传感网支持下的洪涝事件过程监测与准实时服务方法及验证

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20180378

测绘学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 191-201.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20180378

传感网支持下的洪涝事件过程监测与准实时服务方法及验证

杜文英^1,2, 陈能成^1,3, 袁赛¹

1. 武汉大学测绘遥感信息工程国家重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430079;
2. 长江水利委员会长江科学院, 湖北武汉 430010;
3. 武汉大学地球空间信息技术协同创新中心, 湖北武汉 430079

收稿日期:2018-08-15 修回日期:2019-10-11 发布日期:2020-03-03
通讯作者: 陈能成 E-mail:cnc@whu.edu.cn
作者简介:杜文英(1989-),女,博士,副研究员,研究方向为洪涝灾害感知。E-mail:duwenying@whu.edu.cn
基金资助:
长江科学院开放研究基金（CKWV2018487/KY）；中国博士后科学基金会面上资助项目（2017M622502）；国家重点研发计划（2018YFB2100500；2017YFB0503803）；国家自然科学基金委资助项目（41601406；41771422；41971351）；湖北省自然科学基金（ZRMS2017000698）

Flood events process detection and near realtime service based on sensor web

DU Wenying^1,2, CHEN Nengcheng^1,3, YUAN Sai¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan 430010, China;
3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Geospatial Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received:2018-08-15 Revised:2019-10-11 Published:2020-03-03
Supported by:
CRSRI Open Research Program (No. CKWV2018487/KY);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017M622502);The National Key Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2018YFB2100500;2017YFB0503803);The National Nature Science Foundation of China Program (Nos. 41601406;41771422;41971351);The Nature Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. ZRMS2017000698)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 洪涝过程探测与准实时服务对于保障人民生命和财产安全意义重大。通常洪涝探测仅关注洪涝断面/平均状态，缺乏对洪涝从发生、发展乃至最后结束的全过程的整体认知，且洪涝探测和服务被动滞后。本文制定洪涝过程探测规则，改进水位预测模型，并将其作为理论基础，与传感网信息模型和服务接口相结合，提出了洪涝过程动态探测与准实时服务（process-based flood detection and service，PFD&S）方法。以PFD&S方法为基础，设计并开发了PFD&S原型系统，该系统由传感器层、数据接入层、洪涝探测层和用户交互层4层组成，且具备传感器数据发布和洪涝事件订阅两种使用模式。文中以2016年夏季发生在黄汉流域的洪涝事件为例，对PFD&S方法的可行性和有效性进行验证。结果表明，PFD&S方法和系统能够精准判断洪涝事件所处阶段，并根据不同阶段的需求提供水位预测、洪涝预警或洪涝信息统计等服务，且方法具备准实时性和可扩展性特征。

关键词: 洪涝, 全生命周期, 探测, 准实时服务, 传感网

Abstract: Full life cycle flood detection and service (FD&S) is of great significance to ensuring people's lives and properties. Flood detection methods generally focuses on the flood section/average state, lack of the overall understanding of the flood process from the occurrence, through the development, and to the end of floods, and the detection and service of floods are passive and lagging.This paper made the flood process detection rule and improved the water level prediction model, which were employed as theoretical foundations, and combined them with sensor web to construct the process-based FD&S (PFD&S) method.Based on the PFD&S method,this paper developed the PFD&S prototype, which consists of the sensor layer, the data access layer, the flood detection layer, and the user interaction layer, and has the two operating modes of data publishing and flood subscription. The floods occurring in the Huanghan basin, Hubei, China in the summer of 2016 were selected as the case studies to test the feasibility and validation of the PFD&S method and prototype. The results demonstrated that the proposed PFD&S method and prototype could precisely determine the flood phases, provide the water level prediction, alert, and information statistics services according to the requirements of different flood phases, and the PFD&S method featured instantaneity and extensibility.

Key words: flood, full life cycle, detection, near realtime service, sensor web

中图分类号:

P237

杜文英, 陈能成, 袁赛. 传感网支持下的洪涝事件过程监测与准实时服务方法及验证[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(2): 191-201.

DU Wenying, CHEN Nengcheng, YUAN Sai. Flood events process detection and near realtime service based on sensor web[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2020, 49(2): 191-201.

