Pearson correlation coefficient time delay estimation applied in acoustic orientation

doi:10.11947/j.AGCS.2025.20240406

Abstract

Abstract:

To address the problems of unreasonably reflecting the correlation between two signals and edge effects in the generalized cross correlation-PHAT (GCC-PHAT), which lead to inaccurate time delay estimation (TDE), low-precision TDE, in-ability to orientate targets, et al, a method for the TDE based on the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was proposed in this paper. The method uses the PCC to measure the correlation between two signals in a reasonable, accurate, and absolute manner. It shifts the observation signal, calculates the sliding PCC with the reference signal, and finds the position of the peak of absolute values to estimate the time delay. Simulation experiments show that compared to the GCC-PHAT, the proposed method improves the effective value ratio of the TDE by 14.67%, the precision of the TDE by 92.67%, and the precision of target orientation by 88.24%. Applying the method in a microphone array directional drone experiment, results further verify the high robustness and precision of the proposed method in the TDE; and compared to the GCC-PHAT, the proposed method improves the stable points ratio of target direction by 28.66%.

Key words: time delay estimation, generalized cross correlation-PHAT, Pearson correlation coefficient, microphone array, target orientation

CLC Number:

P228

Huiwen HU, Cong SHEN, Lintao LIU, Guocheng WANG. Pearson correlation coefficient time delay estimation applied in acoustic orientation[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2025, 54(7): 1206-1214.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: http://xb.chinasmp.com/EN/10.11947/j.AGCS.2025.20240406

