后验概率与最小均方误差解结合的GNSS部分模糊度解算策略

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20180295

测绘学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (S0): 54-60.doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20180295

后验概率与最小均方误差解结合的GNSS部分模糊度解算策略

吴泽民^1,2, 边少锋¹

1. 海军工程大学, 湖北武汉 430033;
2. 91919部队, 湖北黄冈 438021

收稿日期:2018-06-27 修回日期:2018-12-28 出版日期:2018-12-31 发布日期:2019-05-18
作者简介:吴泽民(1988-),男,博士,工程师,研究方向为卫星导航与无线电通信技术。E-mail:wzm_hust@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41504029；41274013）

GNSS Partial Ambiguity Resolution Based on Posterior Probability and Minimum Squares Error Solution

WU Zemin^1,2, BIAN Shaofeng¹

1. Naval University of Engineering,Wuhan 430033,China;
2. Troops 91919, Huanggang 438021,China

Received:2018-06-27 Revised:2018-12-28 Online:2018-12-31 Published:2019-05-18
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41504029;41274013)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在GNSS弱定位模型中，常常需要采用模糊度部分解算方法获得满意的定位精度。为了进一步提升定位的准确性，本文从3个方面对模糊度部分解算方法进行改进：①决定模糊度被固定元素的依据不再是完全基于模型的Bootstraping成功率，而是同时基于模型和观测数据的后验概率。②当模糊度部分固定时，未固定的模糊度元素不再取条件浮点解，而是取基于已固定元素的最小均方误差解。③当模糊度完全不固定时，模糊度向量不再取浮点解，而是取最小均方误差解。试验中用一组北斗实测数据检验了原GNSS模糊度部分解算方法和新方法。结果表明，新方法部分固定和不固定历元数量少于传统方法，且定位精度显著提高。

关键词: GNSS, 模糊度部分解算, 定位精度, 后验概率, 最小均方误差

Abstract: GNSS partial ambiguity resolution (PAR) is usually used in weak GNSS positioning model to gain an acceptable position solution. In order to further improve the positioning precise of PAR, this contribution modifies RAR from 3 aspects. ① Whether an element of the ambiguity vector is fixed is determined by the posterior probability instead of the Bootstrapping success rate. For the reason that posterior probability is based on data and model simultaneously, whereas Bootstrapping success rate is only determined by GNSS positioning model. ②In the ambiguity partially fixed cases, the minimum squares error (MSE) solution of unfixed elements is calculated by the correlation with other fixed ones. However, traditional PAR treats them as conditional float solutions. ③ In the ambiguity totally unfixed cases, the MSE solution of the whole ambiguity vector is used to take the place of its float solution. In the experiment, a set of BDS real observed data are used to testify the property of traditional and new PAR. The results show that the partial fixed and unfixed cases for our new PAR method are less than that for the traditional one, and the position precise is sufficiently improved.

Key words: GNSS, partial ambiguity resolution, positioning precise, posterior probability, MSE

中图分类号:

P228

吴泽民, 边少锋. 后验概率与最小均方误差解结合的GNSS部分模糊度解算策略[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(S0): 54-60.

WU Zemin, BIAN Shaofeng. GNSS Partial Ambiguity Resolution Based on Posterior Probability and Minimum Squares Error Solution[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2018, 47(S0): 54-60.