参考文献

[1] GUHA-SAPIR D, HOYOIS P, WALLEMACQ P, et al. Annual disaster statistical review 2016:the numbers and trends[EB/OL].[2017-10-31]. https://www.preventionweb.net/publications/view/56027.
[2] 丁雨淋. 水文变化驱动的暴雨-洪涝灾害主动模拟方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2016, 45(2):252. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20150293. DING Yulin. Hydrological changes driven storm flood disaster simulation method[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2016, 45(2):252. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20150293.
[3] AUYNIRUNDRONKOOL K, CHEN Nengcheng, PENG Caihua, et al. Flood detection and mapping of the Thailand Central plain using RADARSAT and MODIS under a sensor web environment[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2012, 14(1):245-255.
[4] AMITRANO D, DI MARTINO G, IODICE A, et al. Unsupervised rapid flood mapping using sentinel-1 GRD SAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(6):3290-3299.
[5] CIAN F, MARCONCINI M, CECCATO P. Normalized difference flood index for rapid flood mapping:taking advantage of EO big data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 209:712-730.
[6] YAMAZAKI D, TRIGG M A, IKESHIMA D. Development of a global~90 m water body map using multi-temporal Landsat images[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 171:337-351.
[7] BÁEZ H, VERGARA-LAURENS I, TORRES-MOLINA L, et al. A real-time flood alert system for parking lots[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference. Las Vegas, NV:IEEE, 2017:1-5.
[8] HIROI K, KAWAGUCHI N. FloodEye:real-time flash flood prediction system for urban complex water flow[C]//Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Sensors. Orlando, FL:IEEE, 2016:1-3.
[9] GAO Wei, SHEN Qiu, ZHOU Yuehua, et al. Analysis of flood inundation in ungauged basins based on multi-source remote sensing data[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2018, 190(3):129.
[10] SHI Haiyun, LI Tiejian, LIU Ronghua, et al. A service-oriented architecture for ensemble flood forecast from numerical weather prediction[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 527:933-942.
[11] FOHRINGER J, DRANSCH D, KREIBICH H, et al. Social media as an information source for rapid flood inundation mapping[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2015, 15(12):2725-2738.
[12] POSER K, DRANSCH D. Volunteered geographic information for disaster management with application to rapid flood damage estimation[J]. Geomatica, 2010, 64(1):89-98.
[13] MUELLER N, LEWIS A, ROBERTS D, et al. Water observations from space:mapping surface water from 25 years of Landsat imagery across Australia[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 174:341-352.
[14] PEKEL J F, COTTAM A, GORELICK N, et al. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes[J]. Nature, 2016, 540(7633):418-422.
[15] COHEN J, RIIHIMÄKI H, PULLIAINEN J, et al. Implications of boreal forest stand characteristics for X-band SAR flood mapping accuracy[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 186:47-63.
[16] DU Wenying, CHEN Nengcheng, LIU Dandan. Topology adaptive water boundary extraction based on a modified balloon snake:using GF-1 satellite images as an example[J]. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(2):140.
[17] DU Wenying, CHEN Nengcheng, LIU Dandan. Automatic balloon snake method for topology adaptive water boundary extraction:using GF-1 satellite imagery as an example[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2017, 10(12):5381-5394.
[18] REVILLA-ROMERO B, THIELEN J, SALAMON P, et al. Evaluation of the satellite-based global flood detection system for measuring river discharge:influence of local factors[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2014, 18(11):4467-4484.
[19] ALFIERI L, BUREK P, DUTRA E, et al. GloFAS-global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 17(3):1161-1175.
[20] REAGER J T, FAMIGLIETTI J S. Global terrestrial water storage capacity and flood potential using GRACE[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2009, 36(23):L23402.
[21] ARNAL L, CLOKE H L, STEPHENS E, et al. Skilful seasonal forecasts of streamflow over Europe?[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2018, 22(4):2057-2072.
[22] ACOSTA-COLL M, BALLESTER-MERELO F, MARTÍNEZ-PEIRÓ M. Early warning system for detection of urban pluvial flooding hazard levels in an ungauged basin[J]. Natural Hazards, 2018, 92(2):1237-1265.
[23] DARAND M, SOHRABI M M. Identifying drought- and flood-prone areas based on significant changes in daily precipitation over Iran[J]. Natural Hazards, 2018, 90(3):1427-1446.
[24] MORENO H A, VIVONI E R, GOCHIS D J. Limits to flood forecasting in the colorado front range for two summer convection periods using radar nowcasting and a distributed hydrologic model[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2013, 14(4):1075-1097.
[25] FENG Yu, SESTER M. Extraction of pluvial flood relevant volunteered geographic information (VGI) by deep learning from user generated texts and photos[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2018, 7(2):39.
[26] WITHEROW M A, ELBAKARY M I, IFTEKHARUDDIN K M, et al. Analysis of crowdsourced images for flooding detection[C]//Proceedings of the VI ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Vision and Medical Image Processing Porto. Portugal:Springer, 2017:140-149.
[27] 李德仁. 从测绘学到地球空间信息智能服务科学[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(10):1207-1212. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20170263. LI Deren. From geomatics to geospatial intelligent service science[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2017, 46(10):1207-1212. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20170263.
[28] 袁赛, 陈能成, 肖长江, 等. 存算分离的原位传感器观测接入方法[J]. 计算机系统应用, 2017, 26(7):90-96. YUAN Sai, CHEN Nengcheng, XIAO Changjiang, et al. Storage-computation separation method for in-situ sensor observation access[J]. Computer Systems & Applications, 2017, 26(7):90-96.
[29] CHEN Nengcheng, DU Wenying, SONG Fan, et al. FLCNDEMF:an event metamodel for flood process information management under the sensor web environment[J]. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7(6):7231-7256.
[30] 李云良, 张奇, 李淼, 等. 基于BP神经网络的鄱阳湖水位模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(2):233-240. LI Yunliang, ZHANG Qi, LI Miao, et al. Using BP neural networks for water level simulation in poyang lake[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(2):233-240.

