEFOND P, HAINES B J, WATSON C. In situ absolute calibration and validation:a link from coastal to open-ocean altimetry[M]//Coastal altimetry.Berlin:Springer, 2011:259-296.
[11] JIANG Xingwei, LIN Mingsen, LIU Jianqiang, et al. The HY-2 satellite and its preliminary assessment[J]. International journal of digital Earth, 2012, 5(3):266-281.
[12] MERTIKAS S P, IOANNIDES R T, TZIAVOS I N, et al. Statistical models and latest results in the determination of the absolute bias for the radar altimeters of Jason satellites using the Gavdos facility[J]. Marine geodesy, 2010, 33(S1):114-149.
[13] MERTIKAS S P, DASKALAKIS A, TZIAVOS I N, et al. Altimetry, bathymetry and geoid variations at the Gavdos permanent Cal/Val facility[J]. Advances in space research, 2013, 51(8):1418-1437.
[14] MERTIKAS S P, DASKALAKIS A, TZIAVOS I N, et al. First calibration results for the SARAL/AltiKa altimetric mission using the Gavdos permanent facilities[J]. Marine geodesy, 2015, 38(S1):249-259.
[15] MERTIKAS S P, ZHOU Xinghua, QIAO Fangli, et al. First preliminary results for the absolute calibration of the Chinese HY-2 altimetric mission using the CRS1 calibration facilities in West Crete, Greece[J]. Advances in space research, 2016, 57(1):78-95.
[16] FU L L, CHRISTENSEN E J, YAMARONE C A, et al. TOPEX/Poseidon mission overview[J]. Journal of geophysical research, 1994,99(C12):24369-24381.
[17] LAMBIN J, MORROW R, FU L L, et al. The OSTM/Jason-2 mission[J]. Marine geodesy, 2010, 33(S1):4-25.
[18] DUMONT J P, ROSMORDUC V, CARRERE L, et al. Jason-3 products handbook (issue:1 rev 2)[R]. Paris:CNES, 2016.
[19] PERCIVAL D B, DENBO D W, EBLÉ M C, et al. Extraction of Tsunami source coefficients via inversion of DART^® buoy data[J]. Natural hazards, 2011,58(1):567-590.
[20] 管斌, 孙中苗, 翟振和, 等. 卫星高度计绝对定标中海面高梯度的计算[J]. 海洋测绘, 2018, 38(3):26-29, 56. GUAN Bin, SUN Zhongmiao, ZHAI Zhenhe, et al. Calculation of sea surface gradient in the process of satellite altimeter absolute calibration[J]. Hydrographic surveying and charting, 2018, 38(3):26-29, 56.
[21] HAINES B, DESAI S, SHAH R, et al. The Harvest experiment:connecting Jason-3 to the long-term sea level record[R]//The Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting 2016. La Rochelle, France:[s.n.], 2016.
[22] WATSON C, LEGRESY B, KING M, et al. Altimeter absolute bias estimates from Bass Strait, Australia[R]//The Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting 2016. La Rochelle, France:[s.n.], 2016.
[23] BONNEFOND P, EXTERTIER P, LAURAIN O, et al. Corsica:a multi-mission absolute calibration site[R]//The Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting 2016. La Rochelle, France:[s.n.], 2016.
[24] MÉNARD Y, FU L L, ESCUDIER P, et al. The Jason-1 mission special issue:Jason-1 calibration/validation[J]. Marine geodesy, 2003, 26(3-4):131-146.
[25] DETTMERING D, SCHWATKE C. Global multi-mission crossover analysis:performance of Jason-3 and other new data sets[R]//The Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting 2016. La Rochelle, France:[s.n.], 2016.

验潮站和深海压力仪用于卫星高度计性能评估的可行性分析

Feasibility analysis of performance validation for satellite altimeters using tide gauge and deep-ocean bottom pressure recorder

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐天河, 穆大鹏, 闫昊明, 郭金运, 尹鹏. 近20年海平面变化成因研究进展及挑战[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1294-1305.
[2]	孙中苗, 管斌, 翟振和, 欧阳明达. 海洋卫星测高及其反演全球海洋重力场和海底地形模型研究进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(6): 923-934.
[3]	宗敬文, 李厚朴, 纪兵, 欧阳永忠. 测高重力异常中央区奇异积分数值求积公式[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(10): 1308-1319.
[4]	胡敏章, 张胜军, 金涛勇, 文汉江, 褚永海, 姜卫平, 李建成. 新一代全球海底地形模型BAT_WHU2020[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(8): 939-954.
[5]	陈俊霖, 周春霞, 赵秋阳. 2003—2018年Byrd冰川流域冰下湖活动及水文联系——多源卫星测高数据监测结果分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(5): 547-556.
[6]	张胜军, 李建成, 孔祥雪. 基于Laplace方程的垂线偏差法反演全球海域重力异常[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(4): 452-460.
[7]	赵鸿彬, 谷延超, 范东明, 邱春洪, 宿春鹏, 方伟浩. 联合卫星测高、GRACE与温盐数据分析红海海平面变化季节性特征[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(9): 1119-1128.
[8]	柯宝贵, 张利明, 章传银, 党亚民. 卫星测高与船载重力测量数据融合的点质量拟合法[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(7): 924-929.
[9]	吴富梅, 魏子卿, 刘光明. 通过大港验潮站坐标确定我国高程基准的垂直偏差[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(10): 1295-1300.
[10]	王虎彪, 王勇, 柴华, 鲍李峰. 中国西太平洋海域1'×1'垂线偏差模型及精度评估[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(9): 1073-1079.
[11]	赵红, 涂锐, 刘智, 蒋光伟. 利用GPS动态PPP技术求解海潮负荷位移[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(8): 988-998.
[12]	周兴华, 付延光, 许军. 海洋垂直基准研究进展与展望[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(10): 1770-1777.
[13]	管斌, 孙中苗, 刘晓刚, 翟振和. 双星串飞编队卫星测高模式下高度计相对定标[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(1): 44-52.
[14]	张小红, 马兰, 李盼. 利用动态PPP技术确定海潮负荷位移[J]. 测绘学报, 2016, 45(6): 631-638.
[15]	吴富梅, 魏子卿, 李迎春. 大港验潮站潮汐分析与国家高程基准面变化[J]. 测绘学报, 2015, 44(7): 709-716.