参考文献

[1] WU Zemin, BIAN Shaofeng, JI Bing, et al. Short Baseline GPS Multi-frequency Single-epoch Precise Positioning:Utilizing A New Carrier Phase Combination Method[J]. GPS Solutions, 2016, 20(3):373-384.
[2] WU Zemin, LI Houpu, BIAN Shaofeng. Cycled Efficient V-BLAST GNSS Ambiguity Decorrelation and Search Complexity Estimation[J]. GPS Solutions, 2017, 21(4):1829-1840.
[3] TEUNISSEN P J G, JOOSTEN P, TIBERIUS C C J M. Geometry-free Ambiguity Success Rates in Case of Partial Fixing[C]//Proceedings of 1999 National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation. San Diego, CA:[s.n.], 1999:201-207.
[4] 潘宗鹏, 柴洪洲, 刘军, 等. 基于部分整周模糊度固定的非差GPS精密单点定位方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2015, 44(11):1210-1218. PAN Zongpeng, CHAI Hongzhou, LIU Jun, et al. GPS Partial Ambiguity Resolution Method for Zero-difference Precise Point Positioning[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2015, 44(11):1210-1218.
[5] DAI L, ESLINGER D, SHARPE T. Innovative Algorithms to Improve Long Range RTK Reliability and Availability[C]//Proceedings of 2007 National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation. San Diego, CA:Institute of Navigation, 2007:860-872.
[6] PARKINS A. Increasing GNSS RTK Availability with A New Single-Epoch Batch Partial Ambiguity Resolution Algorithm[J]. GPS Solutions, 2011, 15(4):391-402.
[7] KHANAFSEH S, PERVAN B. New Approach for Calculating Position Domain Integrity Risk for Cycle Resolution in Carrier Phase Navigation Systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2010, 46(1):296-307.
[8] VERHAGEN S, TEUNISSEN P J G, VAN DER MAREL H, et al. GNSS Ambiguity Resolution:Which Subset to Fix?[C]//Proceedings of IGNSS Symposium 2011. Sydney, Australia:University of New South Wales, 2011.
[9] HOU Yanqing, VERHAGEN S. Model and Data Driven Partial Ambiguity Resolution for Multi-constellation GNSS[M]//SUN Jiadong, JIAO Wenhai, WU Haitao, et al. China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2014 Proceedings:Volume Ⅱ. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 2014:285-302.
[10] EULER H J, SCHAFFRIN B. On A Measure for the Discernibility between Different Ambiguity Solutions in the Static-kinematic GPS-mode[M]//SCHWARZ K P, Lachapelle G. Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Surveying, and Remote Sensing. New York, NY:Springer, 1991:285-295.
[11] 卢立果, 刘万科, 李江卫. 降相关对模糊度解算中搜索效率的影响分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2015, 44(5):481-487. LU Liguo, LIU Wanke, LI Jiangwei. Impact of Decorrelation on Search Efficiency of Ambiguity Resolution[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2015, 44(5):481-487.
[12] TEUNISSEN J P G. The Least-squares Ambiguity Decorrelation Adjustment:A Method for Fast GPS Integer Ambiguity Estimation[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 1995, 70(1-2):65-82.
[13] TEUNISSEN P J G. An Optimality Property of the Integer Least-squares Estimator[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 1999, 73(11):587-593.
[14] BLEWITT G. Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution for the Global Positioning System Applied to Geodetic Baselines up to 2000 km[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1989, 94(B8):10187-10203.
[15] 周扬眉, 刘经南, 刘基余. 回代解算的LAMBDA方法及其搜索空间[J]. 测绘学报, 2005, 34(4):300-304. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1595.2005.04.004. ZHOU Yangmei, LIU Jingnan, LIU Jiyu. Return-calculating LAMBDA Approach and Its Search Space[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2005, 34(4):300-304. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1595.2005.04.004.
[16] 范龙, 翟国君, 柴洪洲. 模糊度降相关的整数分块正交化算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2014, 43(8):818-826. DOI:10.13485/j.cnki.11-2089.2014.0094. FAN Long, ZHAI Guojun, CHAI Hongzhou. Ambiguity Decorrelation with Integer Block Orthogonalization Algorithm[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2014, 43(8):818-826. DOI:10.13485/j.cnki.11-2089.2014.0094.
[17] VERHAGEN S, TEUNISSEN P J G. The Ratio Test for Future GNSS Ambiguity Resolution[J]. GPS Solutions, 2013, 17(4):535-548.
[18] ZHU J, DING X, CHEN Y. Maximum-likelihood Ambiguity Resolution Based on Bayesian Principle[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2001, 75(4):175-187.
[19] WU Zemin, BIAN Shaofeng. GNSS Integer Ambiguity Validation Based on Posterior Probability[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2015, 89(10):961-977.
[20] DE JONGE P, TIBERIUS C C J M. LAMBDA Method for Integer Ambiguity Estimation:Implementation Aspects[R]. Delft:Delft University of Technology, 1996.

后验概率与最小均方误差解结合的GNSS部分模糊度解算策略

GNSS Partial Ambiguity Resolution Based on Posterior Probability and Minimum Squares Error Solution

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张克非, 李浩博, 王晓明, 朱丹彤, 何琦敏, 李龙江, 胡安东, 郑南山, 李怀展. 地基GNSS大气水汽探测遥感研究进展和展望[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1172-1191.
[2]	党亚民, 杨强, 王伟, 梁玉可. 基于块体模型的青藏高原及邻区地壳三维构造形变分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1192-1205.
[3]	袁运斌, 侯鹏宇, 张宝成. GNSS非差非组合数据处理与PPP-RTK高精度定位[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1225-1238.
[4]	金双根, 汪奇生, 史奇奇. 单频到五频多系统GNSS精密单点定位参数估计与应用[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1239-1248.
[5]	李星星, 张伟, 袁勇强, 张柯柯, 吴家齐, 娄嘉庆, 李婕, 郑鸿杰. GNSS卫星精密定轨综述:现状、挑战与机遇[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1271-1293.
[6]	王任享, 王建荣. 我国卫星摄影测量发展及其进步[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(6): 804-810.
[7]	孙中苗, 管斌, 翟振和, 欧阳明达. 海洋卫星测高及其反演全球海洋重力场和海底地形模型研究进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(6): 923-934.
[8]	姚宜斌, 赵庆志. GNSS对流层水汽监测研究进展与展望[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(6): 935-952.
[9]	邓志国, 王君刚, 葛茂荣. GBM快速轨道产品及非差模糊度固定对其精度的改进[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(4): 544-555.
[10]	赵庆志, 杜正, 姚顽强, 姚宜斌. GNSS约束的MERSI/FY-3A PWV校准方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(2): 159-168.
[11]	王洁, 王娜子, 徐天河, 高凡, 贺匀峤. 组合GNSS观测值反演海面高度[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(2): 201-211.
[12]	何秀凤, 詹伟, 施宏凯. 顾及边界信号及垂直约束的GNSS水汽层析方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(7): 853-862.
[13]	邵凯, 张厚喆, 秦显平, 黄志勇, 易彬, 谷德峰. 分布式InSAR编队卫星精密绝对和相对轨道确定[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(5): 580-588.
[14]	朋子涵, 高成发, 刘永胜, 张瑞成, 尚睿. 手机GNSS数据质量提取的变分模态分解法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(4): 475-486.
[15]	张文渊, 张书毕, 郑南山, 丁楠, 刘鑫, 马朋序. GNSS/MODIS信号紧耦合水汽层析算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(4): 496-508.