Influence of individual characteristics on spatial cognitive ability in desktop virtual environment and real scene

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20200134

Abstract

Abstract: Using virtual geographic environment to simulate, express and reconstruct real environment is one of the main experimental research paradigms in the domain of spatial cognitive science. To investigate whether people’s cognitive performance in virtual environment is consistent with that in real environment, this paper designs a control experiment to test the spatial cognition differences of participants in desktop virtual environment and real environment, where the spatial cognition is decomposed into three dimensions: pattern cognition, object cognition and spatial response, so that the influence of individual characteristics on spatial cognition and its environmental effects can be deduced. The results show that: ① neither environment type nor individual characteristics have significant impact on the spatial cognition; ② the participants with geographical knowledge background, rotating their mental map, and using coordinated spatial reference frame have more detailed and accurate cognition on the spatial pattern; ③ the environment type has no significant effect on the path response, but has a significant effect on the corner response. Besides, the participants can identify the correct direction more effectively in virtual environment. The positive effect of their professional knowledge is significant, and MRT level and environment type have significant joint effect. These outcomes have proved that cognitive simulation experiments can work well in a desktop virtual environment. They are also instructive to establish personalized virtual environment according to user characteristics.

Key words: virtual environment, real environment, spatial cognition, individual difference, environmental effect

CLC Number:

P208

HUANG Lina, ZHANG Dingrao, YING Shen, AI Tinghua. Influence of individual characteristics on spatial cognitive ability in desktop virtual environment and real scene[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2021, 50(4): 509-521.