传感网支持下的洪涝事件过程监测与准实时服务方法及验证

Flood events process detection and near realtime service based on sensor web

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王桥. 地表异常遥感探测与即时诊断方法研究框架[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1141-1152.
[2]	张克非, 李浩博, 王晓明, 朱丹彤, 何琦敏, 李龙江, 胡安东, 郑南山, 李怀展. 地基GNSS大气水汽探测遥感研究进展和展望[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1172-1191.
[3]	林珲, 吴贤宇, 潘家祎, 邹海波. 中国城市洪涝实时预报研究:现状与挑战[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1306-1316.
[4]	许强, 朱星, 李为乐, 董秀军, 戴可人, 蒋亚楠, 陆会燕, 郭晨. “天-空-地”协同滑坡监测技术进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1416-1436.
[5]	童小华, 刘世杰, 谢欢, 许雄, 叶真, 冯永玖, 王超, 柳思聪, 金雁敏, 陈鹏, 洪中华, 栾奎峰. 从地球测绘到地外天体测绘[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(4): 488-500.
[6]	蔡成林, 沈文波, 曾武陵, 于洪刚, 谢小平. 多普勒积分重构与STPIR联合周跳探测与修复[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(2): 160-168.
[7]	邸凯昌, 王镓, 邢琰, 刘召芹, 万文辉, 彭嫚, 王晔昕, 刘斌, 于天一, 李立春, 刘传凯. 深空探测车环境感知与导航定位技术进展与展望[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(11): 1457-1468.
[8]	胡冯伟, 乔俊军, 陈张健, 龚丽芳, 李爱勤. 改进的地图制图点注记配置探测信息模型[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(1): 132-141.
[9]	杨必胜, 宗泽亮, 陈驰, 孙文鹿, 米晓新, 吴唯同, 黄荣刚. 车载探地雷达地下目标实时探测法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(7): 874-882.
[10]	何振宇, 陈武, 杨扬. GPS天-地无源双基地雷达探测海面移动目标[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(12): 1523-1534.
[11]	颜金彪, 吴波, 彭馨. 顾及Gestalt邻近与简化原则的平面点集形状重建[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(11): 1485-1496.
[12]	李文涛, 颜雄, 夏磊, 任青阳, 陈洁, 潘雄. BDS卫星钟差半参数平差模型异常数据探测与处理[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(1): 55-64.
[13]	龚健雅, 张翔, 向隆刚, 陈能成. 智慧城市综合感知与智能决策的进展及应用[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(12): 1482-1497.
[14]	邸凯昌, 刘斌, 辛鑫, 岳宗玉, 叶乐佳. 月球轨道器影像摄影测量制图进展及应用[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(12): 1562-1574.
[15]	闫广峰, 岑敏仪. L₁范数探测粗差失效的观测量识别方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(11): 1430-1438.