http://xb.chinasmp.com/EN/Y2025/V54/I7/1206

Figures/Tables 9

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Tab. 3

Fig. 6

References 27

[1]	LI Fu, VACCARO R J. Unified analysis for DOA estimation algorithms in array signal processing[J]. Signal Processing, 1991, 25(2): 147-169.
[2]	LIAO Bin, MADANAYAKE A, AGATHOKLIS P. Array signal processing and systems[J]. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 29(2): 467-473.
[3]	蒋德军, 胡涛. 时延估计技术及其在多途环境中的应用[J]. 声学学报, 2001, 26(1): 34-40.
	JIANG Dejun, HU Tao. Time-delay estimation and its application in multipath environment[J]. Acta Acustica, 2001, 26(1): 34-40.
[4]	DA ROSA ZANATTA M, LÓPES DE MENDONÇA F L, ANTREICH F, et al. Tensor-based time-delay estimation for second and third generation global positioning system[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2019, 92: 1-19.
[5]	AZARIA M, HERTZ D. Time delay estimation by generalized cross correlation methods[J]. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1984, 32(2): 280-285.
[6]	张传义, 卢晓. 基于广义互功率谱相位法的声源定位技术[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39(8): 1075-1079.
	ZHANG Chuanyi, LU Xiao. Sound source localization technology based on generalized cross-power spectrum phase[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2018, 39(8): 1075-1079.
[7]	GAO Y, BRENNAN M J, JOSEPH P F. A comparison of time delay estimators for the detection of leak noise signals in plastic water distribution pipes[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 292(3-5): 552-570.
[8]	ZHANG Cheng, SHEN Shihui, HUANG Hai, et al. Estimation of the vehicle speed using cross-correlation algorithms and MEMS wireless sensors[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(5): 1721.
[9]	COBOS M, ANTONACCI F, COMANDUCCI L, et al. Frequency-sliding generalized cross-correlation: a sub-band time delay estimation approach[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 2020, 28: 1270-1281.
[10]	李皖婷, 李登峰, 张修靖, 等. 指数形式的二次相关GCC-PHAT-β时延估计算法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(33): 14779-14785.
	LI Wanting, LI Dengfeng, ZHANG Xiujing, et al. Exponential quadratic correlation GCC-PHAT-β delay estimation algorithm[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(33): 14779-14785.
[11]	梁宇, 马良, 纳霞, 等. 基于广义互相关算法的时延估计[J]. 计算机科学, 2011, 38(): 454-456.
	LIANG Yu, MA Liang, NA Xia, et al. Research of time delay estimation based on GCC algorithm[J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38(): 454-456.
[12]	邢毓华, 郑琦. 广义互相关在混沌扩频时延估计中的研究与应用[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2021, 58(23): 1907001.
	XING Yuhua, ZHENG Qi. Research and application of generalized cross correlation in chaotic spread spectrum time delay estimation[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(23): 1907001.
[13]	NIKIAS C L, PAN R. Time delay estimation in unknown Gaussian spatially correlated noise[J]. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1988, 36(11): 1706-1714.
[14]	TUGNAIT J K. Time delay estimation with unknown spatially correlated Gaussian noise[C]//Proceedings of 1991 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Toronto: IEEE, 1991: 1265-1268.
[15]	LIU Qing, HAN Shuangwang, MA Xiaoshu. Research of time delay estimation based on higher order statistics[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 530-531.
[16]	ARULAMPALAM M S, MASKELL S, GORDON N, et al. A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2002, 50(2): 174-188.
[17]	HAYES E E, THORP S, MANDEL K S, et al. Gaussn: Bayesian time-delay estimation for strongly lensed supernovae[J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2024, 530(4): 3942-3963.
[18]	CHAN K L, WANG Zhuoru, DING Aijun, et al. MAX-DOAS and OMI measurements of tropospheric NO2 and HCHO over Eastern China[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2020, 3(4): 1-13.
[19]	REN Dong, WANG Yong, WANG Guocheng, et al. Rising trends of global precipitable water vapor and its correlation with flood frequency[J]. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2023, 14(4): 355-367.
[20]	RUSAKOV D A. A misadventure of the correlation coefficient[J]. Trends in Neurosciences, 2023, 46(2): 94-96.
[21]	CHEN Kai, CHEN Li, XIAO Jiaqi, et al. Speckle reduction in digital holography with non-local means filter based on the Pearson correlation coefficient and Butterworth filter[J]. Optics Letters, 2022, 47(2): 397-400.
[22]	路晓妹, 寇文珍, 段渭军. 基于EMD分解重构的互相关时延估计方法[J]. 测控技术, 2013, 32(7): 45-48, 56.
	LU Xiaomei, KOU Wenzhen, DUAN Weijun. Cross-correlation delay estimation method based on EMD decomposition and reconstruction algorithm[J]. Measurement & Control Technology, 2013, 32(7): 45-48, 56.
[23]	CHEN Lai, KANG Chaogui, YANG Chao. Understanding citizens' emotion states under the urban livability environment through social media data: a case study of Wuhan[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2022, 5(2): 49-59.
[24]	张春森, 张萌萌, 郭丙轩. 影像信息驱动的三角网格模型优化方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(7): 959-967. DOI: . doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20170733
	ZHANG Chunsen, ZHANG Mengmeng, GUO Bingxuan. Refinement of the 3D mesh model driven by the image information[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2018, 47(7): 959-967. DOI: . doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20170733
[25]	王兆瑞, 张杰. 一种基于小波变换的波达方向估计方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2011, 40(): 111-114.
	WANG Zhaorui, ZHANG Jie. A method of DOA estimation based on wavelet transform[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2011, 40(): 111-114.
[26]	YANG Xu, XING Hongyan, YAN Yan. A data complementary method for sound source localization based on four-element microphone array groups[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2021, 32(9): 095015.
[27]	LI Yang, ZOU Xihua, LIU Puyu, et al. Four-element array for GNSS attitude determination using IRLS: an improved rounding of long-short baseline approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69(5): 4920-4934.

阵元序号	异常值个数的比例/（%）		去异常值后均方根误差/（°）
阵元序号	GCC-PHAT	本文方法	GCC-PHAT	本文方法
1、2	14.00	0.00	1.5×10^－4	1.1×10^－5
1、3	48.00	0.00	2.2×10^－4	2.9×10^－4
1、4	0.00	0.00	2.1×10^－5	1.5×10^－5
2、3	3.00	0.00	1.6×10^－5	1.3×10^－5
2、4	8.00	0.00	7.7×10^－5	7.8×10^－6
3、4	15.00	0.00	1.0×10^－5	1.0×10^－5

目标方向	方法	定向方程组有解的比例/（%）	异常值个数的比例/（%）	去异常值后均方根误差/（°）
俯仰角	GCC-PHAT	71.00	28.17	0.54
俯仰角	本文方法	100.00	0.00	0.13
方位角	GCC-PHAT	71.00	21.13	0.85
方位角	本文方法	100.00	0.00	0.10

方法	定向方程组有解的比例	在俯仰角稳定性上占优比例	在方位角稳定性上占优比例
GCC-PHAT	98.22	35.67	39.89
本文方法	100.00	64.33	60.11