References

[1] 林珲, 朱庆, 陈旻. 有无相生虚实互济——虚拟地理环境研究20周年综述[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(8):1027-1030. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20180202. LIN Hui, ZHU Qing, CHEN Min. The being and non-being generate each other, and the virtual and the real are mutually interactive-the progress of virtual geographic environments (VGE) studies in last 20 years[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2018, 47(8):1027-1030. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20180202.
[2] 贾奋励, 张威巍, 游雄. 虚拟地理环境的认知研究框架初探[J]. 遥感学报, 2015, 19(2):179-187. JIA Fenli, ZHANG Weiwei, YOU Xiong. Cognitive research framework of virtual geographic environment[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2015, 19(2):179-187.
[3] ZHANG Fan, HU Mingyuan, CHE Weitao, et al. Framework for virtual cognitive experiment in virtual geographic environments[J]. ISPRS International Journalof Geo-Information, 2018, 7(1):36.
[4] TAN Lu, HU Mingyuan, LIN Hui. Agent-based simulation of building evacuation:combining human behavior with predictable spatial accessibility in a fire emergency[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 295:53-66.
[5] 郭仁忠, 应申. 论ICT时代的地图学复兴[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(10):1274-1283. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20170335. GUO Renzhong, YING Shen. The rejuvenation of cartography in ICT era[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2017, 46(10):1274-1283. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20170335.
[6] 张帆, 胡明远, 林珲. 大数据背景下的虚拟地理认知实验方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(8):1043-1050. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20180103. ZHANG Fan, HU Mingyuan, LIN Hui. Virtual geographic cognition experiment in big data era[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2018, 47(8):1043-1050. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20180103.
[7] LIN C T, HUANG Tengyi, LIN Wenjing, et al. Gender differences in wayfinding in virtual environments with global or local landmarks[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2012, 32(2):89-96.
[8] DUROISIN N, DEMEUSE M. Impact of the spatial structuring of virtual towns on the navigation strategies of children aged 6 to 15 years old[J]. Psychnology Journal, 2015, 13(1):75-99.
[9] TA X H, LONGIN D, GAUDOU B, et al. Modeling and simulation of the effects of social relation and emotion on decision making in emergency evacuation[J]. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2017, 8(9):371-392.
[10] FRANKE C, SCHWEIKART J. Mental representation of landmarks on maps:investigating cartographic visualization methods with eye tracking technology[J]. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 2017, 17(1-2):20-38.
[11] RICHARDSON A E, MONTELLO D R, HEGARTY M. Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments[J]. Memory & Cognition, 1999, 27(4):741-750.
[12] ŠAŠINKA Č, STACHOŇ Z, SEDLÁK M, et al. Collaborative immersive virtual environments for education in geography[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2019, 8(1):3.
[13] KIEFER P, GIANNOPOULOS I, RAUBAL M, et al. Eye tracking for spatial research:cognition, computation, challenges[J]. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 2017, 17(1-2):1-19.
[14] KOLETSIS E, VAN ELZAKKER C P J M, KRAAK M J, et al. An investigation into challenges experienced when route planning, navigating and wayfinding[J]. International Journal of Cartography, 2017, 3(1):4-18.
[15] OHM C, MVLLER M, LUDWIG B. Evaluating indoor pedestrian navigation interfaces using mobile eye tracking[J]. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 2017, 17(1-2):89-120.
[16] WANG Chengshun, CHEN Yufen, ZHENG Shulei, et al. Gender and age differences in using indoor maps for wayfinding in real environments[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2019, 8(1):11.
[17] 方志祥, 罗浩, 李灵. 有限状态自动机辅助的行人导航状态匹配算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(3):371-380. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20160530. FANG Zhixiang, LUO Hao, LI Ling. A finite state machine aided pedestrian navigation state matching algorithm[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2017, 46(3):371-380. DOI:10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20160530.
[18] 周宝定, 李清泉, 毛庆洲, 等. 用户行为感知辅助的室内行人定位[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2014, 39(6):719-723. ZHOU Baoding, LI Qingquan, MAO Qingzhou, et al. User activity awareness assisted indoor pedestrian localization[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(6):719-723.
[19] LUO B, ZHOU Q. An overview of training application of virtual reality technology[J]. Computer Simulation, 2020, 37(4):1-4.
[20] WOLBERS T, HEGARTY M. What determines our navigational abilities?[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2010, 14(3):138-146.
[21] LIBEN L S, MYERS L J, CHRISTENSEN A E. Identifying locations and directions on field and representational mapping tasks:predictors of success[J]. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 2010, 10(2-3):105-134.
[22] HEGARTY M, MONTELLO D R, RICHARDSON A E, et al. Spatial abilities at different scales:individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning[J]. Intelligence, 2006, 34(2):151-176.
[23] 刘儒德, 程铁刚, 牟书. 电子地图导航中用户空间定向认知过程机制的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2007, 5(3):161-165. LIU Rude, CHENG Tiegang, MOU Shu. Cognitive process in space orientation with e-map navigation system[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2007, 5(3):161-165.
[24] 周慧琳, 左国坤, 万小平, 等. 基于心理旋转的运动想象行为学实证探索[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2017, 34(2):173-179. ZHOU Huilin, ZUO Guokun, WAN Xiaoping, et al. An empirical study on the behavior of motor imagery based on mental rotation[J]. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2017, 34(2):173-179.
[25] EVANS G W. Environmental cognition[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88(2):259-287.
[26] EVANS G W. Cognición ambiental environmental cognition[J]. Studies in Psychology, 1983, 4(14-15):47-84.
[27] 李欣, 刘秀, 万欣欣. 数字孪生应用及安全发展综述[J].系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(3):385-392. LI Xin, LIU Xiu, WAN Xinxin. Overview of digital twins application and safe development[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31(3):385-392.
[28] 申申, 龚建华, 李文航, 等. 基于虚拟亲历行为的空间场所认知对比实验研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2018, 43(11):1732-1738. SHEN Shen, GONG Jianhua, LI Wenhang, et al. A comparative experiment on spatial cognition based on virtual travel behavior[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(11):1732-1738.
[29] BAYDOUN R B, NEUMAN G A. The future of the general aptitude test battery (GATB) for use in public and private testing[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1992, 7(1):81-91.
[30] LEI Peilan, KAO G Y M, LIN S S J, et al. Impacts of geographical knowledge, spatial ability and environmental cognition on image searches supported by GIS software[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, 25(6):1270-1279.
[31] HART R A, MOORE G T. The development of spatial cognition:a review[M]//DOWNS R M, STEA D. Image and Environment. Chicago, IL:Aldine, 1973.
[32] NORI R, MERCURI N, GIUSBERTI F, et al. Influences of gender role socialization and anxiety on spatial cognitive style[J]. The American Journal of Psychology, 2009, 122(4):497-505.
[33] COLUCCIA E, LOUSE G. Gender differences in spatial orientation:a review[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2004, 24(3):329-340.
[34] DONG Weihua, ZHENG Liangyu, LIU Bing, et al. Using eye tracking to explore differences in map-based spatial ability between geographers and non-geographers[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2019, 7(9):337.
[35] BURNETT G E. "Turn right at the King's Head":drivers' requirements for route guidance information[D]. Loughborough:Loughborough University, 1998.
[36] 董卫华, 廖华, 詹智成, 等. 2008年以来地图学眼动与视觉认知研究新进展[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3):599-614. DONG Weihua, LIAO Hua, ZHAN Zhicheng, et al. New research progress of eye tracking-based map cognition in cartography since 2008[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(3):599-614.
[37] 朱滢. 心理实验研究基础[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2006. ZHU Ying. Basis of psychological experiment research[M]. Beijing:Peking University Press, 2006.
[38] ROTH R E, ÇÖLTEKIN A, DELAZARI L, et al. User studies in cartography:opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations[J]. International Journal of Cartography, 2017, 3(S1):61-89.